Posted on 12/06/2011 9:59:29 AM PST by bayouranger
On October 28, 2011, the jihadi forum Minbar Al-Tawhid Wal-Jihad published a fatwa by Sheikh Abu Humam Al-Athari, a member of its shari'a council, in which he unequivocally permits mujahideen to capture the infidels' women and have sexual intercourse with them, even those who are married, on the claim that their marriage bonds to infidels are dissolved as soon as they are taken captive.
Following are the fatwa's main points:
The inquiry in response to which Al-Athari issued the fatwa reads as follows:[1] "Is it permissible for mujahideen in jihad fronts to kidnap the infidels' women and hold them as their captives? What is the ruling regarding a captive in our times? How should they be divided [among the mujahideen]? Is it permissible to imprison [an infidel woman who has been taken captive] in an infidel land, or must she be brought to Dar Al-Islam [the abode of Islam]? How much time must one wait before having sexual intercourse with her, regarding both one who is a virgin and one who is not?"
Al-Athari replies: "There is no doubt that taking the women of the combatant infidels captive – whether they are from Ahl Al-Kitab [i.e., Christians or Jews] or pagans – is permitted according to the shari'a... That being said, it must be done only after [the spoils] has been divided by an imam in Dar Al-Islam; if there is no imam at hand, prisoners may not be taken..."
Al-Athari emphasizes that before deciding to take infidel women captive, "one must consider the gains and losses that will result from this deed, which is to say that if the imam of the Muslims in a given country believes that taking the infidels' women captive will lead the infidels to band together and rape the Muslims' women, and that the Muslims are in too weak a state to prevent this, he should forbid taking [infidel women] captive..."
Al-Athari notes that "there are too many proofs of the permissibility of taking the infidels' women captive to enumerate here, but we can divide them into two categories: 'general proofs' and 'concrete proofs.'" He explains that the "general proofs" are those which clarify that it is forbidden to violate the honor of Muslim women, but that this does not hold true regarding the infidel women, except in cases where they are assured protection. Al-Athari claims that the permissibility is absolute and anchored in the principles of the shari'a. Therefore, he says, it does not necessitate proof, and it falls rather on those who forbid taking infidel women captive to prove the legitimacy their claims.
In his discussion of "concrete proofs," Al-Athari quotes Al-Qurtubi, who says: "Most scholars, including Malik [ibn Anas], Al-Shafi'i, Abu Hanifa,[2] and others, thought that taking [infidel women] captive removes the protection [they previously enjoyed], and permits whoever is holding them to have sexual intercourse with them." Al-Athari also quotes another scholar whose interpretation of Al-Qurtubi's ruling says that the latter uses the word "protection" to refer to married women, who are forbidden to men other than their husbands. That is, when these women are taken captive, their marriage contracts with their infidel husbands become void, and they become permissible to their captors. Al-Athari adds that the amount of time a captor must wait until having sexual intercourse with a captive infidel woman depends on her condition: if she is pregnant, he must wait until after she gives birth; if she is menstruating, he must wait until after her period is over; and if she is young and has not yet begun menstruating, he must wait a month from her capture.
It certainly would not.
>>>and if she is young and has not yet begun menstruating, he must wait a month from her capture.<<<<
Far beyond disgusting.
Where is that knuckledragger located?
Islam must be eradicated from the fabric of humanity
Bullet, meet back of head.
It’s the only thing Muslims understand.
And make sure that islam receives protection under the First Amendment that other religions enjoy.
It didn’t touch on dowry but the rest is accurate.
Thank you.
Will Hillary Clinton be inviting him to Washington to extend an olive branch?
I would ask the royal koranimals in saudia arabia. They fund all of these subhuman filth masquerading around as pious people.
Hell, HRC probably wrote that fatwa while dressed in drag.
Fatwa Permits Mujahideen to Kidnap, Imprison, and Rape Infidel Women,
[Thanks Candor7.]
. . . . Check out article, then see another article at Link, below:
These five pages from Carroll Quigley's "Tragedy and Hope" offer the best explanation of the sick, twisted and ultimately psychotic outlook that comprise what he characterized as the Pakistani-Peruvian axis. - It's a jaw-dropper.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2807571/posts
.
“”except moderate mooselimbs, both of them, when identified, will be spared. “”
That is funny - we need all the laughs we can get.
“”if the imam of the Muslims in a given country believes that taking the infidels’ women captive will lead the infidels to band together and rape the Muslims’ women,””
Apparently he thinks that’s the reason other countries go to war!! What a creep! What country does he live in and who the heck is he? There just aren’t enough words to describe the ignorance of these people.
spoils of war
old, old story
still true, Infidels. Was then. Is now.
Eternal islam. Nothing has changed, except Western naivete.
“Islam is not a religon. It is a political system that was set up to enable and justify the sexual perversions of a madman.”
As well as justifying murder, robbery, mass rape, conquest, looting, and enslavement for fun and profit.
Yeah, it's funny but what is sad is that it is almost true. The idea of islam is that it is a political movement that uses religion as a shield.
It is the only major "religion" that promulgates the murder of "infidels" as an accepted method to promote its own influence.
It should be banned in America as it's goal is the eventual overthrow of our gummint, all people become mooselimbs, and sharia become the law as it does in every country where the mooselimbs are strong enough.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.