We hope you enjoyed the ride while you were here at FreeRepublic!
We know how you must be feeling right about now. :-) ...
First, are you claiming that the executive order Obama signed was the exact same as the one Bush signed? It wasn’t.
Second, did Bush use the exec order to hide documents from his past? To hide his grades? His birth certificate?
No.
Did Bush claim he was going to be transparent like Obama did? No. Therefore, it’s news that Obama would sign this document on the first day. It doesn’t matter whether Bush or others signed a similar document, because the article was about Obama, not Bush.
Anyway, the E.O. is a small part of the article. Even if it turned out that the writer of the article was wrong (which I’ve shown that he was not), it’s a tiny part of the article series.
If you aren’t able to think of potential alternative explanations to the points you make, perhaps you should think twice about speaking in the first place.
You STILL did not do the CORRECT homework!! Okay noob, you win. Your right and the countless FReepers over the past 2 or 3 years who have stated exactly what I have, and have been all over this ‘story’ from the start, are all wrong. I have a feeling the kitties are gonna be paying you a visit soon because FReepers sniff out trolls quite easily. Your not fooling anybody young Lib. noob. Just look at others posts to you here tonight, get it? Now off to bed, don’t want to be late for school tomorrow, mommie’s knock on her basement floor might not be loud enough to wake you up if you stay up much longer.
Obama has never used an executive order to hide records.
He has used private and federal attorneys and the private ones have been illegally paid from campaign funds.
And I think I know where this guy is getting his source material, but will reserve judgement — for now.