Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
What ever happens on Jan 26, don't be disheartened.

Back in 2008 we didn't know who he was and had no time to vet him.

All of that has changed. I had a conversation with coworkers last week and explained Obama was born a dual citizen. My youngest daughter was also born a dual citizen. She was born before my wife naturalized. She is entitled to have two passports, just like Obama was entitled to have two passports.

Yesterday my wife and I decided we will get her papers done and get the second passport. She has full legal rights in her mothers home country. She can own property there. She can inherit property there. She can go to college there.

Many people don't understand the the US allows dual citizenship. We tend to think its not allowed, but it is.

Conversations like this are going on all over America. We need to inform out friends. A born dual citizen is not a natural born citizen. My daughter is an American citizen by birth. But she is also a foreign citizen by birth. She is not a natural born citizen.

17 posted on 01/15/2012 6:37:47 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: PA-RIVER

I do think people are becoming more aware of dual citizenship and I think we’ll get some answers regarding NBC too.

Sometimes I feel like a broken record (I presume you’re old enough to still know about broken records. lol), but I can’t help but keep coming back to the lawlessness. If having a corrupt US AG means that any state in the union can become a sanctuary for criminals and nobody can ever bring the rule of law to that place because it’s off-limits to any other state’s law enforcement (even when it involves a crime committed in the state that wants to investigate), that is really, really scary to me.

The checks and balances are broken.

If Arizona would find that Obama perjured himself and committed forgery to get on their ballot and charged both Obama and various people from the HDOH (such as Fukino, Fuddy, Okubo, Onaka, etc) with aiding and abetting that crime (or of any of the other crimes they’ve committed), would the Hawaii government be able to just say, “You can’t have any evidence from our state if we don’t want you to”, and that would be the end of it? Can a state government commit crimes against other states and then hide their own evidence?

This whole process has been incredibly disillusioning to me, but this part of the hard-knocks education I’ve gotten is positively frightening - and especially now that I’m researching how Hitler was able to do what he did.

If Hawaii wanted to have their own Holocaust, at this point nobody could stop them as long as their own police and judges were willing to look the other direction. God knows Holder would look the other direction. Maybe even provide the gas chambers for them to do it - as long as it wasn’t Blacks who were gassed. He sure doesn’t seem to care about the Americans or Mexicans gunned down by guns he illegally provided the murderers (with no ability to even be tracked to the drug cartels until after the murders).

It doesn’t work to try to kid myself that something like that could never happen in America. It’s already happening with the eligibility issue; I’ve seen the whole system aiding and abetting crimes and nobody can do a dang thing about it. And we’ve got hardcore leftists as “czars”, who have said that they would put abortifacients or sterilants in the drinking water if they thought the earth needed less people on it. The goals of Hitler are totally in sync with the goals of Obama’s administration. The methods are totally in sync. And if nobody at the federal level can prosecute what Holder wants to overlook, and if nobody at the state level can get access to evidence if another state or the feds are willing to hide it... the rest of us are sitting ducks.

This is absolutely frightening to me. And sickening. It has to be fixed.


20 posted on 01/15/2012 7:22:59 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: PA-RIVER; butterdezillion
"A born dual citizen is not a natural born citizen. My daughter is an American citizen by birth. But she is also a foreign citizen by birth. She is not a natural born citizen."

I am in exactly the same situation. I explained this to my child as well, that although she may make a fine mayor, governor, senator or congressman one day, the presidency at current is not an office to which she can legally aspire. When you place that much power in the hands of a single individual, you don't want to have any issues with regard to where loyalties are presumed to lie.

The people that I run into in everyday life that I explain it to intuitively understand the reasoning, and yes, the amount of conversation on the subject is increasing. The description of NBC in Minor vs Happersett makes eloquently simple sense to most people. This issue is NOT going away. Not by along shot. The foregoing doesn't take into consideration that we won't even get to learn the findings of Arpaio's Cold Case Posse until next month.

25 posted on 01/15/2012 8:51:25 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome ("Obama" Eligibility: Don't let 'em (continue to) get away with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: PA-RIVER

It seems to me from what you say is that a duel citizenship person would have to have birth blood relationship if allowed by the two different nations. For example would my brother and I have dual citizenship by virtue of being born in the USA but our parents were immigrants not being citizens at the time of our birth if the nation of their citizenship did recognize duel citizenship?


48 posted on 01/15/2012 10:58:47 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson