liberals have minds?
Poop is “speech”?
How about lead?
A new pre-school book in my wife’s school: “Everybody Poops.”
Garbage in.....
And some of you got mad at me for writing about snot.
Valkyrie...”You leave the place better than you found it.”
Right...sure. Commies and leftists trash everything and leave it for others to pick up. Look at Occupy XYZ, Seattle WTO, you name it. What fevered dreams she has.
“’Alley Valkyrie.’ Now there’s a made-up handle if I ever heard one.”
Signed,
Rod Manly
Poop happens. Speech happens. Ergo...
Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey.
These people are demented.
Proof that liberals DO talk out of their a$$es.
Alley Valkyrie (why yes, I'm sure that's her real name) must be having a transcendental experience where she's actually part of Tea Party rally. There is NO lefty group that doesn't sh!t all over place and leave it behind for some downtrodden minority to pick up (you know, those same minorities said lefties say they're protesting for).
Smearing poop on a Bible or American flag is free speech to liberals, but hate speech if smeared on a Koran
No, Speech comes out of the other end.
In fact, historical material pertaining to James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Justice John Marshall and John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of 14th Amendment, all clearly indicate that the states had decided that general prohibitons of government power in the BoR applied only to the federal government unless expressly applied to the states.
For example, Jefferson had noted the following concerning the 1st and 10th Amendments. The Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the states had reserved government power to regulate our basic 1st Amendment protected freedoms uniquely to themselves, regardless that they had made the 1st Amendment to prohibit such powers entirely to Congress.
"3. Resolved that it is true as a general principle and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the constitution that ‘the powers not delegated to the US. by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the people’: and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the US. by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, & were reserved, to the states or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated rather than the use be destroyed; (emphasis added) …" --Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.
Although FDR's puppet justices later claimed that the 14th Amendment applied the BoR's limitations and prohibitions of certain government powers to the states, they wrongly ignored that John Bingham, mentioned above, had officially clarified in the congressional record that 14A did not take away state rights.
"The adoption of the proposed amendment will take from the States no rights (emphasis added) that belong to the States." --John Bingham, Appendix to the Congressional Globe. (see bottom half of first column)"No right (emphasis added) reserved by the Constitution to the States should be impaired…" --John Bingham, Appendix to the Congressional Globe. (see top half of first column)
"Do gentlemen say that by so legislating we would strike down the rights of the State? God forbid. I believe our dual system of government essential to our national existance." --John Bingham, Appendix to the Congressional Globe. (see bottom half of third column)
So what institutionally indoctrinated Attorney Lauren Regan evidently doesn't understand about the 1st and 10th Amendments is the following. Based on Jefferson's words about 10A-protected nanny state power to reasonably regulate our 1A-protected rights, and Bingham's clarifications that 14A did not take such powers away, both cities and states can make laws which reasonably protect the public from potentially unsanitary expressions of so-called free speech.
Is that some kind of spider in her hair?
Nowhere on earth has flinging fecal waste at others been considered free speech.
It is a health hazard and I would assume it to be a physical assault on me and my health. if those people have incurable infections of any kind that is potentially a death sentence.
I believe officers are allowed to shoot at people they believe have AIDS or other deadly diseases and are trying to infect others. I know courts give these people long sentences for deliberately doing this to people.