Thanks. Very handy.
But of course the conspiracy theorists will just consider it an expansion of the conspiracy. They will never deviate from their chosen narrative.
My main concern is with the lack of a footprint Lanza left online.
To be honest, the only people still talking about it are the lefties. The truth is that nobody has heard much about that incident as far as facts go since the incident.
The perp is dead, so I can’t see why we have no more detail.
There will be no trial, right?
I never heard of this before as “conspiracy theory” but I did note that someone on GOA gun forum commented that it was odd that the predominance of the political elite pushing gun control might of had ancestors in the Holocaust . The point being made was that in view of gun control by Nazis that you would think the Jewish would be the last to push gun control in the US.
IMHO, the real conspiracy is the liberal mindset that, when trying to come to grips with this horror, ran to the shelter of “gun control” rather than prayer for the souls of the victims.
Sure.
Show me the crime scene photos with all those little brass thingies on the floor. With closeups.
THEN talk to me.
What? They’re not available?
Really.
Salon’s attempt to ridicule the right and paper over the horrible job that the MSM did covering this event.
It is no wonder that questions are asked about what happened and when.
But in this day of Lance Armstrong, Manti Te’o, “No Jeeps will be made overseas”, and lack of answers forthcoming on Benghazi, I think a healthy dose of skepticism is warranted in ANYONE of sound mind.......if THEY put it out there, let THEM justify it. Alot of times, THEY can’t.....
Who ran from police instead of just showing identifying himself. Sorry but it doesn't pass the smell test.
Given the media's lack of curiosity about Lanza's background and the 2nd runners ID I'm going to put on my tinfoil and posit that Lanza was "handled" as part of a MKULTRA type program at worst, and at the very least a "known" loose screw whose intentions were picked up by NSA and whose communications made it through all the right filters to a human analyst who then either sat on the info or was told to by a higher up in the administration.
FYI
Perhaps you can get your questions answered here.
Lost in all of this is the police response time which has been reported as long as 20 munutes.
Salon “where the effete meet to bleat” does not go into speculation about motive outside of the fact that the kid was nuts. There’s a diversion going on about what was going on in that kids twisted mind. Expending as many rounds as he did in his victims he definetly meant to kill not maim.
Was he “executing” them or was he “saving” them in his twisted mind ? There is a difference. Also not mentioned examining what medications he was on and the examination of what was in his computer.
The main underlying reason for the conspiracy theories is the complete lack of trust in the MSM, in my opinion. We saw how they helped the Obama agenda with Benghazi. So when the MSM gets parts of the story wrong with Sandy Hook, it will happen that people will think something is amiss. And especially when so many members of the MSM turn around and use Sandy Hook to blatantly shill for gun grabbing.
The Parker thing is very disturbing. He was definitely acting. A false flag conspiracy is one plausible explanation. Coincidence theorists like the author look foolish to me - running around plugging holes in the dyke. This is a coincidence, that’s a coincidence, the next fifty weird things about the case are all coincidences. And none of the coincidence theorists give any real accounting to the perennial question - “Qui Bono.” It’s all very convenient politically speaking And it also doesn’t take into account the fact that MSM routinely lies for Obama (Fast and Furious, Ben Ghazi, inflated economic numbers). Occam’s Razor, folks. We go with the theory that explains the most facts the most elegantly until another, better theory is found. Coincidence theories are very weak here. The false flag theory is much stronger. The scientific method requires that we proceed under the assumption that the false flag theory is true, until proven otherwise. In other words, the burden of proof has shifted for the government to prove its innocence.
“But there was another man in the woods (maybe): Eyewitnesses saw a second man in the woods wearing camouflage pants and a dark jacket, and said that he may have been armed. Must be a second shooter.
Answer: Actually, he was, according to the Newtown Bee, “an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town” who heard the gunfire.”
Well this is the first I have heard of this explanation. A bit odd that an off duty cop from another town would 1 be there, 2 wearing camo, and 3 running from the real police... no? What was his name?
Drug addicts and alchololics always will be able to rationalize crazy behavior.
I don’t believe the official SandyHook story because of what I know about FEMA drills and because the official coverage is nothing that a rational person could digest.
The author is a far leftist puke, did you know that?