Posted on 03/16/2013 1:58:53 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Taitz interrupted the panel with birther questions, but was told she was being "inappropriate"
During a panel on Islam and national security by CPAC’s “Uninvited” anti-Islam activists, birther queen Orly Tatiz interrupted the question and answer session by repeatedly asking about President Obama’s birth certificate, and demanding that the panel explain why it wasn’t addressing the topic.
“I think there’s enough substance on this panel, I mean how many topics can you handle,” Pamela Geller, the blogger for Atlas Shrugged, shot back. “Inappropriate. really.”
“We are not a birther site,” the moderator, from Breitbart.com, told Taitz before she was shushed by the crowd. She left the room shortly after.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Wow, that’s impressive!
Russians are great, I also have Russian friends. Moldova is close and a former member state of the Soviet Union but they are ethnically not Russian.
It is NON-VALUE ADDED!!!>>>>>>>>>>>
WRONGO! Its just too effing late, two years ago it could have made a difference. Now its just history that the fact is we have no genuine documentary proof on just who Obama is. Nor do we have ANY genuine documentary evidence on who Obams natural mother is.
Its too late to be an issue. Its just too late.Thats a long way from non value added.
I hope Orly continues to work to get genuine documentation on Obama. It will expose a fraud to history.
i don’t understand how the issue of not being a natural born citizen and being potus can ever go away. seems the only reason folks don’t want to use it against him, is that they have ignored the obvious evidence so long, they don’t want to appear derelict in their duty, for years.
Hear, hear!!
The Breitbart people got the message on February 29, 2012, when Andrew Breitbart was Breitbarted,after meeting with Sheriff Arpaio, and so did the Clintons when Bill Gwatney was shot cold blooded so he could steel the primary away form Killary and Chelsea could be saved. Bill and Kill were totally castrated and so was John Roberts when the Godfather-like Chicago thugs showed up at a secret meeting on January 14, 2009 “and whispered some Godfather words in his ears one week before the most astute chosen justice candidate ever appointed could NOT get the swearing in ceremony done correctly!!!
WHY???
That’s NOT what Carl Gallup is reporting!!!
They all will make sure no one outside that club has all the pieces to put the puzzle together or will be heard or be believed even if they do.
The Clubbers are all fairly safe until death do they part, thanks to that little Mutually Assured Destruction pact of silence.
The power, intimidation and fear they and the two group's partners can project against any and all, at all levels within and around GuvCo, has been more than sufficient to keep things hush hush.
What is Carl Gallup reporting? Also, is this group that Geller was speaking to an auxiliary of CPAC? Were the people that Zullo spoke with likely to be at this event hosted by the Breitbart guy?
I would love it if something came of this!
It’s no strange the media will ALWAYS make Orly Taitz the sacrificed lamb to steer you away form the real issue of NBC, ALWAYS. Don’t fall for it like some “Freepers” = SP always trying!!!
They didn't want to spend the prize money getting a new plaque engraved on their trophy if they had to give it to someone else.
Besides, since we long knew of obama's greatness, if they gave the prize to anyone else, we might think that award and/or the selection process was a sham or that they were racists.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2997574/posts?page=11#11
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2997574/posts?page=23#23
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2997574/posts?page=27#27
How much credibility does 0bama have?
I have been following Taitz for many months and at times encouraged her to keep plowing the field that so many ‘should be’ defenders of the Constitution i.e. Congresspersons and courts should be doing. I believe that many of the ‘should be’ bunch’ have been compromised in one way or another. I have Chief Justice Roberts especially in my mind. Taitz at times has been very strident, even to supporters, in respect to carrying her cause,a cause which I believe has much merit. As shown by the postings here this does not help her in influencing others who might have some empathy let alone derision from others that literally hate her for being on what to them is a beaten path without outcome. As for me every minute that Obama is/has been in office as POTUSA is an abomination as to the Constitution of the USA. Like a physical cancer you do not wait until your doctor or hospital catches up to science to remove the cancer, you seek immediate remedy. I believe that Taitz’s life experiences drives her to march to a different drummer than what the many USA citizens have had to do.
“How much credibility does 0bama have?”
Oh, C’mon TigersEye, what the hell kind of question is that?
Yeah, compared to Obama, Taitz has TONS of credibility.
Happy now?
“Well, I think Orly Taitz deserves a lot of credit for pursuing this issue. There’s really no doubt that Obama is lying about his birth certificate, and that he must have urgent reasons for doing so. He is almost certainly not a natural born citizen, and he may not be a citizen at all.
But I also would agree that this was the wrong forum to raise the issue, since CPAC’s connections to Muslim terrorists, which it refuses to discuss, is also an issue that needs to be dealt with—and it’s not a great idea to mix the two together like that. Now the media will focus on this dispute and ignore the real point of this panel.”
I can agree with that. I sure didn’t mean to get some of you all twisted out of shape when I said Taitz didn’t have any credibility left. No one, outside a handful, even knows who she is! She made an ass out of herself interjecting into the other panel. Why did’t she make her own panel and invite all of you. The birther thing has wasted 5 years...and where has it gotten anyone? There are other fish to fry, you know.
It sure as heck isn’t worth arguing about, I won’t ever come on a ‘birther thread’ again! EXCUSE ME!
It’s the kind of question that should make you consider the value of perceived credibility that exists today. It was not intended as a direct comparison of the two.
They all will make sure none outside that club has all the pieces to put the puzzle together or will be heard or be believed even if they do.
Your last phrase "or will be heard or believed even if they do", sadly is the truth. George Orwell would have had a high old time if he was living and see his forebodings on the all powerful state and a corrupt news media come true.
I must say on viewing your about presentation, that the section on natural born citizen is very informative. It is likely one of the most important questions as to it's definition in my time.
I am sure the Framers of the Constitution were wary of foreign influences within any future president. They were aware of the problems caused in Britain and Europe. Wars galore involving rights of succession etc.
Excuse the ramble.
Press Release:
While at CPAC, Taitz advised former Attorney General Meese that she brought a legal challenge in the Federal Court in California and that the Holder Department of Justice appeared on behalf of the U.S. Congress seeking to dismiss the case, presenting to the judge that the U.S. Congress does not want the court to adjudicate on the merits. Taitz related to Meese that a number of U. S. Representatives and U.S. Senators advised Taitz that when the Department of Justice made such statement, the U.S. Attorneys did not consult with the Congress, that the members of Congress were kept in the dark and that we have now a scandal much bigger than Watergate that involves not only the President, but also the Attorney General and the Department of Justice.
More information and evidence in Grinols et al v Electoral College, U.S. Congress, Biden and Obama and other cases can be found on Orly Taitz ESQ.com. Attorney Taitz is conducting this case pro bono. Neither one of the Plaintiffs was charged any costs or attorneys fees. Taitz is making an enormous effort of traveling to Washington DC repeatedly in order to ascertain whether the Department of Justice advised members of the U.S. Congress that there is such a serious breach of the U.S. National Security, whether members of the U.S. Congress directed the U.S. Attorney to ignore 200 pages of affidavits showing Obama using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number.
Supporters and any and all law abiding U.S. citizens are asked to contact their U.S. Representatives and Senators and demand answers, whether they directed the Department of Justice to act on their behalf, cover up all the evidence and seek dismissal of this case or whether the Department of Justice went behind their backs in order to aid and abet Obama.
We have on our hands a case of the most serious breach of National Security, widespread corruption and High Treason. There are a number of powerful individuals behind this crime, however we absolutely have to win this battle. We have to get the original documents that haven’t been provided in 4 years, we have to get to the truth, we have to end the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency. If we do not win this battle, the repercussions on the U.S. National Security, economy and rights and freedoms of the U.S. citizens will be disastrous for generations to come, possibly irreversible.
CPAC. CPAC. Let’s see, Jeb Bush as keynote speaker, Paul Ryan touting his phony 10 year plan... that CPAC?
Of course any question about the US hating, illegal alien, caliphate building, homosexual, muslim, squatter would be called “inappropriate” by this crowd. Why is anyone surprised?
The eligibility threads here and elsewhere offer a window into what, to me, now looks like the silent, in plain sight, takeover of our country in all the ways that matter: border, elections, money and treasure and the office(s) of power.
What I posted on my FR page, I hoped would supplement what I've learned in grade school and have read here about natural born citizenship, so I'm glad it's helpful.
There are a few serious lawyers, historians and Constitutional scholars, patriots all, who post here, mixed in with those laying down the Alinsky suppression fire and fog.
I find their arguments and the techniques used interesting and helpful to clarify my understanding of this issue and how its being used.
You can tell who the players are, and perhaps some of their motives, if you read enough of them.
Thanks to their civics lessons, their detailing the laws as they actually are, the bits and pieces of historical background you won't hear in school explaining the events, along with the human details, of our nation's founding, I know that what I was taught in the fifth grade, that a natural born citizen is someone born in country to citizen parents, is what that means and what the FFs intended for the single most powerful person in their new Republic.
The second thing I "know", is that I don't know who the guy in the WH really is or if he's eligible or not and no one has any physical data that we all can agree about to show any ordinary citizen/voter who that guy is and when, where and who he came from.
That tells me someone kicked our ass, took us down and we don't know even know it, while they slowly rob us of how ever many trillion a year and steadily infiltrate our borders.
So...what happens when the money runs out, once they've disarmed us?
History says that's when we finally get to meet our masters.
Anyway, rambling begets rambling, I guess, please excuse mine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.