?????????If she was doubled over hyperventilating at the news of her daughters dead body being found. Wouldn’t that have made her more sympathetic to the jury? The article makes it sound like it wouldn’t.
However, I do agree that had it been left in the defense would have used it for the very reason you stated. And with this jury, no doubt they would have succeeded.
If compared with suspected remains and her reaction to Blanchard Park find (which turned out to be nothing), vs. when the body (unidentified at that point) was found they were remarkably contrasting.
But, I agree, if shown in and of itself it could have worked for the defense in my opinion... At that point, the child was supposedly kidnapped by the nanny, etc etc. as far as the defense was concerned. The defense put forth during the trial didn’t come out to family until 6 weeks before trial they say. Who knows. I think they plotted for three years on the defense.
They did not know it was Caylee yet they told her a body had been found and where.The tears were because she knew where she left the body and they were for her not her child.When she had been told of other remains she did nt have the same reaction.