Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Your comprehensive answer to every Sandy Hook conspiracy theory
Infowars, Rense, Natural News, Before Its News, Salon.com ^ | January 18, 2013 | Alex Seitz-Wald

Posted on 01/20/2013 6:13:45 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Uncle Chip

“didn’t have to go to the moon or the bottom of the ocean to get them or some other esoteric source. They are all publicly available and incontrovertible”

If you are addressing me and suggesting that have not taken the time, looking at esoteric sources for answers to legitimate and practical questions or wondering about the incident one month later, check yourself. Many questions I have asked do not have publically, incontrovertible answers.

Furthermore, as for incontrovertibility, I question the veracity of what I hear, see or read from news or law enforcement, given that the chief law enforcement officer of this country offers up false choices and patently inaccurate causation as truth. Apparently, so do you, given thatn you used the word “probably” in your response to me.

If you don’t want to answer my questions about whether you work for the 0bama administration, 0bama for Action, or any arm of the above organizations, that’s ok. I understand.


41 posted on 01/20/2013 9:22:24 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

That footage is of Chris Manfredonia, a parent with a child in the school, not this off-duty police officer.


42 posted on 01/20/2013 9:24:25 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Drug addicts and alchololics always will be able to rationalize crazy behavior.

I don’t believe the official SandyHook story because of what I know about FEMA drills and because the official coverage is nothing that a rational person could digest.


43 posted on 01/20/2013 9:24:47 AM PST by Truth2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

No, it wasn’t.


44 posted on 01/20/2013 9:28:15 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

I did answer it. “No” was that answer.

Why is an answer to a question so hard to accept.


45 posted on 01/20/2013 9:29:54 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

And you know that how???


46 posted on 01/20/2013 9:33:36 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I wanted confirmation.


47 posted on 01/20/2013 9:36:15 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Chris M. was with police in front of the fire house, not at the school. He was not wearing camo. We already ran this to ground in another thread where you were grasping at straws to protect the Government’s credibility in this case.


48 posted on 01/20/2013 9:38:42 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

And my answer is not???


49 posted on 01/20/2013 9:49:27 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

In actuality, of course, none of us are ‘confirmed’ on this or any site.


50 posted on 01/20/2013 9:53:47 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

IIRC you posted a picture of the police speaking with the person who could very well be that off duty police officer. He was wearing khaki camo pants. Is that what you are referring to???

I asked you if that was Chris Manfredonia and you never answered.

Post the picture here so people can see what you are referring to.


51 posted on 01/20/2013 9:55:31 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

So then why are you asking for it and then pouting that you didn’t get it???


52 posted on 01/20/2013 9:58:32 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“My main concern is with the lack of a footprint Lanza left online.”

My guess (and it’s ONLY a guess) is that he didn’t -leave- much or any of a “footprint” online.

Keep in mind that Adam Lanza had more than one developmental problems that even seemed to be physical. He had some variation of Asperger’s Syndrome. On top of that, he had some kind of problem in “feeling pain” (recall the comments by someone from Newtown High School that they were hesitant to permit him to using a soldering iron in the Tech Club because he might burn himself unknowingly. Also recall that Nancy Lanza had remarked to someone she knew that she had found him trying to burn himself with a cigarette lighter.)

Because of the nature of Asperger’s, Adam would shy away from contact with others (remark that when he walking down the hall in school, if someone was coming towards him he would press towards the wall and hold tightly whatever was in his hands).

I’ll guess that this unwillingness (or more correctly, his lack of ability) to interact with others in the real world extended to his online experience. He may have browsed quite a bit, but at the same time been mostly “a lurker” and left little evidence of his presence anywhere.

Just my thoughts. I could be completely wrong.


53 posted on 01/20/2013 9:59:50 AM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

The only conspiracy here is one to make otherwise intelligent people look like heartless lunatics.


54 posted on 01/20/2013 10:04:19 AM PST by 1912comeback (Forever Forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2978643/posts

Posts 175-176. It is clearly Chris wearing khaki pants. Someone else made the opinion that they were khaki camo, not me. Doesn’t make sense to me to wear khaki camo pants with dress shoes, which oh by the way don’t appear to be in condition to have just run through the woods.

Link is the best I can to on my tablet. Can’t figure out how to get the properties to post the pics.


55 posted on 01/20/2013 10:06:15 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Here is what you posted. Is this the off duty officer or Manfredonia or someone else???

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2978643/posts?page=175#175


56 posted on 01/20/2013 10:06:32 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Clearly Mafredonia. What was the off duty police officer’s name?


57 posted on 01/20/2013 10:14:29 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
You mean the same 911 call that lists a cop claiming that he found a rifle and a shotgun in the school? Is this a different shotgun then the one they pulled out of Lanza's trunk hours later after nightfall?

9:55:25: “Be advised, we have multiple weapons. One rifle and a shotgun”

58 posted on 01/20/2013 10:23:20 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Bathhouse Barry wants YOU to bend over for another four years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
Clearly Mafredonia.

So then this statement of yours at Post #48 is not true:

"Chris M. was with police in front of the fire house, not at the school. He was not wearing camo."

Because those are khaki camo pants that he is wearing and that is the school parking lot that they are standing on from the appearance of the patches on the asphalt.

59 posted on 01/20/2013 10:24:02 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: dforest

There will be no trial, right?

unless there was a conspiracy or more than one shooter..makes one wonder doesnt it?


60 posted on 01/20/2013 10:28:21 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson