Posted on 07/12/2013 10:31:02 AM PDT by pinochet
Gay people make up only 2 percent of the people in society. How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations?
I am aware that social conservatives are uncomfortable discussing genetic reasons, because it gives gay radicals an excuse to engage in sin. But acknowledging a genetic factor does not remove moral responsibility from gay people, and they remain under obligation to engage in Biblical sexual behavior. Gays will be put in the same situation as married men who are faithful to their wives, despite the fact that they are genetically inclined to be attracted to women that they are not married to.
Nobody can deny the fact that, despite gays being 2 percent of the entire population, they are heavily represented among the elites in America and other Western nations. Some men look more "manly" than other men, while some women look more "feminine" than other women. In the fashion industry, the latest trend in modelling are the androgynous men - a group of men who look so feminine, that they have successful careers as female models. These are not the Transgender men who get breast implants and inject themselves with female hormones. These are everyday guys who look so feminine, that they can just put on a wig and look exactly like women. One of the most famous is an Australian model known as Andrej Pejic, who let his hair grow long, and he models women's clothing. Here is a website showing the fashion magazines he has appeared in: http://andrejpejicofficial.com/gallery/
I suspect that these androgynous men have the ability to think like both men and women. This gives them an advantage in advancing their careers and building businesses. I love Free Republic, because it is a venue where manly men can talk about manly things, without being intimidated by the left. But how many Freeper men can work as interior decorators? How many can work as hair dressers? How many can design clothes? How many can become ballet dancers? How many can become Hollywood screen writers, who can write scripts for movies that can make women cry? How many can direct Broadway plays? These are career paths that can take a sissy man from a working class background, and put him in contact with rich and powerful people who help to make public policy.
Those "sissy" talents are also useful in "regular" jobs such as selling insurance policies. A regular "manly" man is able to understand the minds of men, and is able to sell to 50 percent of the population. Because the "sissy man" is able to understand the minds of 100 percent of the population, he can sell twice as much insurance, giving him a better chance of becoming CEO of the insurance company. Those "sissy" talents may also be helpful in getting senior clerical positions in churches, in politics, in the media, etc.
Affirmative Action has been very good to homosexuals, women and Blacks.
Pray for America to Wake Up
ROTFL! How many want to?
Those "sissy" talents are also useful in "regular" jobs such as selling insurance policies. A regular "manly" man is able to understand the minds of men, and is able to sell to 50 percent of the population. Because the "sissy man" is able to understand the minds of 100 percent of the population, he can sell twice as much insurance, giving him a better chance of becoming CEO of the insurance company. Those "sissy" talents may also be helpful in getting senior clerical positions in churches, in politics, in the media, etc.?
I think your argument has some serious flaws to work through.
While there are more male geniuses than females, there are also more men than women who are profoundly stupid.
The maladaptive reproductive effects of homosexuality may have been masked in the past by strong social pressures to appear heterosexual.
Gays with higher average intelligence were able to out-compete the bottom tier of men in resource acquisition and social climbing. Then they went against their desire and married women purely as a way of maintaining their social standing within the group.
They have more time to devote to their careers, because they don’t have to be concerned about family.
That's cuz it's true
And it was only recently that I realized how valuable a MARRIED man is to a hiring manager vs. a single man. Married men tend to be more stable and reliable as workers. As I was married just a year ago but in a monogamous relationship longer than that, my hiring manager saw me to be more stable than a recent divorcee and a recent college grad. He was probably right!
This is just stupid.
Have a good product at a good price and you can sell. This whole “sissy man” concept is ridiculous
I disagree- I think homosexuality is genetic
I saw a lesbo meeting at a local park once and you would swear half of them were men!
They have female chromosomes, but too many male hormones or something... it is not ALL ‘choice’ (yes, some is)
Yes, Mormons are another good example.
Yes.
1. Fewer days lost due to sick children.
2. Well developed acting skills (also why so many in Hollywood) as they learned to hide by acting normal from an early age on.
3. Higher levels of sociopaths in positions of power, both because they tend to enjoy manipulating others and because they tend to make business decisions based on, well, business, rather than emotional connections to employees and customers.
“Gay people make up only 2 percent of the people in society. How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations?”
Because of positioning. Firstly, they exercise a huge amount of control over the television and movie industries. This enables them to put forth propaganda to the masses, and they have done so with increasing tempo since roughly about the late 1980s. Secondly, they have a lot of support and presence in higher academia. This second one gives them access to the classes that hold power in America- the people who go on to become lawyers, politicians, bankers, and the like. This basically facilitates a class of enablers- people sympathetic to the homo agenda or who are not inclined to stand in its way- who go on to hold positions of power and influence in government and commerce. That means they get sympathetic judges, politicians, and government bureaucrats, and access to power over policy and laws. Thus, they are able to silence criticism, and eventually, if they wish, attempt to ride roughshod over any legal opposition.
Heard Hollywood is doing a remake of Ma and Pa Kettle. It will be called Pa and Pa Kettle.
The last study I read on the subject showed that gays earned 7% more than non-gays. Some of this may be due to their willingness to move to new locations due to lack of family ties.
I think that studies actually show wives help their husbands careers. The higher education of the wife, the more it would help the husband's careers. Other studies showed the more children a man had, the more he earned.
I agree hormones often play a role in developing the disorder but it's not genetics driven, it's environmental, sometimes in the womb. Many lesbians were molested or had bad relationships with men during their formative years. I also agree they didn't choose the disorder nor can they un-choose it, but little to no genetic codes are involved in such a complex behavior disorder. It's been researched and there is little evidence for homosexuality being encoded in DNA. If there was DNA involved it would have died out long ago.
YES YES YES. Exactly like the Masons to the power of 100.
I know from working in arts/entertainment.
I’m told by female hairdressers that straight male hairdressers are preferred by many women because the women feel that a straight male will work harder to make the woman look more beautiful than the males will!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.