Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/14/2013 8:02:09 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Borges; DollyCali; Perdogg

ping


2 posted on 06/14/2013 8:02:47 PM PDT by EveningStar ("What color is the sky in your world?" -- Frasier Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I’m going to see it tomorrow. I have two friends who’ve already seen it and they gave it very good marks.

It seems that most of the critics who have panned it wanted it to be more like Richard Donner’s “Superman.” Well, that was a very good film. But it has already been done, and “Superman Returns” showed us what happens when you try to make it again.


5 posted on 06/14/2013 8:11:46 PM PDT by GrootheWanderer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I just saw it. Not bad at all. MILES better than previous Superman movies, which were mostly unwatchable. Some of the fight scenes had too many fast action closeups, but all in all a good movie. It took decades but technology can finally do justice to superhero movies.


6 posted on 06/14/2013 8:12:24 PM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Saw it tonight. Loved it.


7 posted on 06/14/2013 8:14:22 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Any gay scenes...like the James Bond movie?


9 posted on 06/14/2013 8:17:48 PM PDT by BobL (To us it's a game, to them it's personal - therefore they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
Comments from last night's premiere postings on another thread...

All in all my wife & I liked it - really good story and character development actually, and good casting - especially Superman. I liked it a lot more than expected.

However, for a 2:28 minute movie they could have cut out at least 28 minutes of gratuitous property and building smashing and explosions, still had tons of such action left, and the movie would have lost nothing.

I swear if they'd smashed another couple dozen buildings more than the couple thousand they smashed throughout the movie, I would have lost it. Toward the end when they got tired of trashing all the cities on Earth and decided to take the fighting into orbit and start smashing satellites, I almost started laughing.

Regardless, a good movie overall and probably the best Superman movie yet. I'd recommend it.

12 posted on 06/14/2013 8:22:39 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Best Superman movie ever!


13 posted on 06/14/2013 8:26:44 PM PDT by Ruger1099
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I saw it this afternoon.

All these good reviews surprise me.

If a good movie is all about effects and choreography, and wall to wall fist fighting then the movie was great.

Plotwise it totally bombed

There was hardly ANY character development

There was 10 times more alien technology than there was Superman saving the day.

Too many flashbacks to cover early years.

WAY too much collateral damage. NO WAY all those buildings fall without killing thousands of people. Virtually nothing left of the city which Superman didn’t seem to mind punching holes in. Where did all the people go??? the city looked like a nuke hit it, but no dead people on the streets.

WAY too much emphasis on Zod and this new element of Kryptonians being a bunch of test tube breeders.

I was totally disappointed in it overall.


17 posted on 06/14/2013 9:31:03 PM PDT by Safrguns (PM me if you like to play Minecraft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Almost 26,000 reviewers have reviewed it on imdb.com, with a score of 8.4/10.0 ... An excellent overall rating. I ignore what critics say, and reliably count on what viewers my age have said...

See review:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0770828/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt


18 posted on 06/14/2013 9:45:50 PM PDT by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Loved it. Loved the character development but really loved the Christian imagery.


19 posted on 06/14/2013 10:03:01 PM PDT by Frapster (Forgive the typos... They know not why they are there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

Really enjoyed the movie. The casting was excellent. Really was great to see Jor-El do more in this movie. Job well done by Russell Crowe. My only complaint would be the shaky camera and the end seemed to drag on a bit too long.

The Jesus allegory was definitely in this movie. Couldn’t escape it.

Can’t wait for the next one and where they take this.


22 posted on 06/14/2013 10:10:58 PM PDT by Revelation Concepts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
I'm to old to watch this steaming pile of cow flop. The very thought of such Orwellian new-age revisionism makes me ill.
24 posted on 06/14/2013 10:27:19 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
Saw it today. I gave it an 8, my wife gave it a 9. It was a little slow getting started, but had a good ending. The middle was special effect utopia. Overload? Can you have “too much” ice cream?

It isn't “Gone With The Wind”, IT'S A SUPERMAN MOVIE! You know, like in comic books.

I must say Diane Lane had a stand out performance worthy of an Oscar. Not likely in a Superman Movie.

I would characterize this Superman movie as the “Chronicles of Superman” or Superman meets “The Chronicles of Riddick”, with a few Avatar flying things.

This is one of “THE BEST” Superman movies. If you like Superman, you won't be disappointed.

We saw the 3D version. As with most 3D movies I've seen, there just isn't enough 3D STUFF in it.

Go see it. Take the kids. Have some popcorn and enjoy the show.

25 posted on 06/14/2013 10:41:22 PM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I just got back from seeing it. Overall, I was happy I saw it, but I was also conflicted. I would say it was at least 100 times better than Superman Returns from a few years ago, but it was only about half as compelling as the first Christopher Reeve 1978 Superman movie. On a scale of 1-10, this was a 6.

Maybe I’m just getting old (44) but I have to agree with many of the previous posters who have noted the gratuitous length of the fight scenes. It literally becomes boring as the special-effects artists find ways to destroy building after building across the New York/Metropolis skyline (by the way, why is every superhero movie taking out their wrath on the buildings of New York? Can’t we get just one super villain taking out Chicago or LA for a change?).

I get it, General Zod and Superman don’t like each other. You don’t have to beat the audience over the head with it. I could have happily traded ALL of the highly CGI-ed fight scenes for a few reasons to care about the characters:

- Lois was just a prop, the movie didn’t provide a reason to care about her relationship with Superman/Clark. She could have died at any time and the movie would have provided the same emotional relevance as a nameless extra dying.
- The movie didn’t offer reasons to deeply care about General Zod, or his crew, other than that they were wrecking lots of stuff, and it would be nice to stop them.
- Perry White, see Lois.
- Even the adult Superman himself. You always gotta root for the guy in the red cape, but beyond the suit, the man himself didn’t make you fall in love with the character. Having said that, the flashbacks in which we see Clark as a child DOES offer some emotional resonance.

On the other hand the movie offers a world of reasons to care about Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and he did not disappoint. Looking back I think he is really the star of this movie, even if his screen time is limited. Also Jor-El’s wife does a decent job, as do Clark’s earth parents. And a special call out to Christopher Meloni. As an army colonel who was basically reprising the same character he plays on Law & Order SVU, nobody glares at everyone like him.

Overall, I would say it was really nice to see Superman flying across the screen again. My hope is that the sequel will invest a little more in the characters and a lot less in fights that go on for seemingly hours at a time. I understand that is what superhero movies are about, but (as
Iron Man, Spider Man and Batman did extremely well) give us some reasons to care deeply about the characters and the people they care about before you start breaking everything in sight.


30 posted on 06/15/2013 2:14:25 AM PDT by TooMuchCowbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I’ll pass...
i am completely sick of these superhero movies.
Actually I was sick of superheroes back when i was 16.


41 posted on 06/15/2013 1:01:25 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

It was LOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooong and disjointed.

The writing might have succeeded if they had not been lost in a world of krypton rewrite.

In the end it it just an ancient greek mythology ripoff of heracles.

I would say wait for cable/netflix or whatever costs least.

you could check you emails and look for any interesting FR postings DURING the movie and not mis a single relivent point.

It was ok, not ooooh ahhh good.

not a lazy pathetic pseudo rewrite like the Star Trek II reboot.


46 posted on 06/18/2013 2:11:47 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson