Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Fun­da­men­tals No Longer Apply, Review the Fundamentals
advisoranalyst.com ^ | 4/27/2012 | Eric Sprott, David Baker

Posted on 04/29/2012 4:59:06 PM PDT by Signalman

This may not come as a sur­prise, but we're still not see­ing it. We're not see­ing a US recovery.

Here we are, well into 2012, and the fact remains that the US hous­ing sit­u­a­tion is still a bust. There is sim­ply no hous­ing recov­ery hap­pen­ing in the United States. US New Home Sales fell for the fourth time in a row month-overmonth in March, rep­re­sent­ing a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 328,000, down from 353,000 in Feb­ru­ary.1 Do you know what the annual rate of New Home Sales was back in 2006? About 1.21 mil­lion.2 No recov­ery there.

Same goes for US Exist­ing Home Sales, which fell unex­pect­edly by 2.6% in March to an annual rate of 4.48 mil­lion units.3 Again — would you care to know where they were in the same month back in 2006, before the finan­cial sys­tem fell apart? Approx­i­mately 6.92 mil­lion units.4 No recov­ery there either.

Then there's unem­ploy­ment. Judg­ing by all the recent earnings-release cheer­lead­ing, March's jobs num­bers seem to have been for­got­ten, but they were plainly weak. The US Labor Depart­ment showed US hir­ing slow­ing to a mere 120,000 new jobs in March, below expec­ta­tions of 200,000+.5 That's not a recov­ery. That's sim­ply weak data.

Same goes for the most recent job­less claims num­bers, which have been run­ning above 380,000 for the last two weeks, above the 375,000 thresh­old that sup­pos­edly sig­nals future unem­ploy­ment increases.6 Again — this is not pos­i­tive data, this is weak data. How high will it have to go before the econ­o­mists admit that it's weak? 400,000? 425,000? We're ask­ing — we'd like to know.

Then there are US tax receipts, which con­tinue to point in the same direc­tion. If the US is recov­er­ing so strongly, then why are employ­ment tax receipts only up 2%? ($484 bil­lion fis­cal year-to-date as of March 2012 vs. $475 bil­lion over the same period to March 2011).7 A 2% increase is explain­able by infla­tion alone, which was last reported run­ning at 2.7% accord­ing to the Bureau of Labour Stas­tics.8 Shouldn't the tax receipts be much higher than that? Wasn't unem­ploy­ment down so far this year? As the Asso­ci­ated Press plainly states, "The unem­ploy­ment rate has fallen to 8.2% in March [2012] from 9.1% in August [2011]. Part of the drop was because peo­ple gave up look­ing for work. Peo­ple who are out of work but not look­ing for jobs aren't counted among the unem­ployed."9 Oh! Sorry,… now the num­bers make more sense. There hasn't been any net new employ­ment at all. Ques­tion: if every­one "gives up" look­ing for work next week, will the US unem­ploy­ment rate go to zero? We're ask­ing — we'd like to know.

Other eco­nomic indi­ca­tors exhibit the same down­ward momen­tum that the pun­dits are loath to acknowl­edge. For exam­ple, the Eco­nomic Cycle Research Institute's (ECRI) Weekly Lead­ing Indi­ca­tor index, which had been ris­ing from its 2011 lows ear­lier this year, has resumed its down­trend in April.10 More recently, US Durable Goods Orders were revealed to have dropped 4.2% in March, rep­re­sent­ing the largest decline since Jan­u­ary 2009.11 To top it all off, China's most recent Pur­chas­ing Man­agers Index (PMI) indi­cated that China's man­u­fac­tur­ing activ­ity has now been in con­trac­tion for six months in a row.12

Mean­while, the sit­u­a­tion in Europe con­tin­ues to worsen. There's no point in minc­ing words: Spain is a com­plete dis­as­ter. This past week, the Span­ish gov­ern­ment man­aged to pull off two sep­a­rate bond auc­tions, only to have the yield on their 10-year gov­ern­ment bond shoot right back up the moment the sec­ond auc­tion closed. Everyone's ner­vous because the Span­ish bank­ing sys­tem is up to its eye­balls in approx­i­mately €143.8 bil­lion worth of delin­quent loans, and the pri­vate sec­tor is unwill­ing to lend Span­ish banks the money to weather the poten­tial write-downs.13 As we've seen before, the real cul­prit plagu­ing the Span­ish banks is cus­tomer deposit with­drawals. It is esti­mated that €65 bil­lion of deposits left Span­ish banks this past March alone.14 Peo­ple are tak­ing their money out of the Span­ish bank­ing sys­tem, and with­out the help of the gen­er­ous Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank (ECB), the Span­ish banks would likely be in a full col­lapse today (see Fig­ure 1).15 As it stands, the Span­ish banks have now bor­rowed a mas­sive €316.3 bil­lion from the ECB in order to meet the with­drawals and main­tain the illu­sion of solvency.

Per­haps it's Euro-crisis fatigue, or maybe just plain denial, but the equity mar­kets appear unwill­ing to acknowl­edge how close we are now to yet another round of Euro­zone upheaval. Spain's econ­omy is almost five times that of Greece. Spain also has over four times the amount of externally-held nom­i­nal debt out­stand­ing.16 If the bond vig­i­lantes choose to pun­ish the Span­ish 10-year bond (cur­rently trad­ing pre­car­i­ously close to a 6% yield), we could soon be back where we were this past Sep­tem­ber, only with a prob­lem four times as large.

The rest of Europe isn't look­ing so hot either. Italy's bond mar­ket is in a sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tion to that of Spain, with the Ital­ian 10-year bond trad­ing per­ilously close to the 6%-yield thresh­old. Recent data showed the Euro­pean Pur­chas­ing Man­agers Index (PMI) falling to 47.4 in March, well below the 50 mark which sig­nals growth in indus­trial activ­ity.17 Ger­man PMI recently con­firmed this move with its April release of 46.3, down from 48.4 in March, rep­re­sent­ing the fastest rate of con­trac­tion since July 2009.18 These declines in eco­nomic activ­ity, com­bined with the aus­ter­ity mea­sures most Euro coun­tries are cur­rently attempt­ing to impose, almost guar­an­tee more printed money will be pumped into the Euro­pean bond mar­kets before the year is over. It's sim­ply a mat­ter of time.

As expected, the pow­ers that be are busy parad­ing around in prepa­ra­tion for the next round of Euro­zone panic, with the IMF using the renewed con­cerns as an oppor­tu­nity to re-establish its rel­e­vance as a fire­wall provider. The IMF most recently secured $430 bil­lion worth of new "pledges" from var­i­ous G20 mem­ber coun­tries to increase its poten­tial lend­ing capac­ity to $700 bil­lion in the event of fur­ther prob­lems in the Euro­zone.19 Not unsur­pris­ingly, the BRICS coun­tries have expressed irri­ta­tion at the dis­pro­por­tion­ate vot­ing power held by West­ern pow­ers within the IMF at the expense of them­selves and the other devel­op­ing nations. In pre­pared remarks at an IMF press con­fer­ence, Brazil's finance min­is­ter crit­i­cized the skewed quo­tas that dic­tate vot­ing power, stat­ing that, "The cal­cu­lated quota share of Lux­em­bourg is larger than the one of Argentina or South Africa… The quota share of Bel­gium is larger than that of Indone­sia and roughly three times that of Nige­ria. And the quota of Spain, amaz­ing as it may seem, is larger than the sum total of the quo­tas of all 44 sub-Saharan African coun­tries."20 This unbal­ance used to make sense when the IMF was designed to help fund ail­ing third world and devel­op­ing coun­tries through eco­nomic cri­sis. But that is clearly no longer the IMF's main purpose.

It must be dif­fi­cult for the BRICS coun­tries today. On one hand, they con­tinue to jockey for respect among the West­ern pow­ers, insist­ing on par­tic­i­pat­ing in quasi-European bailout funds like the IMF. On the other hand, they are also clearly aware of the West­ern nations' con­tin­u­ing efforts to sur­rep­ti­tiously devalue their domes­tic cur­ren­cies, and the per­ni­cious effect that has had on them as exporters and as lenders of cap­i­tal. In that vein, it was inter­est­ing to note that dur­ing the lat­est BRICS Sum­mit held this past March in New Delhi, the main topic of dis­cus­sion cen­tered on the cre­ation of the group's first offi­cial insti­tu­tion, a so-called "BRICS Bank" that would fund devel­op­ment projects and infra­struc­ture in devel­op­ing nations. Although not openly dis­cussed, reports sug­gest what they were really talk­ing about was cre­at­ing a type of BRICS cen­tral bank — an insti­tu­tion that could facil­i­tate their abil­ity to "do more busi­ness with each other in their local cur­ren­cies, to help insu­late from U.S. dol­lar fluc­tu­a­tions…"21 Given the incred­i­ble scale of west­ern cen­tral bank inter­ven­tion over the past six months, the BRICS' increas­ing frus­tra­tion with their print­ing efforts should be a given by now. The real ques­tion is what they're doing about it, and what assets they're accu­mu­lat­ing to pro­tect them­selves from the inevitable, which brings us to gold.

Although the paper gold price has been range-bound over the past month, the phys­i­cal gold mar­ket has been under­go­ing stag­ger­ing change. Ear­lier this month it was revealed that Hong Kong gold imports into China totaled nearly 40 tonnes in the month of Feb­ru­ary, rep­re­sent­ing a 13-fold increase over the same month last year (see Fig­ure 2).22 40 tonnes annu­al­ized equates to 480 tonnes per year — a mas­sive num­ber in a mar­ket that only pro­duced 2,810 tonnes of mine sup­ply in 2011.23


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: economy; fundamentals; fundementals

1 posted on 04/29/2012 4:59:15 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Signalman

You know it is going to be bad when tax cheat Tim takes the position that the depression in Europe won’t impact on US companies. When companies like p&g are hurting, you know things aren’t going so well.


2 posted on 04/29/2012 5:36:29 PM PDT by jonose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I just tonight put all my stock holding on the market to sell tomorrow....

I think it going to get real ugly real quick....

I lost a bunch in the 2008 crash.... I am not losing a bunch in the coming crash....when Europe starts to unravel ....

Tomorrow I move my 401 K holdings into the bond market ...


3 posted on 04/29/2012 5:47:30 PM PDT by Popman (America is squandering its wealth on riotous living, war, and welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I have a webpage of unfudged economic numbers, most directly from the Federal Reserve. When you cut out the Gov doublespeak, things don’t look good.
http://www.futurnamics.com/slfed.php


4 posted on 04/29/2012 6:58:58 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Probably a good time to sell. Prices are artificially pumped up at the end of the month to raise valuations for managed funds and thusly, the management fees for the operators.


5 posted on 04/29/2012 8:04:21 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Click the link. The Republic you save may be your own.

6 posted on 04/29/2012 8:19:31 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson