Posted on 09/07/2011 8:10:05 PM PDT by Hillary's Folly
This site is broken when people like me are blocked for stating the obvious. What is the obvious? ask me privately because the "free" "republic" will keep us from discussin it in the "forum"
The Moderator stated that it had nothing to do with the what you said, but the fact that it lacked sufficient content to be of any value to the site.
Get over it, take his advice and try again.
It happens on every forum on the internet.
I too am a moderator and have to do the same thing as part of my job as a mod ... every day.
Oops. Never mind, lol.
Now you have two worthless one line vanities going.
What do you have on your mind?
Illiterate, inarticulate, congratulations, you’re overly qualified for the Dancing With the Stars Show, AS WELL as the Americans Idle.
If the OP's thread is the one I remember, it was a one line vanity that was posted while there was still a very active debate thread ongoing.
That kind of thing has always been against board rules. We don't want 200 vanity threads clogging up the board.
If he had posted the exact same comments in the debate thread, it never would have been deleted. Others were on there saying the exact same thing.
I think he just needed some attention
I'm sure I didn't say anything like that. After all, the only way you get to be a RINO is to have been elected to office under another party's label, then jump ship to run as a REPUBLICAN ~ usually because the big dogs in the Democrat party decided it wasn't your turn to move up yet.
We broke the back of the Democrats in the formerly "Solid South" just that way.
Some people looking far into the future decided to change the meaning of RINO beginning in a Freeper Thread on 9/25/2001.
I guess they saw that some current Democrats might like to avoid the fate of being declared to be RINOs around FR, so they started early to clear the decks.
In that one thread the term is used BOTH WAYS. Before that time RINO was used only to refer to ship jumping Democrats.
Obviously I'd never misuse the term.
So, did you complain about it? Get mad; voice your displeasure; make a threat; raise caine; let me know of your distress? Whatever, you should have.
BTW, you are not allowed to criticize Sarah even if you do work for Christine ~ not while I'm around, but I'm sure your criticism was not meant in a heartfelt way so I simply missed it.
We had some trouble with the anti-Christine folks ~ they liked Br'r Castle I gather. Frankly, Castle was a p~~~z
Sorry about that.... : (
Well played...
Disgruntled Ronulan perhaps?
Ahhh. 85 replies to a nonsense thread when my real policy based thread was deleted. Thank you FREE REPUBLIC
I believe you got your original thread back...
- Now you have two worthless one line vanities going.
Why weren’t you in the debates, Jim? lol
Not many could beat Helen but this comes close!
I think Newt and Mitt did well, But Perry was no slouch considering 16 of the questions were out right attacks on Perry from the Moderators.
Thanks for showing us all the original thread - it re-affirms that FR’s Admins & Owner are competent at filtering out at least the most mindless of drivel....
Where the heck have you been since 1999? Under a rock?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.