Skip to comments.
Quantum theorem shakes foundations
Nature ^
| 17 November 2011
| Eugenie Samuel Reich
Posted on 11/18/2011 5:52:08 AM PST by ShadowAce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
1
posted on
11/18/2011 5:52:10 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
2
posted on
11/18/2011 5:53:01 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
3
posted on
11/18/2011 5:58:45 AM PST
by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
To: ShadowAce
Does that mean now is now 5,000 light years away?
To: JRios1968
IIRC..Einstein died NOT believing in qunatum theory..
5
posted on
11/18/2011 6:05:55 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ShadowAce
".....a theorem showing that if a quantum wavefunction were purely a statistical tool, then even quantum states that are unconnected across space and time would be able to communicate with each other. As that seems very unlikely to be true, the researchers conclude that the wavefunction must be physically real after all." Can someone shed some light on the implications of this?
6
posted on
11/18/2011 6:11:19 AM PST
by
cerberus
To: Fester Chugabrew
Does that mean now is now 5,000 light years away? 
Now...
7
posted on
11/18/2011 6:13:24 AM PST
by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
To: ShadowAce
Speaking of wave function. When I was little, my blue-sky question was always, why do waves go up and down? Later I wondered the same thing about more subtle kinds of waves.
I’m still wondering. Light can travel in waves. Energy too. Why? Why up and down? This way and that way. Whatever makes it go either way, why does it let it go instead of just pulling it one way?
What’s with the tennis match?
To: ShadowAce
A philosopher of physics. What does that tell us?
9
posted on
11/18/2011 6:25:32 AM PST
by
Williams
(Honey Badger Don't Care)
To: ShadowAce
I'm going to go out on a limb here. Or, maybe a twig.....
If conciseness affects matter (the jinx in the machine), and thoughts are energy (human energy field), wouldn't the energy emitted from thoughts backed by strong emotion affect things at a distance as well?
Wouldn't that energy attract and communicate with like energy instantly, and explain miracles (with the results based on the intensity and spirit of energy transmitted)?
If thought energy can affect things at a distance, wouldn't that validate the use of prayer?
To: ShadowAce
xkcd's take on the wave/particle duality.
11
posted on
11/18/2011 6:33:01 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Herman Cain: possibly the escapee most dangerous to the Democrats since Frederick Douglass.)
To: Williams
>
A philosopher of physics. What does that tell us? I think it probably refers to "PhD in Physics", since PhD is "Doctor of Philosophy".
12
posted on
11/18/2011 6:41:20 AM PST
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: ShadowAce
To: ShadowAce
Quantum theory/physics is the most fascinating thing. Maybe I should have majored in this instead of computer science.


If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.Or you can get raw with these strings. Either way, the violin is sweet yet lethal.
Do it!
14
posted on
11/18/2011 6:52:10 AM PST
by
rdb3
(The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart.)
To: concerned about politics
(human energy field)
I don't think a "human energy field" has, as of yet, been shoe horned into the Standard Model of Physics.
The benefit of prayer is a different matter.
15
posted on
11/18/2011 6:59:00 AM PST
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
To: rdb3
Quantum theory/physics is the most fascinating thing. Maybe I should have majored in this instead of computer science.I agree. I'd love to dig a lot deeper into this. Right now, all I do is read a LOT of books on the subject. In fact, sometimes I have to read the same book twice to "get it."
When it comes to the scientific jargon that's needed to explain what I've learned - I really suck at it. That makes consolidating the right words to hold up my end of a conversation difficult.
To: ShadowAce
Cowabunga, baby! Ride the wave!
17
posted on
11/18/2011 7:06:40 AM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: concerned about politics
If thought energy can affect things at a distance, wouldn't that validate the use of prayer?Yes!


If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.Or you can get raw with these strings. Either way, the violin is sweet yet lethal.
Do it!
18
posted on
11/18/2011 7:10:28 AM PST
by
rdb3
(The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart.)
To: Lady Lucky
I clearly do not know why, but your question is very intriguing...
19
posted on
11/18/2011 7:11:46 AM PST
by
jrestrepo
(See you all in Galt's gulch)
To: ZX12R
I don't think a "human energy field" has, as of yet, been shoe horned into the Standard Model of Physics.It should be. Energy never dies, for one. Where does it go, especially since it's conscience of itself, after the body dies!
Secondly, if nothing exists until it's observed, that energy field has to be in play and in the body, or there is no observer, and therefore nothing observed.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson