If posted before, my apologies. Feasible? Interesting engine based on old Otto type engine.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: dynachrome
2 posted on
01/28/2012 3:51:40 PM PST by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: dynachrome
Looks pretty cool, but where do the exhaust gases go? Are they just released as the piston and cylinder come apart? If so, that would be a terribly dirty engine. Anyone have insight into that?
To: dynachrome
4 posted on
01/28/2012 4:03:07 PM PST by
brivette
To: dynachrome
Interesting concept. Hate to be using one in a vehicle if timing screws up. Would like to see some independent reviews from engineers
7 posted on
01/28/2012 4:08:59 PM PST by
Figment
To: dynachrome
9 posted on
01/28/2012 4:10:37 PM PST by
taildragger
(( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: dynachrome
The zenith of the internal combustion engine was reached in 1955 with the invention of the Small Block Chevy. It’s not just about efficiency, but also about ease of manufacture, cost, reliability and suitability for use in mass produced automobiles. Ultra high tech and fuel efficiency are not substitutes for all of those things. So what if a modern engine goes twice as far on a gallon of gas? It costs 10 times as much!
To: dynachrome
Build a working prototype and get back to me.
12 posted on
01/28/2012 4:11:50 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
To: dynachrome
14 posted on
01/28/2012 4:12:29 PM PST by
Jet Jaguar
(Romney=Gun Grabber.)
I think one of the great problems we have in the Republican Party is that we don't encourage you to be nasty. We encourage you to be neat, obedient, loyal and faithful and all those Boy Scout words, which would be great around a campfire but are lousy in politics.
Click The Pic To Donate
Support The Resistance
20 posted on
01/28/2012 4:23:38 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
To: dynachrome
Flying cars will now become possible.
To: dynachrome
.
Resembles the "Wankle Engine" ... circa 1970's ...
Wikipedia:
The Wankel engine is a type of internal combustion engine using an eccentric rotary design to convert pressure into a rotating motion instead of using reciprocating pistons. Its four-stroke cycle takes place in a space between the inside of an oval-like epitrochoid-shaped housing and a rotor that is similar in shape to a Reuleaux triangle but with sides that are somewhat flatter. The very compact Wankel engine delivers smooth high-rpm power. It is commonly called a rotary engine, though this name applies also to other completely different designs. It is the only internal combustion engine invented in the twentieth century to go into production.[1]
The engine was invented by German engineer Felix Wankel. He received his first patent for the engine in 1929, began development in the early 1950s at NSU, completing a working prototype in 1957.[1] NSU then licensed the concept to companies around the world, which have continued to improve the design.
Thanks to their compact design, Wankel rotary engines have been installed in a variety of vehicles and devices including automobiles, motorcycles, racers, aircraft, go-karts, jet skis, snowmobiles, chain saws, and auxiliary power units. Perhaps the greatest proponent of the Wankel engine has been the Japanese company Mazda.
.
23 posted on
01/28/2012 4:29:21 PM PST by
Patton@Bastogne
(Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
To: dynachrome
I am kind of following these guys, who are developing a new kind of steam engine. Don't know if it will succeed, but they seem to have some intrest in standing waste heat recovery applications.
Cyclone Power
To: dynachrome
Wait until the manufacturers of the Orgasmatron see the illustrated engine at work.
25 posted on
01/28/2012 4:31:33 PM PST by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
To: dynachrome
Can’t easily see the advantage of this design.
It still is a reciprocating engine for starters.
28 posted on
01/28/2012 4:38:11 PM PST by
Balding_Eagle
(Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
To: dynachrome
It looks very interesting but there looks to be so many critical wear points that maintaining alignment and fit might be nearly impossible for very long.
For example, what seals the piston inside the cylinders? That piston must have perfect alignment as it enters the cylinder and contend with side scuffing and maintaining inline position until it leaves the cylinder. What is a tiny bit of wear going to do to the fit?
29 posted on
01/28/2012 4:40:07 PM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: dynachrome
Very interesting and brilliant. Thanks for posting!
37 posted on
01/28/2012 5:08:24 PM PST by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: dynachrome
If you like unusual engine designs, check out the old Knight sleeve-valve motors.
41 posted on
01/28/2012 5:19:29 PM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: dynachrome
Many of the questions being asked here can be answered by viewing the images and description given at the site.
46 posted on
01/28/2012 6:34:36 PM PST by
Revel
To: dynachrome
That’s a Wanker engine Beavis. You have to crank it manually.
Heh heh heh uh heh heh
To: dynachrome
what if an engie like this was used to generate electricity to store in a battery in nd electric car.
You still feill it up on gas, but the tires are all driven by small electric engines
I am thinkit it would a nice lightweight vehicle
56 posted on
01/28/2012 7:40:10 PM PST by
Mr. K
(Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson