I do not think that Glück is going to last in his position for much longer.
1 posted on
11/23/2012 7:18:37 PM PST by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Isn’t that a matter between the priest and the church isn’t it? The reasons those who want to change the rules use in the arguments are totally bogus of course.
2 posted on
11/23/2012 7:20:56 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: Olog-hai
1 Timothy 4 The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron. They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth. For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer. And decreeing "oh, you can marry, but then we won't let you serve God beyond this line" is still forbidding marriage.
3 posted on
11/23/2012 7:23:58 PM PST by
ctdonath2
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
To: Olog-hai
1 Timothy 4 The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron. They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth. For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer. And decreeing "oh, you can marry, but then we won't let you serve God beyond this line" is still forbidding marriage.
4 posted on
11/23/2012 7:23:58 PM PST by
ctdonath2
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
To: Olog-hai
Form your own church then.
6 posted on
11/23/2012 7:27:18 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Labor unions are the Communist Party of the USA.)
To: Olog-hai
Even though vocations are low in many western countries. The reason for few ordinations is not due to the issue of celibacy.
The issue is rather fathers, mothers, and pastors who don’t seriously suggest to young unmarried men that they might have a vocation.
It is actually a duty of Catholics to recognize when someone could make a good priest, and tell him.
7 posted on
11/23/2012 7:29:16 PM PST by
Bayard
To: Olog-hai
Why not? They have been turning a blind eye to priests having sex with boys for decades.
8 posted on
11/23/2012 7:30:18 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Why is the government more concerned about protecting a microbe on Mars than an unborn baby here?)
To: Olog-hai
Who says they are not already having sex.... most of them...
Nuns too...
9 posted on
11/23/2012 7:31:39 PM PST by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
What is “the Central Committee for Catholics”? The article calls it a “lay organization,” but does not explain further.
It sounds curiously similar to the Central Committee of any Communist state.
12 posted on
11/23/2012 7:52:29 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Olog-hai
...and then the Rabi says, “It sure beats a ham sandwich, doesn’t it?”
13 posted on
11/23/2012 8:18:30 PM PST by
null and void
(America - Abducted by Aliens...)
To: Olog-hai
Never heard of this guy in my life. Title is misleading, if not dishonest.
14 posted on
11/23/2012 8:46:19 PM PST by
mgist
To: Olog-hai
Never heard of this guy in my life. Title is misleading, if not dishonest.
16 posted on
11/23/2012 8:48:04 PM PST by
mgist
To: Olog-hai
“Let priests have sex”? Given the number of homosexuals in the priestly ranks it would seem they do already.
And with a long history of concubinage they always have.
18 posted on
11/23/2012 8:59:06 PM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Olog-hai
“Let priests have sex”? Given the number of homosexuals in the priestly ranks it would seem they do already.
And with a long history of concubinage they always have.
19 posted on
11/23/2012 9:05:49 PM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Olog-hai
There are lots of married African priests and bishops. The church just looks the other way.
20 posted on
11/23/2012 9:11:26 PM PST by
QBFimi
(When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
To: Olog-hai
If they will have sex, have them marry. Else they become “Johns” in the “brothel” of casual sex partners.
27 posted on
11/24/2012 3:15:54 AM PST by
trebb
(Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
To: Salvation; NYer
29 posted on
11/24/2012 7:02:34 AM PST by
verga
(A nation divided by Zero!)
To: Olog-hai
How about changing the headline?
Leading Catholic CINO: Let priests have sex,
31 posted on
11/24/2012 12:37:00 PM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Olog-hai
Great example of my tagline.
36 posted on
11/25/2012 5:35:58 PM PST by
CityCenter
(Compromise is the welcome mat to deception.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson