Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: If Obama loses can he still be impeached?

Posted on 10/31/2012 11:30:10 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55

Say Obama loses the election and then these emails that Gingrich are talking about surface. And then eventually the videos come out.

Obama has LIED to the American people just like Clinton. Even though he wouldn't be around can elected officials still vote to impeach him? Even though it wouldn't be knocking him out of office per se? Just a mark on his record?

What are the ramifications of impeachment?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: impeach; impeachment; impeachobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2012 11:30:11 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

he can be impeached right up to the last day in office


2 posted on 10/31/2012 11:32:18 AM PDT by revivaljoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Or would they have hearings to try and convict him of treason?


3 posted on 10/31/2012 11:32:26 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

House of Representatives can indict; Senate is the jury....Bill Clinton was impeached and found innocent by the Senate. A bunch of no-ball bastards.


4 posted on 10/31/2012 11:33:10 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Yes, technically but to what end? The purpose of impeachment is to remove a corrupt official from office. There’s no point when the official will be leaving in two months anyway. No point in wasting time with comittee hearings, votes, a trial in the senate, etc.


5 posted on 10/31/2012 11:33:20 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Wouldn’t seem practical or worthwhile. Congress would have to do it in a lame duck session, and the Senate would never go along in either case. With just a few months left in his presidency, it would be spun as Congress wasting the people’s time.

I think better is to just keep this in the headlines throughout the lame duck months and disgrace this guy as much as possible as his presidency winds down...


6 posted on 10/31/2012 11:34:00 AM PDT by lquist1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Well I was just wondering because if there are hearings, etc.. then could he be called to testify?

And could this testimony cause problems for O during a criminal trial?


7 posted on 10/31/2012 11:35:13 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Without conviction it is an asterisk.

Forget it.


8 posted on 10/31/2012 11:35:40 AM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Wrong-doing must always be prosecuted, even if the perpetrator got away. Otherwise, we set the precedent that you can engage in all kinds of malfeasance while in office, and that you can get off scot free when you leave office.


9 posted on 10/31/2012 11:35:54 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lquist1

I think there needs to be hearings on this though?

How could Congressman and Senators begin treason proceedings?


10 posted on 10/31/2012 11:36:38 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

That’s my line of thought as well. He needs to be punished in some form or fashion by the justice system to deter others from this kind of activity.


11 posted on 10/31/2012 11:38:27 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

The odds on Obama gettign impeached if he loses is zero.

(1) It taskes several months to get an impeachment process going. Not enough time left to make it happen.
(2) The libs would portray it as the Right just piling on and try to make the Repubs look like bad guys (they’d try to do that anyway but this would just give them more ammunition).
(3) Nobody wants to be the one to impeach the first black (or half black) President.
(4) The Repubs would be just as happy to have this thing hang around Obama’s and the DemoCRAPs necks for as long a they can.

Again.... ain’t gonna happen. I wish it would but... ain’t gonna happen.


12 posted on 10/31/2012 11:39:39 AM PDT by BFM (CLINTON is and always will be a rapist. Never forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

a more pertinent question is, can he pardon himself?


13 posted on 10/31/2012 11:40:11 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Actually, Article I, Section 3, 7 says:

“Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.”

Sounds to me like they can impeach anybody who is currently enjoying an office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. I would think that having the lifetime title of “President”, as well as a pension, would qualify an ex-President to be impeached in order to remove those things.


14 posted on 10/31/2012 11:40:32 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

He could not be called to testify.

He could choose to testify but he wouldn’t.

Seperation of powers.

The House is entirely alone in the proceeding. The defenders of Obama in the House would be the House Democrat leadership and their chosen henchmen.

Obama won’t be impeached. Obama won’t be prosecuted. So it’s a moot point.


15 posted on 10/31/2012 11:41:32 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". (Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Ah good catch!


16 posted on 10/31/2012 11:41:55 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Impeachment Charge: Assassination of Ambassador Stephens. Motive: Prevent release of Presidential data related to funding and arming Moslem Brotherhood.


17 posted on 10/31/2012 11:42:59 AM PDT by Tugo (Romney & Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Impeachment maybe not.. but prosecution I think is still possible. I wouldn’t rule that out because we do not yet know all of the evidence.

There are emails, audio recordings and videos that the public has not yet seen.


18 posted on 10/31/2012 11:43:23 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I’m gonna say no. Look at what happened with Nixon. Instead of pardoning himself his successor did it.


19 posted on 10/31/2012 11:44:41 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Impeachment is not to be used for prosecution. It is for the removal of an official only. After removal, without the shroud of power over him, an elected official is fully subject to prosecution of any crimes.


20 posted on 10/31/2012 11:44:59 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson