Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

96 Responses to Do Latest Solar Studies Confirm Upcoming Global Cooling?
1 posted on 02/13/2012 11:43:54 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
1) We're all going to die
2) We need to de-industrialize the West
3) We need to invest in green technology
4) We need to raise taxes
2 posted on 02/13/2012 11:47:53 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I am pro-Jesus, anti-abortion, pro-limited government, anti-GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Al Gore on suicide watch.


3 posted on 02/13/2012 11:48:27 AM PST by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This won’t slow the global warming nuts one bit. They’ll try to raise taxes and institute “social justice” before the cooling begins, then claim victory.


5 posted on 02/13/2012 11:55:57 AM PST by youngidiot (Hear Hear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; landsbaum; Signalman; NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; Lancey Howard; ...

fyi


7 posted on 02/13/2012 11:59:32 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I hope so. I REALLY need some justification for that snowmobile. Especially as lame as this winter has been up here.


9 posted on 02/13/2012 12:30:27 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

In all seriousness, this is very reliable science. Solar minimums have preceded temperature reductions across the board. We likely won’t see a mini-ice-age like we did in the middle ages, as much of that was due to heavy volcanic activity in the 12th-14th centuries.

Industrialization cannot produce the sort of atmospheric “black out” that comes from normal geocentric processes. Man produces such a miniscule amount of “pollution,” that Earth’s natural scrubbers can do a fine job alone.

Matter of fact, I’ve seen some global cooling/ice age stuff on History/NatGeo lately that makes me wonder if the Liberals at those stations are going to preempt the coming “cold apocalypse.” It’s funny to watch them squirm. They can’t just chalk it up to nature doing what nature does.


10 posted on 02/13/2012 12:37:57 PM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Bump for later reading


13 posted on 02/13/2012 3:42:40 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

The Global Warming Hoax is Now Killing People

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

15 posted on 02/13/2012 7:21:09 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Many of you know that I have been writing, about exactly this type of mechanism to account for Earth’s temperature, on FR for the last decade or thereabouts. I have favored a somewhat shorter lag time, but have no quibbles with this proposed 9yr lag. The evidence is so clear that I honestly don’t understand how the IPCC-supporting alarmists are able to honestly maintain that CO2 is largely responsible for the 20th century warming. Crimeny: for the whole second half of the century, Sol was “the warmest it has been for the last 8000 years”, as Solanki and others published around a decade ago. The IPCC ignoring that rather pertinent fact in attempting explanations of temperature is massively delusional, and doing so because they don’t understand mechanisms as to how it could possibly affect temperatures so much is a poor excuse.

I have always believed that the poor immediate correlations were a function of ocean heat transport, which is clearly chaotic. However Svensmark’s cosmic ray mechanism, and Lndzen/Spencer’s tropical clouds mechanism (which may be linked) were welcome additions to the mix of theoretical possibilities for me. No matter what the actual reasons, it is more and more clear that changing CO2 levels account for only a small proportion of the temperature changes of Earth.


19 posted on 02/14/2012 5:30:29 AM PST by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson