I've watched most of this trial and it has had a lot of fluff with very little substance from either side, probably the normal case. Today is substance and the records today will almost certainly show that Cindy was in fact at work the day the computer searches supposedly happened.
But out of all of Baez's failures he did have one big success: He showed that the computer software used by the cops is JUNK SOFTWARE and can't be trusted, as I'll explain below. The talking heads on shows like Nancy (dis)Grace hardly mention it because I think it goes over their heads.
Program A couldn't deal with Daylight Savings Time changes but it found the 84th Facebook login, the 83rd Facebook login, and the 82nd Facebook login, and a few searches for chloroform.
Program B handles Daylight Savings Time but can't count and completely omitted the Facebook logins. Instead it claims chloroform was searched 84 times and this is what all the talking heads regurgitate. Trouble is, it can't point to the 83rd search nor any other previous searches.
84??? Sound familiar? Sounds like it mixed up the Facebook records with the chloroform entries. (Besides, searching 84 times for one subject is not very believable to start with.) And if I can't trust it to keep it straight between Facebook and Google I don't trust it to keep the exact times and dates straight either.
If I was on the jury and could look at these reports to verify that I heard this correctly, then premeditated, death-chamber murder is completely off the table.
BTW, I don't believe either the prosecution’s theory or the defense theory.
Interesting information on the facebook/google searches, libertylover. It could be the focus on chloroform is a mute point. The child was found with duct tape wrapped around her head (nose and mouth), three times.
Casey Anthony trial experts describe tot's bones Now that would suffocate/kill her w/or w/o chloroform.
Why three times....who knows. I guess to make sure. The duct tape couldn't have been on the bag and transferred to the child's skull. It was likely the cause of her death, not some wierd thing done after her death.
Anyone know whether there was any evidence presented about sleeping pills in the house or something that would have insured the child was pliant while wrapping her?
An interesting note was that the cadavre (human decompostion) dog made his final alert (settled on) the back passenger seat where it meets the trunk border when inspecting the car. It could be the smell was strongest there vs. closer to the fender/trunk area. Or possibly the child was in a carseat when she was killed/began decomposing and later "bagged up" and moved to the trunk. That is where most people smelled the "dead body" smell - when the trunk was open. The dog picked the back seat where it is adjacent to the trunk.
BTW, that same dog was able to indicate a body buried underneath a garage floor in an earlier case.