There truly is tyranny afoot
Actually this has been known for sometime. She has needed to recuse herself from several cases but has not.
” Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets.”
Actually that is NOT what Snopes said. It said the dockets existed but did not pertain to his ‘eligibility’ issue as stated in the email. One needs to research each docket to verify this.
You know of a way to delete threads on Free Republic?
Most of us have read and known about Elana Kagan defending Barack Obama for some time now.
http://www.wnd.com/2010/08/187797/
"Editors Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described a series of cases for which Elena Kagan represented the government as eligibility cases. Those cases, in fact, were a series of unrelated disputes pending before the Supreme Court and the references have been removed from this report."
Look, I get it that Obama is bad. He has passed Klintoon, LBJ and Carter as the worst President in our history. There are a host of legitimate reasons to criticize Obama.
However, one of the main weapons that the left has in its arsenal is ridicule. They have succeeded in using ridicule to help capture an entire generation of young people. Posting stuff like this only makes the job of the left easier.
Snopes is run by an extreme left-wing man/woman team that are fanatic Obama supporters and have been caught in one lie after another.
Snopes is good for debunking “kidney removal in the bathtub” stories,
but nothing even remotely political.
If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
*************
The question maybe should be....
Are you interested in justice or in truth?
SNOPES is not reliable.
snopes is a bogus leftist site that lies. The couple that own it are communists.
What? We can afford to pay the Supreme Court?
Has anyone asked snopes if snope is reliable, snoping snopes, and is there any way anyone with that much power would be able to be objective?
It is a little frustrating, though. David may be a registered independent, and Barbara may be a Canadian citizen who can't register with any party but that doesn't mean that they don't have biases. Biases that come out not so much in the things they fight for, but in what they take for granted and what they dismiss as not worth discussing.
FactCheck.org's vouching for Snopes isn't very convincing, as the two groups probably share most of the same assumptions and prejudices (I don't see that Soros funds FactCheck.org, either. They have enough foundation money. Soros did fund the shortlived factcheck.com, though).
All I need to know about it is that my creepy liberal boss frequently quotes Snopes.
I checked this e-mail on Snopes and they said it was false.
(Oh, OK, I’m kidding. Chill out, man.)