FYI
A jury aware of their rights would have been able to decide for themselves whether it was admissible evidence or not.
Thank the supreme court of 1895 for deciding that “jurors need not be informed of their rights”
The judge goofed. I wonder if he considered her dancing in a hot body contest while her recently deceased child decomposed, inflammatory? How is it not yet this is?
When the oath says, “The WHOLE truth . .”, they really don’t mean it.
At least she’s consistent. Even in the video it’s all about her and not Caylee.
She’s so incredibly guilty and will likely take her own life or someone will do it for her.
What’s the inflammatory video about....anyone know?
This should have been left in from the start.
The reason it is infammatory for those who didn’t follow the trial, is that this showed how Casey reacted when she KNEW that her daughters body was found by being told the location.
There were times before when bone had been located and Casey was told they were in places like Blanchard Park. On those times there was no reaction.
On this tape, Casey knew Caylee had been found where she had dumped her, and she reacted with a meltdown. The tears were for herself, not her little girl.
?????????If she was doubled over hyperventilating at the news of her daughters dead body being found. Wouldn’t that have made her more sympathetic to the jury? The article makes it sound like it wouldn’t.
Where’s the “Star Chamber” when you need one?
Any news on the “Path to 9/11” video?