The IPCC's last report in 2007 stated "warming of the climate system is unequivocal" — a "fact" that Stocker said has not been challenged despite the IPCC recent troubles.Not been challenged?
What alternative universe does this pointy-headed liberal live in?
1 posted on
06/09/2011 4:25:58 PM PDT by
PROCON
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: steelyourfaith; Tolerance Sucks Rocks
2 posted on
06/09/2011 4:27:01 PM PDT by
PROCON
(Liberals Mistake Education and Knowledge for Wisdom and Common Sense.)
To: PROCON
"Thomas Stocker suggests the planet might be better off if it soared to "three to four" times its current level." Let's raise it ten times it current price. Forty dollars per gallon should be able to cure cancer! By raising it twenty times we should be able to pay for the invention of a drug to stop aging and thus achieve immortality. End Death! Increase the price of gas and the taxes on gasoline!
4 posted on
06/09/2011 4:33:17 PM PDT by
StormEye
To: PROCON
5 posted on
06/09/2011 4:34:25 PM PDT by
Bean Counter
(Your what hurts??)
To: PROCON
"This is scandalous, I know," said StockerIt's not scandalous. It's just really, really stupid.
Guy's nuttier than a porta potty at a peanut festival.
6 posted on
06/09/2011 4:35:35 PM PDT by
Maceman
To: PROCON
The planet would be better off, if we simply fired all the “climate experts”.
7 posted on
06/09/2011 4:35:44 PM PDT by
Cringing Negativism Network
(BUY AMERICAN. The job you save will be your son's, or your daughter's)
To: PROCON
8 posted on
06/09/2011 4:35:58 PM PDT by
Bean Counter
(Your what hurts??)
To: PROCON
Somebody may knock on his door early some morning and deliver a dose of reality.
10 posted on
06/09/2011 4:42:57 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
To: PROCON
The sky is falling!
How many of us remember when gas was $1.25 a gallon? Since then we have tripled the price of gas. So, we have already saved the planet.
I have an idea! Let’s have a mass extermination of human beings. That would reduce the amount of goods and services required for the existing populations and the necessary energy costs. Give these Global Warmists each a nuclear button. Yep! That’s the ticket.
11 posted on
06/09/2011 4:44:56 PM PDT by
jonrick46
(My)
To: PROCON
Elimination of climate “experts” will go a lot further to “saving” the planet
12 posted on
06/09/2011 4:45:48 PM PDT by
clamper1797
(Hoping to have some change left)
To: PROCON
He and the IPCC say there is no question the climate is changing because of the huge amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases wafting into the atmosphere through the burning of oil, gas and other fossil fuels.Well, since there is no question I will go to a greater source that can lead me in the right direction.
Tag lines can be so insightful...
13 posted on
06/09/2011 4:46:01 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: PROCON
How about we triple the price of a Bachelors of Science, A Masters, and a PHD in Sciences so we have a chance to save humanity from these tools?
16 posted on
06/09/2011 4:51:24 PM PDT by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar)
To: PROCON
Sure. Why not. That should bankrupt every economy in the world.
I know I could pay 4 times what I do now for fuel. I couldnt afford to eat or make my house payment, but WTF?
These are the intelligentsia we have teaching out College aged kids.
18 posted on
06/09/2011 4:58:35 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: PROCON
Another idiot heard from.
19 posted on
06/09/2011 5:03:34 PM PDT by
pallis
To: PROCON
He only has to wait. As “developing” countries increase manufacturing and consume more oil, gas prices will eventually triple.
20 posted on
06/09/2011 5:11:58 PM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in a thunderous avalanche of rottenness heard across the universe.)
To: PROCON
Gee..Go back to living in about 1880...no cars, no electricity, no flush toilets, no running water, horse powered agriculture or become Amish. I wonder how many media elites, Hollywood stars, politicians and environmentalist whackos would adopt this life style or would they be conveniently exempted?
21 posted on
06/09/2011 5:31:08 PM PDT by
The Great RJ
("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
To: PROCON
What alternative universe does this pointy-headed liberal live in?It's pretty hard to hear in Uranus...
22 posted on
06/09/2011 5:36:10 PM PDT by
SteamShovel
(The RADIATION PIMPS...are RATS)
To: PROCON
“I don’t have to pay for my gas/car so screw the rest of you”
Climatetard
24 posted on
06/09/2011 5:45:05 PM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: PROCON
If gasoline is so evil, outlaw it.
27 posted on
06/09/2011 6:56:54 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
To: PROCON; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
28 posted on
06/09/2011 8:53:19 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(I hate politically correct sorosmonkey superheroes!)
To: PROCON
Only a liberal could see that connection.
29 posted on
06/09/2011 8:58:26 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
