The Troubling Election of Barack Obama ZOT 2 of 2

No Such Thing As An Opinion. Can YOU Outsmart Me? ^ | January 7, 2011 | NoSuchThingAsAnOpinion

[BeAFlyOnTheWall]

In this series of articles, I will refer to Barack Obama as Barry Soetoro.

You may be wondering why I've chosen to reference the name Barry Soetoro and not Barack Obama.  Simple.  I found more credible evidence (ie. actual documentation) that references the name Barry Soetoro rather than Barack Obama. Yes, really!

Now, how did this bizarre situation occur? How could there be so little existing evidence in support of such basic, non-controversial information: one's legal name?

Well, Soetoro has covered up the evidence!  So we simply don't know what his legal name is!

On January 21, 2009, amid the worst recession since the 1930s, was Soetoro in a rush to help the desperate economy?

Apparently not. On his first day in office, he acted to ensure that he could make it illegal for anyone to release particular documents about his life. Yes, really!

Here's the executive order he signed, order 13489. It states in part:

[smokingfrog]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2246507/posts

[BeAFlyOnTheWall]

Thanks for the link...it’s good to see that this was discovered early on...

[shibumi]

Britex Stainless Steel is a state-of-the-art plumbing fixture manufacturer located in Melbourne, Australia.

Britex Stainless Steel is famous for manufacturing urinals with built-in televisions, such as this one at Slattery Auctions. This picture was sent in by LJ at Britex. He writes: "These stainless steel waterfree urinals were recently installed in our very own male bathroom at Britex Stainless Steel HQ in Melbourne, Australia in an effort to do our part for the environment through water conservation. Being a large manufacturer of stainless steel products, it’s important to practice what we preach and install the same water saving urinals we sell to our clients in our own manufacturing facility. "Designed to function without any water, Britex Stainless Steel Barren waterfree urinals provide further benefits to the environment being manufactured from 100% recycled stainless steel. "Maintenance costs are also a thing of the past. Unlike other waterfree urinals that require regular maintenance and the replacement of cartridges or sealant fluids, the Barren waterfree urinal utilises a unique ‘one-way valve’. After urine has flowed through the valve, it closes up and traps all odour within the plumbing. The only maintenance Britex recommends is the occasional squirt of fresh water or disinfectant over the urinal surface, just like any other bathroom sanitary fixture. "The Barren ‘Auto-Clean’ model shown in the picture is supplied with an automated flushing mechanism that executes a micro-volume flush cycle periodically to ensure plumbing pipes are kept clean. A ‘Self-Cleaning Waterless Urinal’, if you will!"

[boatbums]

I knew this pic would come in handy! ;o)

[shibumi]

Well, the pimp is using this thread to advertise, might as well get everyone in on the act!

[BeAFlyOnTheWall]

Who’s using the thread to advertise? You don’t think Parts One to Six is a high quality conservative article?

[shibumi]

"You don’t think Parts One to Six is a high quality conservative article?"

How would I know? You haven't posted it yet.

You want to discuss your writing? Post it here.

All of it.

[bobby.223]

IBTZ! Oh for cryin’ out loud! Not this ‘E.O 13489/hussein’s records cover up’ crap again. This was debunked a long time ago, and many times also, right here on FR! Do your damn homework NOOB.

[shibumi]

You’d think he’d at least try pimping something original, right?

[Vendome]

thought you were suppose to be smarterest?

[Vendome]

Damnit, if right there you prove yuh ain’t the smartest!

Possessive sentence in a compound?

Sorry, I’s drp’d outa high skool and might not be straight on dis.

[bobby.223]

Yeah! Check the sign up date. Smells like troll material trying to possibly get FReepers stirred up with this long ago debunked bull. Maybe a few mighty and brave and highly trained kitties will soon be deployed on a super secret ZOT mission.

[BeAFlyOnTheWall]

Post all of it hear? For free? You mean you aren’t even willing to click a link to get free information?

[BeAFlyOnTheWall]

Been debunked? That there was an executive order that allows Obama to restrict release of his documents! So the link provided to the executive order is what....a fraud? Are you paid by Obama’s team to write such stuff?

[shibumi]

"Post all of it hear?"

No. Post all of it here.

"For free?"

That's right. We promise not to charge you for the privilege.

"You mean you aren’t even willing to click a link to get free information?

Damn, Zippy! You're starting to catch on!

[shibumi]

By the way - what was your native (first) language?

[BeAFlyOnTheWall]

My first language was a unique one that few people can speak. It’s called:

“Silencing troublemakers with overwhelming logic”

[bobby.223]

IBTZ. For God’s sake sonny! Okay, one more time for you slow learner...Do your OWN damn homework!!! W. and R.R. signed the same type E.O!!! Do you have to work to be this foolish NOOB?? ALL of this, ‘hussein signed an E.O. to hide his past’, has been out and debunked for a LONG time so take your garbage back over to the DUmp and quit trying to stir up FR with this troll thread of yours. I see other posters here tonight aren’t having any trouble seeing through your nonsense either.

[BeAFlyOnTheWall]

First, are you claiming that the executive order Obama signed was the exact same as the one Bush signed? It wasn’t.

Second, did Bush use the exec order to hide documents from his past? To hide his grades? His birth certificate?

No.

Did Bush claim he was going to be transparent like Obama did? No. Therefore, it’s news that Obama would sign this document on the first day. It doesn’t matter whether Bush or others signed a similar document, because the article was about Obama, not Bush.

Anyway, the E.O. is a small part of the article. Even if it turned out that the writer of the article was wrong (which I’ve shown that he was not), it’s a tiny part of the article series.

If you aren’t able to think of potential alternative explanations to the points you make, perhaps you should think twice about speaking in the first place.