[TigersEye]

Can we characterize that statement as eirenic?

You can't characterize it as judgmental. Nice side-step.

And putting that aside, are we now agreed that cinta prajna is accurately described as a Buddhist concept?

Was post #187 not clear enough for you? Having already conceded that, without caveat, you can only be flogging that dead horse as a deflection.

[wideawake]

You can't characterize it as judgmental. Nice side-step.

Perhaps the first sidestep was in carefully phrasing your protestation of innocence. "Forget if it was nasty and personal. It wasn't strictly judgmental!"

Having already conceded that

Fair enough.

I'll also point out that observing that a specific, individual woman is unattractive (inside and out) is hardly "denigrating women" in general.

Miss Bouchard denigrated herself by plying a young boy in her charge with alcohol for her own sexual enjoyment.

It would indeed be denigrating women to make someone like this Bouchard person out to be a representative of women in general.