Skip to comments.
'Pastafarian' refuses to take spaghetti strainer off his head for license photo
nj.com ^
| 02/20/2013
| By Anthony G. Attrino/NJ.com
Posted on 02/22/2013 3:08:54 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
SOUTH BRUNSWICK Motor vehicle workers in Dayton called police on a man who insisted on wearing a pasta strainer on his head during the taking of his drivers license photo, according to a police report.
South Brunswick police officers responded to the MVC facility on Route 130 on a call that a man renewing his driver's license refused to remove the strainer on his head, according to a police report. The incident occurred about noon on Saturday, Feb. 2.
The man, Aaron Williams, 25, who gave an Egg Harbor Township address, told motor vehicle workers the strainer was a religious head covering and he had a right to wear it in his drivers license photo.
Williams said he practices Pastafarianism.
Pastafarianism, or the Church of the Flying Spaghettic Monster, is a movement opposing teaching in schools of intelligent design and creationism.
(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...
TOPICS: Food; Religion
KEYWORDS: antitheist; atheist; pastafarian; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Secret Agent Man
Look around. It’s clear the Almighty has a wicked sense of humor.
21
posted on
02/22/2013 3:08:02 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: 0.E.O
Pastafarian heaven with its beer volcanoes and the stripper factory. If that's Pastafarian heaven then I'm going to the wrong church.
22
posted on
02/22/2013 3:11:09 PM PST
by
Drew68
To: Mad Dawgg
It might be this Dork
23
posted on
02/22/2013 3:12:30 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Berlin_Freeper
"I wonder what a tase to his pasta strainer would do."Provide him an excellent basis for a six figure settlement.
24
posted on
02/22/2013 3:19:02 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: Responsibility2nd
I love this for the pure anarchy it represents.
25
posted on
02/22/2013 3:55:01 PM PST
by
wonkowasright
(Wonko from outside the asylum)
To: BenLurkin
It might be this DorkDork?
Dude, the guy is trying to bring attention to the ridiculous government justifications to allow, for example, Muslim women to wear a burka for their Driver's License pictures. I wish there were a few more "dorks" out there like him.
Oh, and the story's two years old already. Where've y'all been?
26
posted on
02/22/2013 4:10:31 PM PST
by
BfloGuy
(Money, like chocolate on a hot oven, was melting in the pockets of the people.)
To: Responsibility2nd
27
posted on
02/22/2013 4:28:36 PM PST
by
Daffynition
(The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. — D.H.)
To: muir_redwoods
not at His expense. humor is fine, but mocking him is another thing. and i would expect adults to know the difference.
28
posted on
02/22/2013 4:34:56 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Secret Agent Man
I know the difference and I’m convinced of my opinion. In fact you’ve just added more evidence.
29
posted on
02/22/2013 4:39:40 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: muir_redwoods
i doubt it, given the people who reference this tend to be atheists because they are openly mocking Christians they believe are stupid at best and the source of the world’s problems, at worst.
believe what youy want.
30
posted on
02/22/2013 4:50:04 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Secret Agent Man
Well bless your little heart for giving me permission to believe as I like.
31
posted on
02/22/2013 4:52:47 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: Paladin2
If hed have only worn a burqa.... Blast -beat Me to it! *grin*
32
posted on
02/22/2013 5:53:56 PM PST
by
Utilizer
(What does not kill you... -can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
To: The Antiyuppie
So, who gets to decide when a religion becomes popular enough to warrant accommodations? Apparently, Obama. According to 99.9 percent of jounalists, media outlets, chief LEOs, and hollywood 'elites'.
Liberal liars are at fault. Politicians are at fault.
But I repeat Myself...
33
posted on
02/22/2013 6:10:08 PM PST
by
Utilizer
(What does not kill you... -can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
To: 0.E.O
Probably send him to Pastafarian heaven with its beer volcanoes and the stripper factory. I'm sold. *grin*
34
posted on
02/22/2013 6:12:45 PM PST
by
Utilizer
(What does not kill you... -can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
To: Secret Agent Man
So it’s against Sharia Law then?
35
posted on
02/22/2013 6:56:06 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
To: Responsibility2nd
He sounds perfectly rational to me, totally normal by today’s standards.
36
posted on
02/22/2013 7:15:31 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: muir_redwoods
To: Responsibility2nd
The guy should be arrested for perjury as it shouldn’t be too hard to ascertain that he is, in fact, an atheist, and a troubled one at that. Which would be hard to reconcile with any religion, particularly one that doesn’t have any measurable congregation.
38
posted on
02/23/2013 5:40:10 AM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
To: The Antiyuppie
Many people in this forum just seem to be missing the point, for some reason. Not me. I get it.
So, who gets to decide when a religion becomes popular enough to warrant accommodations?
A good question. Do you have an answer ?
39
posted on
02/24/2013 6:36:21 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(The monsters are due on Maple Street)
To: UCANSEE2
“So, who gets to decide when a religion becomes popular enough to warrant accommodations?”
A good question. Do you have an answer ?
Yes in fact, I do - none! That is the fairest thing possible and this photo IS for legal identification purposes. I don’t see Jews whining about having to take off their yarmulkes. I can’t even wear my GLASSES when that photo is taken. I like my glasses.
40
posted on
02/24/2013 4:00:09 PM PST
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson