1 posted on
12/09/2012 1:56:32 PM PST by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
I thought it looked closer than 434 light-years away.
:~ )
2 posted on
12/09/2012 1:58:35 PM PST by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: BenLurkin
No wonder I get lost all the time. I’ve been correcting for 434 light-years of parallax, not 323 light-years.
To: BenLurkin
(clickable)
4 posted on
12/09/2012 2:05:27 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, you've likely misread the situation.)
To: BenLurkin
Scientists can change things anytime they want. They learn more, they adjust the theory, they move on. It's no big deal -- this is how science is done.
But if anyone else comes along and asks a question, it's -- "Hey, you moron! This is settled science! This is beyond dispute! Don't tell me what you believe -- I've got facts!"
That is, until they find new facts and have to change the science again. But it's OK. That's how science is done.
5 posted on
12/09/2012 2:18:01 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Republicans have made themselves useless, toothless, and clueless.)
To: BenLurkin
If it blew up today, would we see it in our lifetime?
To: BenLurkin
Crap. Now I have to readjust my whole life.
12 posted on
12/09/2012 3:01:28 PM PST by
Doomonyou
(Let them eat Lead.)
To: BenLurkin
Just goes to show that sometimes it doesn't pay to cut corners. The Europeans thought that they could save a bit of money by dropping the second H in Hipparchos and calling the satellite Hipparcos, but as a result they got less reliable information.
On the other hand, the fact this comes from a Russian source makes me a bit suspicious. If the light from Polaris is 323 years old, it started on its way here in the year 1689--the first year of the reign of Peter the Great. If Polaris is 434 light-years away, on the other hand, the light started on its way here in 1578, a year when the Russians were defeated by the Swedes.
May be some Russian chauvinism involved.
To: BenLurkin
Now there's a difference that makes a difference...
To: BenLurkin
OMG!!!! WE'RE DOOOOOOOOOOOMED!!!!
18 posted on
12/09/2012 3:59:26 PM PST by
left that other site
(Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
To: BenLurkin
According to my calculations it is 347 light years away.
19 posted on
12/09/2012 4:02:42 PM PST by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: BenLurkin
434 downsized to 323?
Hmmm....
This could all be due to deflation, where even our money ain’t worth what it used to be some 10 years ago.
On the positive side, a savings of 30% would mean that, the amount of fuel (and cost) to get to Polaris, would be a lot less.
Also, what else could be the scientists be wrong about? Is it possible that, even the universe is 30% smaller than the current estimates?
21 posted on
12/09/2012 4:21:15 PM PST by
adorno
(Y)
To: BenLurkin
No wonder the polar ice cap is melting.......
24 posted on
12/09/2012 5:20:52 PM PST by
Red Badger
(Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson