I was a strong Lance supporter for as long as I could find something to hold on to and a reason to believe him. The evidence to the contrary has moved me.
The NYT is guilty of doping the news they publish.
I read somewhere that he’d passed every official test, for many years. Now, I’ve recently read that the USADA has all kinds of negative drug test results, witness testimony etc, for evidence. I honestly don’t know what to believe, but I’m getting very skeptical of LA altogether.
I was a strong Lance supporter for as long as I could find something to hold on to and a reason to believe him. The evidence to the contrary has moved me.
Another conspiracy.
I’ll bet that this story gets more coverage than the Libya attack and cover up.
I don’t give a rats arse about some dumb jock cheating while he road his bicycle for a living.
Weasel Armstrong is one of the greatest frauds in the history of sports. Pure slimebag.
and still nothing from Lance Armstrong.
It looks like the ghosts of Armstrong’s past bullying may be coming back to haunt him:
London (CNN) — London’s Sunday Times is considering suing Lance Armstrong over a libel case he brought against the newspaper over doping allegations which resulted in a costly payout.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/13/sport/armstrong-doping-sunday-times/index.html
I have a little trouble believing a team that was cheating by doping would discuss their cheating in front of other people who weren’t part of it. It would take a lot of smarts, and an understanding of secrecy, to pull off a multi-year team-wide doping program, and that is the opposite of what is described by this woman.
And while I have no idea if Armstrong is guilty of anything or not, I firmly believe that you could get dozens of people to lie about something. That’s pretty much the standard practice of the elected democrats these days, even the “good ones”.
So I don’t find 20 “personal testimonies” much more compelling than 1. Firm evidence. The biggest problem the pro-doping-believer crowd has to overcome is the ability of an entire team to apparently thwart the active doping regime, WHILE almost every other team kept having their stars nailed.
I believe in American exceptionalism, but i don’t believe that Team Postal Service would have been uniquely qualified to beat the drug tests. And if it was this easy to do, no way Landis would have been caught.
Saw this today:
http://www.nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/49406637/ns/sports-cycling/
Here’s a link to an interview of Emma O’Reilly:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-15/interview-with-emma-oreilly/4310066
Part of the interview was used in the Australian Broadcasting Corporation television program “The World According to Lance”. Here’s a link to a webpage with that program. There are a few other videos on that page related to the television program as well.
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2012/10/11/3608613.htm