[MestaMachine]

Here we go. Have at it.

[MestaMachine]

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.

[hecticskeptic]

Well… some context is obviously needed for Obama’s UN speech. The quote referenced is about ¾ of the way down the text of the speech in a long shopping list of ‘who the future must not belong to’…

The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country’s resources -- it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

I’m not saying I agree or disagree with the comment that this is an ‘evil speech’…. but context means everything when people speak.

[Hemingway's Ghost]

Awesome work.

[Southack]

Holder went after the leaker to the AP in May of 2012.

Benghazi and the video excuse were 9/11/2012.

You were just 5 months off. Not bad for a typical conspiracy theory!

[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

I'm going to have to read this twice to capture all of its nuances. You spent some serious time on this.

Is it possible that Nakoula is being silenced by being kept in jail on bogus parole violation charges because it was the CIA or another agency that took his video and OVER DUBBED IT WITH ANTI-MOHAMMED LANGUAGE so they could then blame the YouTube video for Benghazi?

Is Nakoula a CIA operative? Is he just an innocent casualty in a gov't cover-up?

I'll read again.. Intense stuff.

[PieterCasparzen]

The very first story out of the box is that the vid maker was an 'anonymous' Israeli Jewish billionaire.

To start out analyzing this hypothetical, this first statement is that such was the story that was going to be the administration's PR after the event.

This would then need corroborating written or oral evidence to be absolutely certain that this was the plan.

Of course, us not-inside-the-administration folks can't usually get inside info like that (?@#$@#$), but anyhoo we then try to deduce what's going on with some analysis of other facts. In cases like this, that's something like analyzing just how realistic it would be, how helpful, i.e., just what would different cross sections of America poll like in such a scenario.

I can't help but think that the mainstream press does not often paint Jewish billionaires as terrorists; I can't remember an instance of it. Certainly there are all sorts of conspiracy theories painting practically everyone as terrorists at one time or another, but in terms of US mainstream media, I don't see Jewish, or, for that matter any other billionaires receiving such treatment in the media.

Come to think of it, the dark sides of even the infamous Marc Rich were, as far as I can recall, completely skimmed over by the big networks. And the dude received a Presidential pardon from the Klintoon.

[Paine in the Neck]

‘ll need to digest this more but I think you’re pretty much on target here.

The questions going through my head now are:

Has anyone laid eyes on Nakoula since he got locked up?

Has he been deposed?

Has he been ‘disappeared’?

Another thing still wandering loose in my head is the issue of whether Brennan was running his own op on behalf of the Troika - Obama, Axelrod, Jarrett - that Petreus didn’t have on his radar screen. I can believe Petreus was in on the arms deals but the hostage scheme would have been Brennan. I base this only on my feel for the characters of the two men.

[panzerkamphwageneinz]

There’s a huge hole in this theory. And that is that Obama would look good after a slaughter of our people in Benghazi and that the trading of the blind sheik would rectify that.

He would have lost the election if such a slaughter had occurred. Romney would have eaten him alive and the American people would have seen the truth.

Conspiracies just aren’t containable in regards to secrecy. I don’t doubt the gun running, and Stevens was a necessary casualty of keeping it secret. That explains the Turkish Embassador, and the Turkish Prime Minister being in DC now.

CONTAINMENT

[Jack of all Trades]

mark

[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

Wow, look at this (from 09/11/12).. Our gubmint wasted no time getting out the bogus narrative in the media:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlUFuX_9dwA What a CROCK!!

[jps098]

btt

[exit82]

Dear,I think you have broken the code.

The gunrunning to Syria is well known, but diversion to other AQ and MB factions makes a lot of sense.

Stevens may have thought he was to be kidnapped, not sacrificed. We still do no know WHY Stevens was dispatched to such a dangerous spot and without security.

The truth is at least 36 Americans were going to be sacrificed by this government for unknown reasons—and when they called for help, our military response assets were told to stand down.

That is unforgiveable.

But if the top brass was only following orders, then, Houston, we have a problem. A BIG problem.

[Sirius Lee]

Interesting analysis. Let’s see where this goes.

[bert]

Obama et al need to be gone........

The laws that protect them are no better the the scores of laws they have broken. If there is no law, there is no law

Tit for tat.......

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

How were they going to make it look like Israel was responsible for the attack in Benghazi?

[Grimmy]

This all sets up with what I’ve been assuming since this whole thing jumped off. Thanks for lining it all out like this.

Need moar!

[freds6girlies]

bookmark

[tomkat]

You are one prodigious bulldog lady !

[justa-hairyape]

Very interesting theory. My statement was just pointing out logical inconsistencies. And there are numerous ones within this current government.

So the entire plot was under taken to affect the Israeli elections. That would require that Obama was not worried about his own election. Gee. Wonder if we can find evidence of that. We have Michael Moore berating the President over his lack luster performance during debate #1. And we now know that in addition to the normal Democratic voter fraud, Obama had sicked the IRS on the Tea Party opposition. So yes, one can assume he was not worried about his own election. It was in the bag.

Not sure about the AP story connection though. Can see that the basic ideology of covering up terrorist attacks by either not reporting them or blaming them on something else, was similar between AP and Benghazi.

The dirty little truth is that Obama does not control Islam. He thinks he does, but he does not.

[boxlunch]

Bumped and bookmarked