Posted on 08/03/2011 7:08:38 PM PDT by traumer
A female babysitter had sex with the 14-year-old she was hired to look after after plying him with alcohol, it has been reported.
Loni Bouchard, from Clinton, Connecticut, was taken into custody after the young boy's family found out about the alleged affair. The 20-year-old now faces charges that she sexually assaulted the boy last month after illegally buying him alcohol.
Authorities said they obtained a warrant after a complaint from a family member of the teenager. She then turned herself in to Southington police on Friday morning. Sergeant Lowell DePalma said the victim knew the babysitter before the alleged assault took place.
Bouchard, who has been released after posting a $1,000 bond following arraignment, faces charges of second-degree sexual assault, purchasing alcohol for a minor and two counts of risk of injury to a minor. She is being charged in two separate areas in Connecticut on similar charges.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
You can't characterize it as judgmental. Nice side-step.
And putting that aside, are we now agreed that cinta prajna is accurately described as a Buddhist concept?
Was post #187 not clear enough for you? Having already conceded that, without caveat, you can only be flogging that dead horse as a deflection.
Perhaps the first sidestep was in carefully phrasing your protestation of innocence. "Forget if it was nasty and personal. It wasn't strictly judgmental!"
Having already conceded that
Fair enough.
I'll also point out that observing that a specific, individual woman is unattractive (inside and out) is hardly "denigrating women" in general.
Miss Bouchard denigrated herself by plying a young boy in her charge with alcohol for her own sexual enjoyment.
It would indeed be denigrating women to make someone like this Bouchard person out to be a representative of women in general.
Gotta disagree with that. Despite my inner 14 year old boy desire to give this kid a high five, the 20 year old female is supposed to be the adult and should know better. She was entrusted with his care by his parents and even if the whole thing was the boys idea and he begged and begged (which my inner 14 year old boy can relate to), she is supposed to diffuse the situation and rebuff his advances.
That is non-sequitur. Neither one of us had brought up any other aspect of it so there is no side-step at all. But you are still deflecting from the subject.
I'll also point out that observing that a specific, individual woman is unattractive (inside and out) is hardly "denigrating women" in general.
The Dharma doesn't make that distinction. The admonition about denigrating women applies in both the specific and the general. Another side-step from the subject and the question I asked about who gave those admonitions. Your ignorance of your own behavior is really quite astounding. But boring.
Yep, that’s about the pinnacle of your level of argument
The article says that she was charged with that, but supplies no evidence, nor logical persuasion in support.
Any normal male can see through this article.
Yet the irony of this statement is not lost on me.
When you yourself are lost does it really matter? LOL
As for all the sickness on this thread - what can I say. Every time, that’s all that happens here. Bunch of sex fiends.
<><><><<
Hilarious. You know exactly what these threads devolve into, but like the proverbial train wreck, regardless of how they offend you, you have to come in, read, and let us know how awful we are.
It didn’t occur to you I actually came to read the NEWS article?
But damn straight I am going to comment on the comments I see. I do every thread I pick. It’s a forum, after all.
And likewise, you supply absolutely no evidence.
Let me ask a different question: why did a 14 year old need a babysitter, anyway?
Choke... cough. Beer out nose. That hurt.
OBTW, “too fast.” Grammar, you know.
Pardon me, I have to go blow my nose.
How did a 20-yo girl buy alchohol to ply him with in the first place?
Would that not be ... illegal? Except in LA, I think - not sure.
A lot of very hard-up guys post here though, apparently, from the praise this babysitter has gotten on the thread.
LMAO. So you don't like her looks... too bad. I don't think she is bad looking at all. Lets see a picture of you . And why are you here? YOU must be really hard up for all the posts you have made. And making posts which have nothing to do with the topic of this thread. Yup hard up!
One cannot argue at any level if one does not actually read the articles upon which he is commenting.
If he comes to believe that sex is nothing more than the shallow "relationship" he's had with this rapist, that will deprive him of the proper understanding of intimacy for the rest of his life.
You still haven’t said what is damaged or how one would know there is damage, so you write stuff about me...I understand completely. Thanks
Yes, I have in very great detail. The fact that you don't understand sexual intimacy -- and why throwing it away casually makes someone a diminished person -- makes me inclined to pity, rather than scorn, you. But whether you deserve compassion or ridicule, you have been fully answered, to wit: An adult can [foolishly] make a decision to treat sex like a ride at Disneyland, but a child should not be forced to.
I write "stuff" about you because you are apparently unable to think linearly, and because I answered you thoughtfully and you responded with nonsense that was either completely irrelevant, or blatantly ignorant of what I had in fact written.
Please do tell me: why do you believe it is illegal to have sex with children? Or are you of the opinion it should not be?
If I recall the words to that gawdawful dreck of a “song” correctly, the balladeer was seventeen. There’s a lot of difference between a seventeen year old and a fourteen year old. I also do not believe the woman in the ballad got the younger man drunk.
What, you mean a 20 year old who commits the crime of having sex with a 14 year old is not going to commit a crime by using a fake ID to buy alcohol? Seriously?
I bought alcohol underage with a fake ID. It was not difficult. Illegal, sure, but pretty easy. In fact, I seem to recall finding a place when I was home from college where I didn't need the fake ID. They never asked to see my ID.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.