Just click to donate
And you don't lose any skin or children in the process!
Posted on 11/03/2011 9:47:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The X-Men movie series, based on the comic books of the same name, is well-known for its unusual cast of gifted mutants and for its extraordinary special effects. What is not as widely known about the X-Men is the fact that the movies, along with the comic books, draw many clear parallels between the mutants and the gay and lesbian community. It is an open secret that the most recent movie in the series, “X-Men First Class,” which serves as the prequel for the other films, is especially overt in presenting these parallels.
Zach Stenz, one of the First Class screenwriters, explained on a Facebook comment posted in June: “I helped write the movie, and can tell you the gay rights / post-holocaust Jewish-identity / civil rights allegory stuff was put in there on purpose. Joss Wheldon designed the whole ‘Cure’s storyline in the comic books specifically as a gay allegory, and Bryan Singer wove his own feelings of outsiderdom as a gay man into the movie series. The whole ‘Have you ever tried NOT being a mutant’ coming out scene in X2 [released in 2003] is even particularly subtle, while it is effective.”
Who exactly is Bryan Singer? He is the openly gay producer, director, and/or writer of X-Men, X2, and X-Men First Class, and a reviewer on the Fridae website (“Empowering Gay Asia”) noted that Singer stated in an interview on BBC “that ‘mutant’ was a stand-in for ‘gay.’” Those are the words of Singer, not my own.
The reviewer, named Helmi, explained , “X-Men is supposed to be the superhero series that secretly took gay issues into massive mainstream territory. Since the comic appeared in the 60s, pop-culture critics have drawn parallels between the mutants’ struggle to gain wider acceptance for being genetically ‘different,’ and the gay community's struggle for acceptance and recognition.”
Singer cast some famously gay actors in key roles, most notably Sir Ian McKellen, who said at the Cannes Film Festival shortly before the release of X-Men 3: “As a gay man, some people think that it ought to be cured and made normal again, and I find it as offensive as someone saying that they have a cure for the color of their skin. This particular story was close to my heart; it has an important message to young people who may for one reason or another be disaffected with society because society points at their differences and says that they're inferior to the rest of us.”
Writing in 2006 in RelevantMagazine.com about “X-Men: The Last Stand,” ex-gay author Chad Thompson noted, “I saw the movie and discovered that almost every scene in it somehow parallels the struggle to integrate gay and lesbian people into society.”
He was not exaggerating when he said, “almost every scene.” Another viewer of X-Men 3 commented to me, “As I watched the film, the connections and similarities were startling. You could have made the X-Men gay and the script would have worked perfectly.”
Thompson explains, “In a world where some are born ‘normal’ and others are born with genetic mutations that give them superpowers, those without the mutations decide to formulate a serum that can normalize the mutants. Most of the mutants argue that they don’t need a cure, asserting that their mutations are innate to their identities, but still some who aren’t happy with their mutations embrace the chance to change.”
In X-Men: First Class, Dr. Henry "Hank" McCoy concocts a serum that will hide his mutation (seen in his feet) without removing his powers, only to discover that the serum actually accelerates his mutation, turning him into a powerful beast. In other words, therapy designed to turn a homosexual into a heterosexual will not work. Instead, it will result in a stronger homosexual identity.
In light of the whole theme of X-Men: The Last Stand, this message is certainly intended.
In perhaps the movie’s most obvious example of “mutant as a stand-in for gay,” when Hank McCoy is first revealed to be a mutant, he is questioned by his coworkers as to why he hadn’t reveal his true identity before. He replies, “You didn’t ask, I didn’t tell.” Gays in the military under Don’t Ask Don’t Tell couldn’t have said it better.
Alyssa Rosenberg, writing on the ThinkProgress.org website, called X-Men First Class “a great gay rights metaphor,” noting that already in X2, “Iceman’s visit to his parents took the form of a coming-out sequence, complete with confusion and rejection by a sibling. In First Class, those comparisons are even more explicit.”
Explicit is hardly an overstatement, as the mutants proclaim themselves to be out and proud towards the end of the flick. It appears that subtlety is no longer needed.
But this should come as no surprise. After all, Elizabeth Taylor famously said, “If it weren’t for gays, honey, there wouldn’t be a Hollywood.”
Bryan Singer = ‘Superman Returns’. Case closed.
In the Singer movies because he’s gay, yes. In the stuff without Singer not so much but sort of, in the Chris Claremont years especially mutants represented pretty much every group that’s ever been shat upon, which includes gays, and Jews, and blacks. They were a general diatribe against all bigotry. Singer has just kind of focused it.
Another franchise bites the dust...
Absolutely, the code has been broken...homosexuals are the real mutants
Well, lucky me. I’ve never seen any of the X-Men movies nor did I read the comic books as a kid. There is plenty of other dreck that I wish I had avoided over the decades, as well.
Duh
Of course it is. I’m always surprised when people don’t pick up on that. Though, I did grow up in New York City and knew a lot of gay people growing up, so maybe I’m more aware of such things than some.
When I first saw the movie, I figured “Oh, Bryan Singer is gay and has a thing for old British guys. I had no idea.”
You know what? The first couple movies are still pretty damn good. At least Singer didn’t make the horrible Batman movie that was all about the codpieces like Joel Schumacher did. Okay, he came close with Superman Returns, but X-Men is still pretty good.
In the comics, I always related the X-Men to gun owners.
The gov’t was always trying to “register” them and eventually created robots to round-them-up.
The language used with regard to superpowers is the same used for firearms -— can we trust them with that ability?
I never saw the connection to homosexuality because I do not think that way.
The homo’s I work with picked up on the gay motif of X-Men IMMEDIATELY although I never believed them.
Homo’s will tell you who is gay or if a movie/tv show has a hidden gay theme within 5 minutes of observation.
It’s called ‘gaydar’ for a reason.
In the grander symbolic narrative they’re both 3 dollar bills with pink hair.
Mutant: Noun. of, relating to, or produced by mutation
Mutation: Noun, a significant and basic alteration : change
Gays are also known as Fascists In Leotards!
I never liked the X Men movies and this comes from a big fan of the MU. I ALSO NEVER liked Bryan Singer’s interpretation of the X Men universe and now I have another reason to not like it. This movie franchise really needs to die so it can be rebooted properly in a couple of years by Marvel Studios, the same goes for Spiderman.
Gay mutant? Your mutant power isn’t something cool like metal claws or laser eyes...it’s the ability to match carpets and drapes flawlessly...even plaids...
Stan Lee, the Jewish creator of Marvel, including the X-men, has stated repeatedly that the mutants were a parable of the Jewish experience, and grew out of his reaction to the Shoa.
Xavier represents Stan’s “good side”
Magento (who is actually a Camp survivor in the stories”) Stan’s bad side.
Me, I would listen to the author regarding what he meant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.