Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Democrat party does as much as it can to get rid of power generation in CA except when it directly serves them.
1 posted on 08/05/2012 12:11:41 PM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jwsea55

What a stunningly idiotic idea.


2 posted on 08/05/2012 12:17:12 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (OWS = The Great American Snivel War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

Let them drink Perrier.


3 posted on 08/05/2012 12:19:10 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

Power for me but not for thee.

They’re going to retrofit two dams in Ann Arbor Michigan with generators. Its the other 3000 dams in the state that need to come out.


6 posted on 08/05/2012 12:23:00 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

Power generation and drinking water....

SO how’s will they take if they remove their source???


8 posted on 08/05/2012 12:23:36 PM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

The scary thing it that SF will vote to get rid of its water supply, then it will go to court to take somebody else’s water. Let’s not even start with the lost electrical power.


9 posted on 08/05/2012 12:24:04 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

They oughta put the useless Yosemite under water too, no? More water for everybody.


10 posted on 08/05/2012 12:27:31 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

LOL this is too funny.

They can replace the electric power with coal plants or just do without and have brown-outs. They can just do without the water like the farmers they screwed had to do.

Plus, they shouldn’t complain about extra $2,777 per household a year that their water will cost it’s less than Obamacare will cost them.


15 posted on 08/05/2012 12:36:21 PM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55
From the story.

On one side are Republican lawmakers and environmentalists, including Ronald Reagan's former interior secretary, who want the dam removed and valley restored. On the other are Democratic San Franciscans, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, fighting to hold onto the city's famously pure drinking water in a drought-prone state.

The oh so saintly republicans are doing this.
19 posted on 08/05/2012 12:46:30 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

Not sure you gain all that much, other than another place to put tourist attractions and the valley will be silt.

20 posted on 08/05/2012 12:50:34 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Obamaid has to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55
The time for this decision was 100 years ago, when it still could have been implemented at a reasonable cost. While I tend to side with John Muir on the matter, it's a little too late to turn back the clock at this point, at least if the welfare of the inhabitants of the Bay Area is foremost in mind.

The bill in question directs the city to "devise a plan", and if this is anything like other eco-fantasy pipe dreams that's going to be quite a plan. They will follow it at their peril, and it shouldn't be up to the rest of us to bail them out when the cost of feeling good about themselves starts to become apparent.

Nevertheless, so long as the recourse isn't simply to pull power from the grid elsewhere, and expropriate other people's water, then I say go for it. Its proponents may find that "sustainable" really does have a meaning.

23 posted on 08/05/2012 12:56:43 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

So these lunatics are going to vote to eliminate their own water supply. Is there a downside to this?

Pray for America


26 posted on 08/05/2012 12:59:05 PM PDT by bray (If you vote for a Communist, what's that make you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55
These people must be insane..... It will take decades for the valley to be restored to it's natural beauty.....

Not to speak of the higher cost associated with water and power that goes with no longer using the resource for dirt cheap ....$30,000 a year... Liberalism is a mental disorder....

36 posted on 08/05/2012 1:25:12 PM PDT by Popman (In a place you only dream of Where your soul is always free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

At the same time this $14 billion water project to drain the Sacramento Delta sending more water southward is in the works:

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/jul/25/california-embarks-on-massive-water-project/


43 posted on 08/05/2012 1:44:24 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

When they undam the valley, the years and years of silt buildup will go down stream and destroy all the fish all the way to the sea.

But hey, California has Billions of dollars in the bank to go replace perfectly good power and water systems for the fun of it right?


49 posted on 08/05/2012 2:03:02 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55
San Francisco Hypocrite Alert: Yosemite's lost valley will be subject of vote

The most common things in the universe are ignorance and stupidity. San Francisco leads on both counts. Perversion-addled brains may contribute to the problem.

San Francisco County has a watershed (in terms of ueful water supply for humans) of exactly zero.

I lived the first third of my life in SF.
I will probably live the final third of my life in the California Central Valley, which is on its way to becoming a dust bowl, thanks to the actions and inaction of the arrogant Dianne Feinstein.

Perhaps a similar fate would be a good irony for Sodom-by-the-Bay.

51 posted on 08/05/2012 2:13:18 PM PDT by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

It will be a silty mess that no one will be able to “enjoy” for many years. SoCalEd drained one of its reservoirs in the sierra for maintenance on a 90 year old dam. It looked like a barren moonscape. No one was allowed down there, all access was blocked, to protect “native sites”. Yeah, the real reason is because they didn’t want to be liable for some nimrod who might get mired in the muck down there.


61 posted on 08/05/2012 4:10:47 PM PDT by gracie1 (Look, just because you have to tolerate something doesnÂ’t mean you have to approve of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

So, you drain a dam that provides water for a water starved state.

You hope to uncover another Yosemite.

After 80 years, you find said valley covered in 100 feet of silt.

What now libs? Drink sewer water, bitches!


63 posted on 08/05/2012 4:40:47 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

First mega taxes, then the bullet train, now dumping all the water for the Bay Area.

Al Qaida couldn’t do a better job of destroying California than the Democrats.


64 posted on 08/05/2012 5:15:59 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55

I pray that the commie lib idiots of San Francisco vote to slit their throats by eliminating their primary source of clean drinking water. I am praying for it.

When they can’t secure water for people to drink, I’m going to celebrate with a bottle of champagne and a night of raucous laughter.

Stupidity should never go unrewarded.


66 posted on 08/06/2012 12:39:54 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jwsea55
I used to live in San Francisco. It has some of the best quality water and most reliable supply.
They now want to undo that; not surprising to hear.

I'm sure the valley is a beautiful place; but water for humans is kind of an important thing!

70 posted on 08/06/2012 8:05:55 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Encourage all of your Democrat friends to get out and vote on November 7th, the stakes are high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson