Posted on 02/21/2012 8:29:25 AM PST by freedommom
CAMP ZAMA, Japan – The Army is ordering its hardened combat veterans to wear fake breasts and empathy bellies so they can better understand how pregnant soldiers feel during physical training.
This week, 14 noncommissioned officers at Camp Zama took turns wearing the “pregnancy simulators” as they stretched, twisted and exercised during a three-day class that teaches them to serve as fitness instructors for pregnant soldiers and new mothers.
Army enlisted leaders all over the world are being ordered to take the Pregnancy Postpartum Physical Training Exercise Leaders Course, or PPPT, according to U.S. Army Medical Activity Japan health promotion educator Jana York.
Developed by the Army in 2008, the course includes aerobics classes, pool sessions and classroom studies on the physiology of pregnant women. The NCOs learn special exercises for pregnant women, who shouldn’t push themselves too hard or participate in high-impact activities such as snowboarding, bungee jumping or horse riding, York said.
During the training, each NCO must wear the pregnancy simulator for at least an hour.
“When they first come in, the males are typically timid and don’t feel they have the knowledge to teach female soldiers,” she said. “However, after three days their confidence rises.”
Sgt. Michael Braden, a helicopter crew chief who has served in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kosovo, said he was less than enthusiastic about taking part.
“I didn’t want to do it,” said Braden, 29, of Everett, Wash. The 78th Aviation Battalion mechanic said he was ordered to do the training even though he doesn’t have any female soldiers in his unit and doesn’t see himself as the right sort of person to run the aerobics classes that make up a large portion of the PPPT training.
Despite his misgivings, Braden strapped on the empathy belly and spent Tuesday morning learning low-impact aerobics moves like the “grapevine” and the “V-step.”
“This whole thing is pretty uncomfortable,” he said of the 25-pound pregnancy simulator. But, “body armor is a lot heavier.”
Braden said he didn’t know there was such a thing as physical training for pregnant soldiers before he started the course.
“I’ve learned that being pregnant is no excuse to avoid PT,” he said.
According to an Army fact sheet about the program, “moderate exercise promotes a more rapid recovery from the birth process and a faster return to required physical fitness levels.”
An Army study showed significant Army physical fitness test failures, height/weight failures, and increased injury and illness rates when active-duty soldiers who don’t take part in physical exercise during pregnancy return to their unit, according to the fact sheet.
The program, which is mandatory for pregnant soldiers, was set up to get them back to their units quickly after they give birth, according to Staff Sgt. Latoya Nieves-Gonzales, who is helping York train the NCOs at Camp Zama.
“Pregnant soldiers were trying to do [regular Army] physical training and they couldn’t do a lot of the exercises,” she said.
Soldiers have six months to meet the Army’s height and weight standards and pass a physical training test after they give birth, she said, adding that nine pregnant soldiers do PPPT training at Camp Zama each morning.
“In the last year, we have only had one soldier who didn’t meet those standards and she was already in the weight-reduction program before she got pregnant,” she said.
Female soldiers typically add 25-30 pounds during a pregnancy, said Nieves-Gonzales, who put on 20 pounds before the birth of her own son, Xavier, six years ago in Würzburg, Germany.
That was before PPPT training was mandatory.
“My unit said: ‘You can’t do PT with us so just sleep in,’ ” she said.
Still, soldiers used to mounting up with rucksacks and rifles were not too keen on the idea of strapping on a big belly and fake breasts.
“I’m not looking forward to wearing the pregnancy simulator,” said Sgt. Matthew Prout, a 26-year-old member of the 88th Military Police Detachment at Camp Zama.
The Army Combatives instructor said he was worried that the frontal weight would throw his balance off during aerobics routines.
“It gives me a better sense of what the pregnant woman is going through as she is going the exercises,” he said. “It will allow me to see both sides.”
It never occurred to Prout, when he joined the Army, that he’d learn to train pregnant soldiers, he said.
I agree and would amend my original post to reflect that if I could. My position nis that women should not be in combat roles and should not be deployed on naval vessels.
And the beat goes on...
“She simply wasn’t raised to get by on her gender. You either make it like everyone else or you do something else.”
Shhhh! That kind of talk is heresy to the Democratic Party! ;)
So when are pregnant women going to be put on the front lines of battle? After all, their unborn children have a “right” to be in as much risk of danger as their mothers are./sarc
So true !!
The objective is to destroy morale. Humiliate the troops.
Make these footballs, guys.
Who knows. Maybe women will have to simulate strength and virility
KeyLargo: That pic made me LOL. You da man.
I wonder what the Stars and Stripes reporter is doing now after writing that article. The reporter and the editor are probably in some kind of encounter group focused on providing what is the real truth as opposed to what is reality. Up is down, down is up in the Obama military.
What planet are we on that we have pregnant women in the military — the very idea is outrageous and ridiculous
My refusal to take any course like that would be stated...
“Sir, I refuse to take this course because I would be violating provisions in the UCMJ Article 125; Sodomy...”
“Since the issue of removing that article in the uniformed code has not been addressed, I cannot, in good faith attend or participate in such instruction...Therefore, if I see anyone engaged in that activity, I will be forced to issue a report to have an investigation of those offence(s) and those engaged brought up on charges...”
(I vaguely recall it might be Article 125 in the UCMJ, I stand to be corrected...)
I would love to get the history on whose idea it was to implement this nonsense…
“So I know whose ass to kick...”
We are so f——d, its not even funny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.