Posted on 07/12/2013 10:31:02 AM PDT by pinochet
Gay people make up only 2 percent of the people in society. How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations?
I am aware that social conservatives are uncomfortable discussing genetic reasons, because it gives gay radicals an excuse to engage in sin. But acknowledging a genetic factor does not remove moral responsibility from gay people, and they remain under obligation to engage in Biblical sexual behavior. Gays will be put in the same situation as married men who are faithful to their wives, despite the fact that they are genetically inclined to be attracted to women that they are not married to.
Nobody can deny the fact that, despite gays being 2 percent of the entire population, they are heavily represented among the elites in America and other Western nations. Some men look more "manly" than other men, while some women look more "feminine" than other women. In the fashion industry, the latest trend in modelling are the androgynous men - a group of men who look so feminine, that they have successful careers as female models. These are not the Transgender men who get breast implants and inject themselves with female hormones. These are everyday guys who look so feminine, that they can just put on a wig and look exactly like women. One of the most famous is an Australian model known as Andrej Pejic, who let his hair grow long, and he models women's clothing. Here is a website showing the fashion magazines he has appeared in: http://andrejpejicofficial.com/gallery/
I suspect that these androgynous men have the ability to think like both men and women. This gives them an advantage in advancing their careers and building businesses. I love Free Republic, because it is a venue where manly men can talk about manly things, without being intimidated by the left. But how many Freeper men can work as interior decorators? How many can work as hair dressers? How many can design clothes? How many can become ballet dancers? How many can become Hollywood screen writers, who can write scripts for movies that can make women cry? How many can direct Broadway plays? These are career paths that can take a sissy man from a working class background, and put him in contact with rich and powerful people who help to make public policy.
Those "sissy" talents are also useful in "regular" jobs such as selling insurance policies. A regular "manly" man is able to understand the minds of men, and is able to sell to 50 percent of the population. Because the "sissy man" is able to understand the minds of 100 percent of the population, he can sell twice as much insurance, giving him a better chance of becoming CEO of the insurance company. Those "sissy" talents may also be helpful in getting senior clerical positions in churches, in politics, in the media, etc.
You said it.
I don’t think homosexuality in the upper-income classes is due to any mystery of genetics. Behavioral/nurture causes are well established for homosexuality amoung men.
Absent upper-middle-class fathers—working 60+ hour weeks, each to keep his family in the money, is a perfectly plausible explanation as to why so many homosexual men grow up into the educated elite. It is proven that homosexual men almost always have absent or strained relationships with their fathers growing up.
Also the fact that a well educated, well connected man—who has no family to feed—is able, to save money and focus on his career better, I’d say, than a married family man. This puts them on a faster career track.
Not to be ignored too, is the network of homosexual men—who will help each-other in employment, over and above the despised-by-homosexuals straight “breeders.”
I saw evidence of this first hand when I worked with a homosexual boss in a very well known DC think-tank. My office was next to his, and I’d hear him discuss helping and hiring other homosexuals with his homosexual colleagues. Homosexual behavior to these men, was like being in a club or fraternity—in which they would help one another.
Very sick, sad, and disturbing, especially for our country.
It’s has zero to do with genetics! Come on now...ue your common sense man! They have a female spirit that comes from hating their moms intensely or even their dads. You become what you hate inside...that is all. So yes, they are more manipulative and crafty than even the “best” woman in that role.
Gay men are not women trapped in male bodies. They do not think like women or have “spirits” like women. I’ve been around gay males for my entire life and they bear no resemblance to women.
It will be mixed race, too - one of the Pa Kettles will be black.
“Homosexuals were the power elite in Sodom and Gomorrah”
The five kings of which couldn’t handle the terrorist bands known as the “four kings”, and lived in terror and enslavement to them.. It was Abraham and his 318 men who wiped out the “four kings” in order to rescue his nephew Lot who had been kidnapped by them. Abraham refused the spoils offered to him by the corrupt rulers of S and G except for what food the men needed for their own needs.
Thus one can derive a cautionary lesson for what happens to nations given over to ungodliness. Despite the combined economic might of S and G, these cities couldn’t even get it together enough to defend themselves whereas Abraham with his small bands had the moral wherewithall and favor of God got the job done.
They network well.
That's easy. Just think of a man, and subtract reason and accountability.
;^)
Satan takes care of his own.
As hair dressers,interior decorators and fashion designers,sure.Otherwise....not so much.
Sissy men understand women but *I* wouldn't even bother asking one for the time of day.
No women to spend it.
Uhh, no.
The heyday of homosexual influence in the Empire actually coincided in time very neatly with its golden age, as indeed it did in Greece.
When the Empire fell, it had been Christian, with sodomy a capital crime, for over 150 years.
We could argue forever about why Rome fell, but it had little if anything to do with homosexuality.
This ridiculous notion came about because when people think of Rome they think of Nero and Caligula, who are among the best-known Roman emperors simply because they had the most entertaining stories told about them by historians.
I don’t believe “sissy-success”.
But we do have a society that links merit to long hours on the job, lots of travel and career as the highest priority. This is why both homosexuals AND childless women are rising to the top in many areas. They aren’t burdened by families.
You are right in your statement that after Emperor Constantine converted the empire to Christianity the were laws against homosexual act.
I did not say that homosexuality caused the fall of the Roman Empire but my poor wording could cause someone to infer that.
Thanks for the clarifications. All your statements are correct.
yes
[How did they end up having so much power]
The Eunuchs have been in the occult woodwork of every instance of theocratic tyranny throughout Western history.
I think they learned a thing or two whilst breeding slaves for the Chaldeans, and Babylonians, and Egyptians, and Romans...
SOSDT
[How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations? ]
They LIE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.