Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strongest Material Ever Found in Atom-Thick Carbyne Chains
Science World Report ^ | Oct 11, 2013

Posted on 10/12/2013 12:44:48 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter

The strongest material ever could be carbyne, atom-thick chains of carbon, according to theoretical calculations by Rice University Physicists. The big question is now if and when anyone can make it in bulk.

Carbyne is a chain of carbon atoms held together by either double or alternating single and triple atomic bonds. That makes it a true one-dimensional material, unlike atom-thin sheets of graphene, which have a top and a bottom, or hollow nanotubes, which have an inside and outside.

These carbyne nanorods or nanoropes, if they can be made, would have a host of remarkable and useful properties, as described in a new paper by Rice University theoretical physicist Boris Yakobson and his group:

Carbyne’s tensile strength — the ability to withstand stretching — surpasses “that of any other known material” and is double that of graphene. (Scientists have calculated it would take an elephant on a pencil to break through a sheet of graphene.) It has twice the tensile stiffness of graphene and carbon nanotubes and nearly three times that of diamond. Stretching carbyne as little as 10 percent alters its electronic band gap significantly. If outfitted with molecular handles at the ends, it can also be twisted to alter its band gap. With a 90-degree end-to-end rotation, it becomes a magnetic semiconductor. Carbyne chains can take on side molecules that may make the chains suitable for energy storage. The material is stable at room temperature, largely resisting crosslinks with nearby chains.

“You could look at it as an ultimately thin graphene ribbon, reduced to just one atom, or an ultimately thin nanotube,” Yakobson said.. It could be useful for nanomechanical systems, in spintronic devices, as sensors, as strong and light materials for mechanical applications, or for energy storage.

Based on the calculations, he said carbyne might be the highest energy state for stable carbon.

Theories about carbyne first appeared in the 19th century, and an approximation of the material was first synthesized in the USSR in 1960. Carbyne has since been seen in compressed graphite, has been detected in interstellar dust, and has been created in small quantities by experimentalists.

Yakobson said the researchers were surprised to find that the band gap in carbyne was so sensitive to twisting. “It will be useful as a sensor for torsion or magnetic fields, if you can find a way to attach it to something that will make it twist,” he said.

Another finding of great interest was the energy barrier that keeps atoms on adjacent carbyne chains from collapsing into each other. “When you’re talking about theoretical material, you always need to be careful to see if it will react with itself,” Artyukhov said. “This has never really been investigated for carbyne.”

Rice University researchers have determined from first-principle calculations that carbyne would be the strongest material yet discovered. The carbon-atom chains would be difficult to make but would be twice as strong as two-dimensional graphene sheets. The literature seemed to indicate carbyne “was not stable and would form graphite or soot,” he said. Instead, the researchers found carbon atoms on separate strings might overcome the barrier in one spot, but the rods’ stiffness would prevent them from coming together in a second location, at least at room temperature.

“Bundles might stick to each other, but they wouldn’t collapse completely,” Yakobson added. “That could make for a highly porous, random net that may be good for adsorption.”

Rice graduate student Fangbo Xu and former postdoctoral researcher Hoonkyung Lee, now a professor at Konkuk University in South Korea, are co-authors of the paper. Yakobson is Rice’s Karl F. Hasselmann Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, a professor of chemistry and a member of the Richard E. Smalley Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology.

The Air Force Office of Scientific Research and the Welch Foundation supported the research. Calculations were performed on the National Science Foundation-supported DaVinCI supercomputer, administered by Rice’s Ken Kennedy Institute for Information Technology.

Reference:

Mingjie Liu et al., Carbyne from First Principles: Chain of C Atoms, a Nanorod or a Nanorope, ACS Nano, 2013, DOI: 10.1021/nn404177r


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: carbyne; graphene; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Kent1957
Light weight bullet proof vest?

It might prevent the bullet pentetratation, but it's not going to do anything to dissipate kinetic energy.

21 posted on 10/12/2013 1:15:03 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kent1957

Carbyne coated aluminum gun barrels?


22 posted on 10/12/2013 1:17:48 PM PDT by 353FMG ( I don't say whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

“Carbyne’s tensile strength — the ability to withstand stretching ....”

That’s an overly-simplified statement. The tensile strength of a material is the maximum amount of tensile stress (pulling force) it can withstand before failure. Some materials are ductile (stretch under tension), others are brittle (don’t stretch before breaking). A ductile material may have the same tensile strength as a brittle material — it would just stretch a lot more before failure. I won’t mention modulus of elasticity.


23 posted on 10/12/2013 1:24:49 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

“Maybe I will finally get my space elevator.”

That would be a game-changing application.


24 posted on 10/12/2013 1:26:01 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

The writer is but an ignorati...... trying to enlighten others ofhis ilk.

He also thinks concrete is cement


25 posted on 10/12/2013 1:27:05 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

I just want to see that elephant on a pencil.


26 posted on 10/12/2013 1:29:59 PM PDT by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
I’ll stick with Duct Tape

By George....someone who actually knows the correct spelling of the term! I thought I was the only one left :-)

27 posted on 10/12/2013 1:36:50 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

This is a big reason not to despair about the future: technology changes everything.


28 posted on 10/12/2013 1:37:05 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Is this a workable material?

Looking for a hollow sphere, 1 mm or so, with a number (probably less tnan a dozen) nanothickness spikes.


29 posted on 10/12/2013 1:38:34 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

It’s basically a strong, impossibly thin weapon which simply slices through anything at all.


Does your vorpal blade go “Snicker-Snack?”


30 posted on 10/12/2013 1:39:57 PM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

I’ll trade you a sack full of Higgs Bosons for two of those.


31 posted on 10/12/2013 1:41:36 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

From the article: “Scientists have calculated it would take an elephant on a pencil to break through a sheet of graphene...”

I apologize for my fellow physicists. Apparently, in all that excitement, they forgot to calculate the piss-poor compressive strength of a pencil...

Cheers!


32 posted on 10/12/2013 1:43:15 PM PDT by DoctorBulldog (I can't be a racist because, I can't stand Biden and Pelosi, either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

I’ll trade you a sack full of Higgs Bosons for two of those.


33 posted on 10/12/2013 1:43:26 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tula Git

Unobtanium? Is that a Green Lantern animated series reference?


34 posted on 10/12/2013 1:46:21 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Government: Slimy used car salesmen writing laws forcing you to buy their cars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Winner!


35 posted on 10/12/2013 1:47:18 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Government: Slimy used car salesmen writing laws forcing you to buy their cars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Existing carbine


36 posted on 10/12/2013 1:47:36 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
One dimension is a line not a point.

True that, my mistake.

Was thinking a little too small :)
Guess, paraphrasing what you said, it would be as close as you could get to a 1 dimensional object composed of atoms in the real world.

37 posted on 10/12/2013 1:48:01 PM PDT by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Not literally one dimensional but about the closest thing possible in the physical world.

In quantum physics, dimensions one atom thick are comparable to the proportional dimensions of the known universe


38 posted on 10/12/2013 1:50:34 PM PDT by Cyman (kes the life out of them as they are in the throwsof mutual passion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Just pulling your carbyne chain


39 posted on 10/12/2013 1:52:41 PM PDT by Cyman (kes the life out of them as they are in the throwsof mutual passion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

gun barrels? I didn’t see anything about abrasion resistance so I’m guessing we just have to look around for the guys with the blacky fingers to figger out who’s been playing with the graphite. So far it looks like a coating with no thickness would be good for one shot and a 911 call. One of those deals where your wife punches the 9 and the 1 and waits for the shot to punch the the other 1.


40 posted on 10/12/2013 1:58:18 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson