Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Skeletons point to Columbus voyage for syphilis origins
Emory University ^ | December 20, 2011

Posted on 12/20/2011 1:17:42 PM PST by decimon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: SoCal Pubbie

mountainous Peruvian terrain didn’t lend itself to the use of wheeled carts
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ok, and what about the rest of the hemisphere?


41 posted on 12/20/2011 3:00:19 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Have there been any studies of syphilis on the bones of precolmbian Scottish shepherds


42 posted on 12/20/2011 4:16:04 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88; decimon
just remember you are having sex with everyone they also had sex with.

Now days, make that "every one, and every THING they ever had sex with.

Veggies, animals, shared "toys", inflatable dolls, Liberals....

43 posted on 12/20/2011 5:09:23 PM PST by ApplegateRanch ("Public service" does NOT mean servicing the people, like a bull among heifers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

“...why wasn’t the disease brought back by others? Chance? WSas it only the Columbus crew that had a sexual encounter with a disease bearer?”

The European predecessors to Columbus were so small in number....far north...and out of touch with mainland Europe (I’m thinking the Vikings under Leif Ericson...or St. Brendan before them) that they weren’t a factor. Columbus opened the door to all of mainstream Europe, through the major monarchs there, to interact with the Americas—unlike any that came before.

Given that the Icelanders (Leif Ericson) immediately established tiny colonies of families on Newfoundland...it’s possible too, with their wives there...that the men didn’t have sex with the Indian women...or if they did, the northern tribes didn’t have the STD’s of the Caribbean.

I don’t see why its such a touchy subject...STD’s are just a disease—and different diseases originate different places. The fact that new FLU strains almost always comes out of China today...doesn’t say the Chinese are any worse (or better) people than anyone else.

Differences in settlement patterns too. The Spanish and Portuguese, due to the perceived danger in the New World, refused to send women over (unlike the Vikings)...to establish regular colonies—this is why very (very) early Spanish and Portuguese mixed, sexually with the Indians—as they had no women with them.

Human nature...oh well.


44 posted on 12/20/2011 5:37:45 PM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

Within 10 years of Columbus too, there were many dozens (hundreds?) of other ships that came over...as he set off kind of an exploration race.

Hundreds of Spanish and Portuguese men—within a very short time—went to the Americas, and came back....with the disease. It wasn’t as if Columbus’ crew itself was responsible...rather the whole open door to a previously isolated world.

The Spanish too, sent whole armies over to explore and conquer (Conquistadors...), and for something like 30+ years NO WOMEN allowed by law. Hence virtually all...who could...had Indian mistresses, or just one night stands.

I heard one Latin American scholar estimate by the late 1500s upwards of 100,000 mestizos existed...considered lessors to the Europeans, and superior to the Indians. Caused ALL KINDS of social problems which continue to exist to this day.

A very different pattern in Latin and Central America than our English colonies later established in the North.


45 posted on 12/20/2011 6:18:21 PM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: decimon

They don’t know how it spreads?


46 posted on 12/20/2011 6:32:53 PM PST by ThanhPhero (Khach hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
The great thing about science is constantly being able to understand things in a new light.

Except, of course, for Anthropogenic Global Warming. That is Received dogma and cannot be altered by evidence or proof.

47 posted on 12/20/2011 6:39:46 PM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

About thirty years ago I remember reading about the remains of a mummified bear, 7000 years old, found in Missouri. This bear had syphyllis.

Such a disease can be a blood-borne infection. It is entirely possible for a disease to have originated with animals, spread by biting and scratching, and end up with humans infected through non-sexual means.

I’m suggesting it as a possibility.


48 posted on 12/20/2011 7:05:39 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Here were all these Chinese, sitting around in North America, enjoying a good bowl of moo goo gai pan when the Europeans came along. You think we bought Manhattan from the Chinese for twenty four bucks? Wait til you see what they charge us to buy our country back from them.


49 posted on 12/20/2011 7:21:29 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

There were SOME European women in the Americas quite early. IIRC some accompanied both Balboa and Cortez, and a fair number were among early settlers of Hispaniola and Cuba.


50 posted on 12/20/2011 7:48:34 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

There were SOME European women in the Americas quite early. IIRC some accompanied both Balboa and Cortez, and a fair number were among early settlers of Hispaniola and Cuba.


51 posted on 12/20/2011 7:52:15 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

I said I didn’t buy it! Another factor given is that there were few pack animals available, though South American tribes has llamas. A wheelbarrow type device or small cart still seems useful to even plains Indians. Who knows?


52 posted on 12/20/2011 7:52:15 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
There were not that many domesictable animals in the New World. Something wiped most of them out between ten to fifteen thousand years ago. What ever it was also wiped out most of the human population as well.

The wheel was developed but never put to any practical use as there were no beasts of burden to pull carts.

It was sort of in the same category as the Greek steam engine, there but not useful.

53 posted on 12/20/2011 9:20:41 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (*Philosophy lesson 117-22b: Anyone who demands to be respected is undeserving of it.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wordkraft

Link please?


54 posted on 12/20/2011 9:24:35 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (*Philosophy lesson 117-22b: Anyone who demands to be respected is undeserving of it.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

nonsense. All mammals are domesticable if you put in the time and effort with a breeding program. Hand carts are pulled by humans. No animals required.


55 posted on 12/20/2011 9:29:57 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
And hand cart appear long after animal pulled carts do. It's the way it works. Wheelbarrows didn't appear in Europe until 1000 AD.

As to all animals being capable of being domesticated... ok, be sure explain how to Sigfried and Roy.

56 posted on 12/20/2011 9:38:59 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (*Philosophy lesson 117-22b: Anyone who demands to be respected is undeserving of it.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
There were SOME European women in the Americas quite early.

It was still only SOME. This is very unlike the earliest settlers to the North...where women came in copious numbers--and, intermarriage with the Indians was, relative to Latin America, rare.

57 posted on 12/20/2011 9:41:18 PM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
I tednd to agree.

However, the article claims, "The evidence keeps accumulating that a progenitor of syphilis came from the New World with Columbus' crew and rapidly evolved into the venereal disease that remains with us today."

That's why I questioned as I did.

58 posted on 12/21/2011 5:18:15 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: decimon
This is from 1997....

Origins of Syphilis

59 posted on 12/21/2011 5:22:59 AM PST by mewzilla (Santelli 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon; SunkenCiv

“Hey white gods, wanna make boom boom with Doris the Diseased?” (heh,heh,heh)


60 posted on 12/21/2011 11:24:31 AM PST by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson