Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EDINVA; Kenny Bunk

My fear is that Malihi will accept a forged document without even giving it scrutiny, and the issue will be deemed as decided.

We’ve been betrayed by the judges too many times, so when somebody does what seems to be right it’s like the mischievous kid smiling; you wonder what he’s up to. Kenny, you suggested right away that it could be a ploy, and I followed up by saying it could specifically be intended to pre-empt whatever the Cold Case Posse comes up with.

I’ve said since about last January that I thought Abercrombie made his gung-ho statements about showing Obama’s BC because they were planning to unveil a forged one. And I said at that time that with the HDOH caught in so much law-breaking, alteration of records, lying, etc the only way we will have a trustworthy understanding of what really happened is to cross-examine all the records - computer transaction logs, etc. If this judge doesn’t demand that, and/or the microfilms as well as other records that very strongly look to be tampered with, Obama will be able to argue that his eligibility and the genuineness of the documents have already been legally proven.

Kenny, I think you said that Obama never claimed that what he posted online was his actual birth certificate. So if the HDOH comes out with a good forgery Obama could still evade forgery charges on a technicality. It is not legally certified even if the vestiges of a “seal” are considered, and I don’t believe for a minute that what he posted online is what the HDOH has in their office. They have in their office a much better forgery, and a judge looking at it for a brief moment could easily be fooled - especially if he doesn’t already know all the crap surrounding Sunahara’s birth record and other crimes the HDOH has committed surrounding Obama’s records.


21 posted on 01/15/2012 7:39:10 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion; Kenny Bunk
Kenny, I think you said that Obama never claimed that what he posted online was his actual birth certificate.

That may be correct, but it will get lost in the fact that his attorney took a contrary position in federal court.

In a footnote to his January 2, 2009 Motion to Dismiss the case brought by Gregory S. Hollister, Obama attorney Bauer informed the court that “President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing he was born...in HI.” Bauer referred the court to factcheck.org as concluding the certificate was genuine and urged the court to take judicial notice of the fact based on “these public records”.

It seemed ridiculous at the time that this information was deemed to have no evidentiary value, or to not support futher action by plaintiff.

See http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2008cv02254/134576/9/0.swf

67 posted on 01/16/2012 11:18:32 AM PST by frog in a pot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson