Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gone in 60 nanoseconds - ( Faster than light possible? )
WaPo ^ | October 6, 2011 | Charles Krauthammer

Posted on 10/07/2011 8:47:49 AM PDT by re_tail20

“We don’t allow faster-than-light neutrinos in here,” says the bartender.

A neutrino walks into a bar.

— Joke circulating on the Internet

The world as we know it is on the brink of disintegration, on the verge of dissolution. No, I’m not talking about the collapse of the euro, of international finance, of the Western economies, of the democratic future, of the unipolar moment, of the American dream, of French banks, of Greece as a going concern, of Europe as an idea, of Pax Americana — the sinews of a postwar world that feels today to be unraveling.

I am talking about something far more important. Which is why it made only the back pages of your newspaper, if it made it at all. Scientists at CERN, the European high-energy physics consortium, have announced the discovery of a particle that can travel faster than light.

Neutrinos fired 454 miles from a supercollider outside Geneva to an underground laboratory in Gran Sasso, Italy, took less time (60 nanoseconds less) than light to get there. Or so the physicists think. Or so they measured. Or so they have concluded after checking for every possible artifact and experimental error.

The implications of such a discovery are so mind-boggling, however, that these same scientists immediately requested that other labs around the world try to replicate the experiment. Something must have been wrong — some faulty measurement, some overlooked contaminant — to account for a result that, if we know anything about the universe, is impossible.

And that’s the problem. It has to be impossible because, if not, if that did happen on this Orient Express hurtling between Switzerland and Italy, then everything we know about the universe is wrong.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: krauthammer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 10/07/2011 8:47:52 AM PDT by re_tail20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
everything we know about the universe is wrong

Painting with a pretty broad brush. Everything THEY know...

2 posted on 10/07/2011 8:52:08 AM PDT by bigheadfred (But alas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
...these same scientists immediately requested that other labs around the world try to replicate the experiment.

The way science used to work, the global warming guys should try this method.

3 posted on 10/07/2011 8:53:08 AM PDT by Slicksadick (Go out on a limb........Its where the fruit is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
The implications of such a discovery are so mind-boggling, however, that these same scientists immediately requested that other labs around the world try to replicate the experiment.

Everyone knows that real scientists (like climatologists) bury the raw data, claim that their results are undeniable and set up the stake for a heretic burning for anyone who denies their claims.

A 60 nanosecond difference over 454 miles would be 0.0025% faster than the speed of light. There's lots of room for experimental error of that scale.

4 posted on 10/07/2011 8:59:18 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Compare "Delay is preferable to error" - Thomas Jefferson // "Pass this bill now!" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
Everything we know about the universe is wrong.

Nope. I know that my Redeemer liveth.

5 posted on 10/07/2011 9:00:13 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (Fall on your knees before Christ, your only salvation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
Was that faster than twitter?

And I thought that the science was settled?

6 posted on 10/07/2011 9:01:18 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20

Come one people...according to the leftist godless scientists like Lawrence Krauss the universe was created from a random quantum fluctuation and it happened without a “god”. End of story./sarc


7 posted on 10/07/2011 9:03:12 AM PDT by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20

“then everything we know about the universe is wrong”

Even if faster than light travel is possible, this isn’t true. It’s hyperbole. Was everything we knew about the universe wrong when Newton was proved wrong? No. We still follow him, in the limited shpere where he applies (i.e. inbetween atoms and planets), like we’ve done since the 17th century. We’ve stuck with Einstein despite his system being overturned by quantum physics, which some people date to five years before his development of the Special Theory of Relativity.

We will stick with nearly everything we know, if this is true, except that which is directly affected by the possibility of faster than light travel.


8 posted on 10/07/2011 9:04:22 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
Story on /. says that what was not taken into account was gravity and its distortion of time.

"Two weeks ago, researchers claimed particles called neutrinos were travelling faster-than-light and violating the laws of special relativity. But now it looks as though general relativity might be behind the experiment's unusual result. An independent analysis claims that the original experiment, known as OPERA, failed to take into account differences in earth's gravitational field between the neutrino source and the OPERA detector. As Nature News reports, gravity can distort time according to Einstein's theory, and the effect could explain why neutrinos appear to arrive 60 nanoseconds ahead of schedule. The OPERA team is now reviewing the new analysis."

9 posted on 10/07/2011 9:05:20 AM PDT by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
When I read stories like this, I'm always reminded of this quote....

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts" - Richard Feynmen

10 posted on 10/07/2011 9:09:04 AM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20

The speed of light is inviolable. The science is settled. Deniers.


11 posted on 10/07/2011 9:10:50 AM PDT by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20
Maybe the receiving site was moving towards the sending site (e.g. the Earth's rotation) in terms of a fixed point in the Universe. The neutrinos, which are notoriously indifferent to the medium they are passing through, would therefore have less distance to travel and everything would be alright.
12 posted on 10/07/2011 9:26:26 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
A 60 nanosecond difference over 454 miles

Measuring 60 nsec differences on oscilloscopes is routine.

13 posted on 10/07/2011 9:32:29 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20

There is pretty good theory/mathematics now that show FTL is possible.

The only limitation being that you cannot travel AT the speed of light.

How that works with the Lorentz transformations, I am not sure.

Beyond Einstein’s Unified Field:
Gravity and Electromagnetism Redefined
John Brandenburg, Ph.D.


14 posted on 10/07/2011 9:35:29 AM PDT by djf (Soon you will need a prescription for EVERY SINGLE VITAMIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
Measuring 60 nsec differences on oscilloscopes is routine.

Even when you are on the 500µs/division setting to get the entire 2.44ms travel time on the screen at once?

15 posted on 10/07/2011 9:39:01 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Compare "Delay is preferable to error" - Thomas Jefferson // "Pass this bill now!" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
We will stick with nearly everything we know, if this is true, except that which is directly affected by the possibility of faster than light travel.

cosmology will be affected hugely. distances are measured/calculated assuming light speed is constant. And E=Mc^2 needs to be rethought/modified.

16 posted on 10/07/2011 9:42:10 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lormand
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts" - Richard Feynmen

read my tag line.

17 posted on 10/07/2011 9:44:15 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Even when you are on the 500µs/division setting to get the entire 2.44ms travel time on the screen at once?

you need a special scope, or maybe a precise delay filter.

18 posted on 10/07/2011 9:52:00 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20

“Man will never break the sound barrier....it’s impossible”


19 posted on 10/07/2011 9:55:08 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
"“Man will never break the sound barrier....it’s impossible”"

Bad comparison. First, whoever originally said that was an idiot. It was never impossible, it was just hard. Second, the sound barrier was only ever a technological issue, not an issue involving the fundamental character of the universe.

20 posted on 10/07/2011 10:07:02 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson