Posted on 06/19/2011 6:26:36 AM PDT by decimon
PARIS (AFP) European aerospace giant EADS on Sunday unveiled its "Zero Emission Hypersonic Transportation" (Zehst) rocket plane it hopes will be able to fly from Paris to Tokyo in 2.5 hours by around 2050.
"I imagine the plane of the future to look like Zehst," EADS' chief technical officer Jean Botti said as the project was announced at Le Bourget airport the day before the start of the Paris International Air Show.
The low-pollution plane to carry between 50 and 100 passengers will take off using normal engines powered by biofuel made from seaweed before switching on its rocket engines at altitude.
The rocket engines, powered by hydrogen and oxygen whose only exhaust is water vapour, propel the plane to a cruising altitude of 32 kilometres (20 miles), compared to today's passenger jets which fly at around 10,000 metres.
"You don't pollute, you're in the stratosphere," Botti said.
To land, the pilot cuts the engines and glides down to Earth before reigniting the regular engines before landing.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
A bit overly dramatic, don't you think? The tiniest leak would not be noticed. A little bigger and you could compensate by increasing the oxygen flow. And you aren't in orbit -- as long as it isn't sudden depressurization, you do what any plane does today: Lower your altitude/speed. I'd still want a pressure suit. But since you aren't building the space station it need not be so terribly sophisticated.
Not to mention that the only aviation facilities I am aware of that have the ability to handle large amounts of cryogenic hydrogen and oxygen belong to NASA. To my knowledge there is no space launch or support facilities in either Paris or Tokyo, so that relegates this entire story to Science Fiction.
LOX, no problem. It is a standard industrial material. Even your podunk local hospital has a LOX tank out back. And while engineers' hearts all go aflutter over the high ISP of hydrogen, the massive tanks you need and far higher cost of the fuel itself make kerosene a better choice for anything that has to return a profit.
Of course, even bringing up "green" in a launcher discussion, tells you all you need to know about the (lack of) seriousness of the people proposing this. Not to mention that even the healthiest European countries aren't looking too good. This ain't going anywhere anytime soon. And it will make the Concorde look like an economy flight from Chicago to Detroit by cost comparison.
OTOH, You dont pollute, youre in the stratosphere.
Ignition by Lucas. G
Thanks, I think I will walk.
We could never get the scramjets to perform anywhere near the needed thrust ratios, though, so the program was broken up into three research programs to work on this.
If you can get it (limited release), see my book, "The Hypersonic Revolution, vol. III: The Quest for the Orbital Jet."
Looks like the AF is offering it gratis, in PDF: http://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/Annotations/hallionhypersonic.htm
"O.K. We will now reignite the engines! Stand by..."
LOL! Well put.
LOL! Well put.
Great! Pretty boring stuff, although I write like a business historian, not a flight/aerospace historian, but I think there is some great stuff in there. (NASA wouldn’t publish this: too critical).
I haven’t read this so I don’t know what I’m talking about, however...the Air Force part in the space program might be more interesting than the NASA part. I say that cuz I’ve always been much more keen on X-20 than on Apollo. Lost much interest after X-15.
I do know that the AF continued with its projects to the extent they were allowed. But low-key.
The history was that NASP (X-20) was a joint DARPA/NASA/USAF/SDI/NAVY project that, before long, simply became a USAF/NASA project. NASA never really believed in the technology and the shuttle lobby was always trying to stall the program or minimize its accomplishments. On the other hand, the USAF overplayed the potential benefits of the program, especially in the civilian area. It was the “orbital” aspect that gave the program its sex appeal-—no one would fund a Mach-10 plane, which is what needed to happen first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.