[Gluteus Maximus]

The Parker thing is very disturbing. He was definitely acting. A false flag conspiracy is one plausible explanation. Coincidence theorists like the author look foolish to me - running around plugging holes in the dyke. This is a coincidence, that’s a coincidence, the next fifty weird things about the case are all coincidences. And none of the coincidence theorists give any real accounting to the perennial question - “Qui Bono.” It’s all very convenient politically speaking And it also doesn’t take into account the fact that MSM routinely lies for Obama (Fast and Furious, Ben Ghazi, inflated economic numbers). Occam’s Razor, folks. We go with the theory that explains the most facts the most elegantly until another, better theory is found. Coincidence theories are very weak here. The false flag theory is much stronger. The scientific method requires that we proceed under the assumption that the false flag theory is true, until proven otherwise. In other words, the burden of proof has shifted for the government to prove its innocence.

[bitterohiogunclinger]

“The Parker thing is very disturbing. He was definitely acting.”
There are many actions involving the relatives of those killed that are disturbing. I realize that those grieving behave bizarrely, but way too many of them are smiling and yukking it up on camera. What became of the “Gene Rosen” interviews? None of what he said makes any sense at all.

[drjimmy]

Coincidence theorists like the author look foolish to me - running around plugging holes in the dyke. This is a coincidence, that’s a coincidence, the next fifty weird things about the case are all coincidences. And none of the coincidence theorists give any real accounting to the perennial question - “Qui Bono.” It’s all very convenient politically speaking

And yet you fail to see the absolute irony of your last sentence, in light of all the sentences that come before it.