Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anyone know what Breitbart's up to? An hour ago he tweeted:
Tweet | 11/13/11 | winston's julia

Posted on 11/13/2011 4:35:35 PM PST by Winstons Julia

In next few hours I will be calling for prominent, powerful congressperson to step down. Do pay attention, @MMFA, @EricBoehlert!


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: andrewbreitbart; andybreitbart; bachus; congress; establishment; gop; liberals; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-168 next last
To: null and void

He’s GAY?

I knew that “all caps” stuff was a little whacky.

Freakin’ perv....


81 posted on 11/13/2011 5:11:27 PM PST by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

Where’s @MMFA & hapless @EricBoehlert to defend @BachusAL06? Almost feel sad MC Spencer B doesn’t have Soros-funded operation to defend him.


82 posted on 11/13/2011 5:11:52 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Did you look at #68?

Rep. Bachus lashed out against Palin and the Tea Party on November 4th while speaking to the South Shelby (Ala.) Chamber of Commerce. “The Senate would be Republican today except for states (in which Gov. Palin endorsed candidates) like Christine O’Donnell in Delaware,” Bachus said. “Sarah Palin cost us control of the Senate.” He went on to say that Tea Party candidates did well in U.S. House races, but in the U.S. Senate races, “they didn’t do well at all.” Bachus is mistaken in his attempts to place blame. In fact, it is the very policies he champions that cost the GOP its chance to win control of the Senate.


83 posted on 11/13/2011 5:12:13 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I wish.


84 posted on 11/13/2011 5:13:15 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (WE ARE AMERICA! DONATE TO FR MORE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Please let it be Sheila Jackson Lee - She is a pox on the House of Texas and makes Ron Paul look sane.


85 posted on 11/13/2011 5:13:33 PM PST by corbe (mystified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

“I wouldn’t pay attention to Twitter or Breitbart.”

Oh Geez!! Guys like you make me puke. I guess you’re the only one that’s sufficiently puritan to be “conservative”. Breitbart has done more for our cause than you would do in ten lifetimes.

By the way if you had a “fag” son, what would you do with him?


86 posted on 11/13/2011 5:14:13 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

http://www.breitbart.tv/breitbart-calls-for-spencer-baucus-to-resign-from-congress/


87 posted on 11/13/2011 5:15:30 PM PST by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

I do not know about Bacchus’ political strategy IQ - sounds like he has a pretty low one. My knowledge of Bacchus is on economic issues from watching him debate liberals on CNBC and in that context, he’s very good. Too bad he’s a crook and out of touch with the tea party.


88 posted on 11/13/2011 5:16:14 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
If you are unaware of events, it would serve you poorly for me to hand you the facts.

Sounds like a wacky code meaning you made up the allegation and I am supposed to prove Santa Claus doesn't exist.

When tossing turds, a responsible man will reveal the source of the scat.

89 posted on 11/13/2011 5:16:55 PM PST by NautiNurse (Zot! Cut! Slash! --That's the sound of the men workin' on the Cain gang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: adorno

It appears they were going after Nancy and they got the word to back off. So they had to throw a bunch of republicans in the mix so as to appear non partisan. Turns out it just showed how partisan they really are.


90 posted on 11/13/2011 5:22:01 PM PST by Terry Mross (Where is the OPPOSITION party? I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

Oh! Yah! Remember Dan Rostenkowski?


91 posted on 11/13/2011 5:22:45 PM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Only if this rises to the criminal level does it matter, i.e., insider trading.

If not, it’s “house ethics”, blah, blah.

Corporate media machine is trying to stay relevant.

If there’s no criminal prosecution it’s pure entertainment.


92 posted on 11/13/2011 5:24:10 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike; 2ndDivisionVet

And here’s what Breitbart threatened in August. Can’t wait to see what Bannon’s reveal will be now!


93 posted on 11/13/2011 5:25:15 PM PST by rintense (ABO is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

Im fb friends with and he’s been pretty quiet. We’ve chatted on occasion. This could get interesting..


94 posted on 11/13/2011 5:25:17 PM PST by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Bump


95 posted on 11/13/2011 5:27:45 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Or maybe you should just pay more attention.

Pick a scenario.


96 posted on 11/13/2011 5:28:31 PM PST by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

To: gov_bean_ counter

Yeah, Breitbart needs to throw Dodd and Frank in the mix too.


98 posted on 11/13/2011 5:28:53 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
Breitbart has done more for our cause than you would do in ten lifetimes.

If your cause is faggotry then I'd agree.

99 posted on 11/13/2011 5:30:04 PM PST by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

I think he means Debbie WS..but could apply to Debbie Stabintheface or Maxine Butt Ugly Waters too.
Whose Jane Harmon?


100 posted on 11/13/2011 5:31:30 PM PST by Mountain Mary (Awaken Oh America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson