Posted on 11/26/2011 6:15:16 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson
BJK repeating in #19: "Answer: Evidence suggesting that others in Hawaii and/or Washington knew or suspected is, ahem, er... disputed, not least by Free Republic's own CougarGA7..."
CougarGA7: "Funny. You didn’t answer my question."
Of course I did, you just don't like the answer any better the second time I stated it.
But, if you are looking for some specific examples, you'd need only review any of your own past posts on this particular subject.
Here, I'll tell you how to do it: go to the listing of all of CougarGA7's past posts, then word-search Stinnett, Victor or Toland, for starters.
Those should provide all the examples you could want, of what I'm "trying to infer".
No, you didn’t. I asked you a question and you responded by trying to define a verb in your sentence.
Try again.
False. Your question is nearly meaningless, but my answer is to the point: if you wish to know specifically what I'm talking about, then simply do a word-search in your own posts for "Stinnett", "Victor" or "Toland."
Your words on that subject are what I'm talking about.
So, why is this even debatable?
What exactly is your problem, FRiend.
Missed again. See what I’m saying. You’re just not very good at this.
Let me spell this out in more simplistic terms for you so perhaps you can wrap your head around it.
You are stating that I am disputing “evidence suggesting that others in Hawaii and/or Washington knew”. I asked you what you trying to infer that I was saying. But this sentence was too complex for you so I’ll break it down into easier pieces for you.
Some remedial English for you here since you appear to need it. “What” in this case is being used as a determiner which means the response should be based on a subject or noun. You responded by trying to define the verb in your sentence showing a clear lack of general comprehension.
What you should have been able to figure out from my statement, but failed miserably at (again) is that I’m asking “What evidence are you claiming I am disputing?” Or even simpler if you need it to be “Knew what?” I want you to be specific about this or not mention me at all when you make these generalizations.
See the problem is, you have often in the past made claims that I’ve said things that I have not and I will not allow you to misrepresent my statements or positions, so if you try and make a claim that I have a said something you had better be prepared to back it up. I would have thought you would have been able to figure this out by now since I call you on it every time if nothing else for the change to show others your utter ignorance.
Now I have reread what I just wrote and asked myself this question, “Would someone with a brain injury be able to understand what I have wrote?” I believe so, so if you can’t wrap you head around this now, I’m afraid there’s not much I can do for you.
This is not difficult, brain child.
I am not "claiming" anything.
I am pointing to your own posts, relevant sections to be found by doing word searches on names like Stinnett, Victor and Toland.
Those are your comments that I'm talking about.
Now, you're a big boy, and they are your own posts, so you can look them up, all by your own-self, right?
Very amusing. You have been outclassed by people with brain injuries. I can’t say that I’m surprised. I already know what I said. You are the one who made a claim that I’m disputing something without specifying what exactly it is. Honestly, you wouldn’t even be worth the time of day if it wasn’t for the fact that your ignorance makes great comedy.
Your consistent response of resorting to insults when you have no arguments to present is well noted.
Comedy?
Whatever makes you feel better. I’m just pointing out to you what is obvious to everyone else.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.