Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Casey Anthony Video Deemed "Too Inflammatory" For Trial May Soon Be Released
chashutchersonblogspot.com ^ | July 11, 2011 | chashutcherson/thehollywoodgossip

Posted on 07/12/2011 6:50:38 AM PDT by truthkeeper

Tape may be released. Judge Perry will make this call.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: anthony; caseyanthony; caylee; cayleeanthony
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: cradle of freedom

Insessions message board and web sleuths had a lot if discussions on all aspects of the case. Goerge fell prey to an expensive Nigerian scam. Haha. That was in depositions I think. I know websleuths had every document and video released by ocsd and timelines and links to every interview and media report ect. They have a ton of stuff if you have countless hours to research. All fascinating. You will even find the interviews with cindys mom, emails to and from her and cindys brother who called Cindy and Casey for what they were and did.


101 posted on 07/12/2011 5:10:59 PM PDT by commonguymd (Freedom is a myth anymore it seems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

Well, we’ll never know but...I still maintain he should put distance between himself and that crowd as he is young and can begin his life anew.


102 posted on 07/12/2011 5:12:50 PM PDT by cubreporter (From TEA to Shining TEA - Go Rush Limbaugh..a giant of all that is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter

He isn’t working. Living off Mallory and likely unemployment waiting on the family payday at the expense of a child’s murder. That’s my personal take. I think he just parked cars for a living anyway. Can’t recall.


103 posted on 07/12/2011 5:17:37 PM PDT by commonguymd (Freedom is a myth anymore it seems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

My friend’s little grandson is 12. I predict that when he is about 17, he will suddenly get a new little sibling. That will ensure another 18 years of servitude for my poor friend.


104 posted on 07/12/2011 5:23:31 PM PDT by Melian ("I can't spare this [wo]man; [s]he fights!" (Apologies to Abe Lincoln) Go, Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: MsLady

I don’t think this will haunt her at all. I think you have to have a soul, heart, and conscience to feel guilt, remorse- to be haunted by your actions. Casey has not shown me that she has a thought that goes beyond herself.

I do believe she is mentally ill, and that doesn’t excuse her at all in my book. It was ruled that she was sane enough to stand trial but she is far from sane. My mother was an indian and believed in evil spirits, and believed people could be taken over by them- if my mother had lived to see this unfold she would have said Casey was taken by evil spirits.


105 posted on 07/12/2011 5:37:12 PM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
I hope they keep the heat on to further investigate. I don't think this should be the end of it, as it usually is when someone is tried and acquitted. I know double jeopardy is an issue with charging Casey with the murder, but if they find more evidence there are other things they could charge her with and if others are involved they need to be held responsible for their part.
106 posted on 07/12/2011 5:48:04 PM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
One of the huge arguments many have held here is that we should “respect the jury’s decision.” I’m seeing now that the SEIU was found not guilty in the Gladney case. This is yet another miscarriage of justice, and on that, I’m sure we all agree. But the question I have to ask is: why is it ok to dispute that verdict, but not the Casey Anthony verdict?

I can't believe the number of people on FR who think it's wrong to speak against this verdict. I would have voted GUILTY.

107 posted on 07/12/2011 6:07:41 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Yeah, I am still having difficulty seeing what happened. Watched all of the trial. Could not believe they didn’t even convict on lesser charges than 1st degree...


108 posted on 07/12/2011 6:24:06 PM PDT by PghBaldy (War Powers Res: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/warpower.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

The defense had to put a reason out there for Casey’s bizarre behavior- abuse is one that most of us have been programmed to accept, especially sexual abuse. I have no idea if she was abused in any way by anyone but I know I was wondering how she ended up with the personality she has. She either has some sort of mental illness or she has had some sort of off the wall upbringing.


109 posted on 07/12/2011 6:26:57 PM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
I went back and watched parts again...like when the first “Not Guilty” was read....She smirked....watch closely...it was very brief....and then changed back to a serious look...our little chameleon!!
110 posted on 07/12/2011 6:29:19 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

111 posted on 07/12/2011 6:35:34 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

The Gladney trial should be investigated.


112 posted on 07/12/2011 6:41:40 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter

If you are referring to George; maybe he should think about leaving.


113 posted on 07/12/2011 6:44:34 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Now, now, we must respect the verdict of the jury. They found the thugs not guilty. Whatta you all want? A police state? /big old sarc tag LOL


114 posted on 07/12/2011 6:46:30 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Now that made me smile.


115 posted on 07/12/2011 6:55:43 PM PDT by truthkeeper (Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
I can't believe the number of people on FR who think it's wrong to speak against this verdict. I would have voted GUILTY.

A lot of people around here hate the government more than they hate a baby killer.

There, I said it.

116 posted on 07/12/2011 6:58:02 PM PDT by truthkeeper (Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8
She either has some sort of mental illness or she has had some sort of off the wall upbringing.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048977/

117 posted on 07/12/2011 7:00:14 PM PDT by truthkeeper (Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: JKeats
I mean, after Rodney King and O.J.Simpson, what was left? My view of life drastically changed after the Rodney King verdict. Actually, there were three epiphanies in my life like that: 1) Rodney King: Seeing a man beaten on video and the assailants being set free (forget subsequent trials).

I'd like to point out one thing regarding the first Rodney King verdict.

When the police involved were first charged, there was great public outrage from local and national civil rights leaders, including Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

The problem was that the District Attorney charged the police with the offense that he believed they committed and that he believed he could prove. That was not sufficient for civil rights leaders. They wanted the police involved charged with the maximum possible charges that could be brought against police officers - the type of charges that would be brought if the police had shot or beat King with the intent to kill him.

There was some mumbling in legal circles at the time to the effect that "hmmm . . . that may be overreaching, because these police didn't know they were being observed and videotaped; if they intended to kill King, they would have done it." Now, those may not be the precise facts, but they're close and I'd welcome someone with better memory or the time to research it to chime in.

But the fact is that the District Attorney bowed to political pressure and very possibly overcharged the police involved. It was like having a suspect and evidence pointing toward second-degree manslaughter, but deciding to charge him or her with first-degree murder because of public and national protests.

The prosecution lost its gamble with increasing the charges. Commentators after the verdict pointed out that the prosecution had charged the police with an offense that may have been beyond what was done to King, no matter how horrific the acts done to King.

Would the jury have convicted the police on the lesser counts? I don't know. Racial prejudice could well have come into play, as we all know. But one thing is for certain - the District Attorney was coerced by political pressure into increasing the charges against the police officers beyond what many thought were the appropriate and provable charges. And the prosecution failed.

If you have that manslaughter-in-the-second-degree suspect and he's found not guilty when the states charge him with first-degree murder, it's fine for the public to be outraged that the suspect got away with second-degree manslaughter. But it's not fine for the public to be outraged that the suspect got away with first-degree murder. Because the suspect didn't commit first-degree murder.

That was the lesson of the Rodney King verdict, and of many other verdicts where prosecutors overreach on the charges . . . and yet the public is not prepared to listen to that lesson, much less learn it.

I welcome any comments on these thoughts.

118 posted on 07/12/2011 7:02:15 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
Now, now, we must respect the verdict of the jury

Yes, they saw all the evidence and after all, we weren't there.
(Even bigger sarc tag)

119 posted on 07/12/2011 7:03:43 PM PDT by truthkeeper (Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

You could be right. My feeling is though, sometimes what you’ve done in your past does come back to haunt you at some point. And you don’t have to be an Indian to believe in evil spirits. I believe in possession. I also believe a lot of truly evil people are possessed and Casey could be one. You don’t see that kind of coldness coming from many people.


120 posted on 07/12/2011 7:04:53 PM PDT by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson