Replies

But then, will you deviate from your chosen narrative that there can’t possibly be a conspiracy.

I submit that there is a great possibility that there is a conspiracy ...but not that Sandy Hook was a hoax.

Parker’s behavior is odd. Someone here said he exhibited classic signs of the same disorder that I believe Obama has and it involves a Personality Disorder

So why have the sister wear the same dress that you know you posted on Facebook. There are few reasons that it would make psychological sense. Even if the girl wanted to wear it -common sense would tell you not to do it. For a number of reasons. If she wanted to wear one of her sister’s dresses - I am sure there were others.

That photo does look photoshopped as it pertains to the legs but that could be explained even if photoshopped.

Slate references a rumor started by Sorcha Faal (not his real name) I am on the fence as to whether Faal is a disinformation specialist, a dem operative , or an internet hoax prankster. His articles get picked up by other sites and then they usually end up on FR.

Harken back to the idea that it is quite possible that David Axelrod ginned up the birth certificate controversy in order to hide something else. If so, he was a genius to do it because everyone steers away from anything to do with Obama’s identity because they don’t want to be considered a nut.As for Orly Taitz - something is off about her, too. Or maybe she is just a really bad lawyer.

Same exact disinformation campaign could be taking place with Sandy Hook.

The political arena has long operated on disinformation campaigns.

Actually, most of this stuff in the article is just "explanations" with no real proof of anything, except for the gun parts. The Bushmaster was definitely the gun used by the shooter. However, even with these explanations doesn't mean this wasn't a put up job by the dimwits in order to pass their gun grabbing laws. In fact I believe that over the past 50 years or so more than one "mass shooting" was the work of left wing operatives with the intention of passing ever more restrictive gun laws.

Too many things point to this being true. Color me a conspiracy nut if you wish, but these things happen to often during a big push for gun control for them all to be done by "just some nut job".

Example: Big push in the early sixties for mail order guns to be outlawed. Bingo, President Kennedy is shot by a guy using(guess what) a mail order firearm. Before that they couldn't find an examples of mail order guns being used in crimes, at least not many. Now they had something solid to shove down our throats.

Like wise his brother was shot by a "Saturday night special" just when a big push to outlaw cheap firearms was going on. Viola, we were blessed with the 1968 firearms act.

Call me crazy if you wish, but too many such incidents have happened just when the big push for certain firearms restrictions was on. Remember what triggered the first so called "assault weapon" ban? It was a school shooting in Stockton CA by a released felon using a semi-auto(I think an M15)military look alike. Once again we have something very similar happening with the latest "assault weapons" gun grabbing attempt. Anyone who thinks all this sh** is just a coincidence needs to open their eyes. None of the stuff in this article disproves my(and many others)theory that the dimwits(communist)are behind these shooting, including the accidental discharges at 3 gun show yesterday.