| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 07/11/2013 8:54:44 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 07/11/2013 7:44:32 AM PDT by pabianice
Watching Fox News Channel coverage of Zimmerman trial. Judge has just sprung another surprise against Zimmerman, saying jury can consider Martin's death as child abuse so jury can convict based upon that, too, and perhaps convict him of voluntary manslaughter. This trial is a travesty.
This is not about Zimmerman. It is about the animals now wanting a shooting war, as total and with as little delay as possible.
Obama is going to leave a legacy that will have Hitler look like a kindergartner.
Then you get your answer about Atty Gen. or somebody out of the White House really reaming these people good down in Florida to "toe the line", Sieg Heil!
So a judge in Florida can arbitrarily decide to charge a defendant in the middle of a trial?
If someone did that to me,I’d certainly shoot them too.As would most folks here.George’s bid mistake was letting Martin get in too close.
Has anyone other than myself seen the picture of a 17 year-old Martin? I have tried to post it, but it won’t copy. He’s tattooed and is 6 ft.2 in. and 180 lbs.
That's all they ever do, this kabuki theater is not far from the norm
.
Her term expires in 2018. Ugh.
Slowly.
SANFORD, Fla. State prosecutors are asking the judge in the Trayvon Martin murder case to instruct the jury to consider lesser charges manslaughter and aggravated assault when they begin deliberations Friday. The ruling came after the prosecution sought to include two lesser charges from the original murder in the second degree: manslaughter and felony murder in the third degree with child abuse as the underlying felony.
This is just one of the many ways that I simply don’t recognize my country anymore.
Honestly as appalling as this is I’ve seen similarly ridiculous anti-constitutional miscarriages multiple times.
White woman shoved down a flight of stairs and beaten when she hobbled to an elevator by black BOE security guards (who said “this is what you get for voting for Bush”) and while they have no arrest authority she was jailed and convicted of “resisting arrest” - even though they did not arrest, have no arrest authority, was the assault victim, did not fight back AND despite a black officer who was not the main cop who took her in claiming otherwise... the reports from the night of the arrest impeached his lies stating the woman had been sitting quietly with her purse on her lap Jury convicted her of “resisting arrest” one of the extra charges thrown in because they could not propve that the victim assaulted the guards (though she had many defensive bruises)
This is going to increase Americas outrage at the rail roading of an in in ocent man using the full force of the Obama DOJ and the State of Florida.
These corrupt scum bags need to realize how badly and how unjustly they have over reached.
After this trial, they may need to be more concerned with mainstream America breaking out the Tar and Feathers and selecting an unusually narrow and uncomfortable rail and especially bumpy road ride them out of town on than they are of having some gang bangers from the hood rioting
Your question as to elective or appointed is very interesting perhaps even crucial to Zimmerman’s defense. The public can see this judge is probably a ‘women’s rights’ lawyer/judge by one or the other routes. I have seen too many of these easy come law students/lawyers. I hope this woman becomes a poster example of to what our judicial system has been degraded.
Apparently, this charge has been requested to bolster a charge against Zimmerman. As of now, he could be convicted of second degree murder, manslaughter, or third degree felony murder. The child abuse charge is meant to support the possible third degree murder charge.
This judge knew this stuff was all coming — she and the state sandbagged the defense.
I wonder if O’Mara is having second thoughts about his presser last night — about “preserving the memory of Trayvon Martin” at the potential cost to his client.
She’s obviously drawing on precedent set in the Castro vs. People of Cuba case.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the court (judge) allowes the jury to consider parking violations in this case. What one sided Kangaroo show trial this is. The prosecution couldn’t get the witnesses or testimony they wanted but they sure as hell got the judge they wanted.
it’s become a kangaroo curt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.