Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOL. Ron Paul just handed Chris Wallace his (liberal) hat. Wow.
Chris Wallace Comeuppance Vanity

Posted on 05/15/2011 11:34:54 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network

LOL!

OK I just decided.

If Palin doesn't run, Paul has my vote.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: fox; funny; paulestinians; paulkucinich12; ronpaul; ronpaulcantwin; shrimpboats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
To: Cringing Negativism Network

There is such a thing as a brain-dead libertarian and Ron Paul qualifies on all points. He’s absolutist as well as disorganized in his speech. I can make a good case that he is schizophrenic.


41 posted on 05/15/2011 12:21:08 PM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
is now a totally open-borders guy.

Along with being an open borders guy he's also a pro-homo marriage guy, a legalize heroin guy, and a "killing bin Laden violated international law" guy.

Because of the above, he's an unelectable guy.

42 posted on 05/15/2011 12:21:45 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Um.

What is a “freestudents.blogspot.com” and why in the world would I want to click on such a link?

How about just explaining, if you would?


43 posted on 05/15/2011 12:22:15 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Saul Alinsky, meet Donald Trump...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

RuPaul is not a Constitutionalist. A Constitutionalist defends the country. Paul would sacrifice it to extremists. Ta ta, RuPaul.


44 posted on 05/15/2011 12:25:17 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Ron Paul is believed to be a “fiscal conservative” and if you ask him he will tell you that he has never voted for an earmark. That statement is 100% correct. What Paul does is to make sure that the earmarks he wants are put into a bill, and then he votes against the bill. Its the best of all possible worlds. He gets to bring home the bacon on a local basis and makes the anti-earmark claim on a national basis.

http://www.redstate.com/jeffdunetz/2010/04/14/the-hypocrisy-of-congressman-ron-paul/

45 posted on 05/15/2011 12:27:07 PM PDT by McGruff (When it comes to Obama's birth certificate. Trust, but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Havisham

OK I’ll continue wearing my Ron Paul had for a while, since I started this.

Think for a moment about our current situation.

We have a foreign born Marxist liar in the Whitehouse, yet this week he has actually come out in favor of domestic drilling.

Just to say, even the most radical aspects of a president can be balanced.

On balance, Paul is quite remarkably on the right track.

Congress and the Senate can take care of the statist, meddlesome central government part - since they already do.


46 posted on 05/15/2011 12:27:40 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Saul Alinsky, meet Donald Trump...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

You want to know, you click on it. Your shrimp boy is an odious hypocrite, and this is just the tip of the iceberg.


47 posted on 05/15/2011 12:28:08 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

I kind of like him ever since he made Bill Clinton jab a thumb in his chest. I think he’s pretty good. But I gave up Fox News. I was paying like 70 a month for expanded cable and all I seemed to watch was Fox News. Now I’m down to about 20 a month for cable, and I haven’t had the TV on all day.


48 posted on 05/15/2011 12:28:13 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Which Founders? Thomas Jefferson, whose authorized WAR (yes, that's what he called it, not "police action") against the Barbary Pirates with only a Joint Resolution of Congress would NEVER have been supported by Paul? That Founder? Or Alexander Hamilton, who supported a national bank much like the Fed? That Founder?

Or James Madison, who introduced an amendment to the Constitution during the debates to explicitly AUTHORIZE Congress to incorporate institutions such as the bank? That Founder? Or do you have some other mythical founders in mind that I don't know about?

49 posted on 05/15/2011 12:28:31 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Really? You’ll vote for a guy that thinks killing OBL was not necessary?


50 posted on 05/15/2011 12:29:58 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Perhaps the founders who threw off a central government intent on taxation, and which supported our new nation with tariffs.

We’ve ventured quite a bit off that path.


51 posted on 05/15/2011 12:30:18 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Saul Alinsky, meet Donald Trump...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

Its funny, isn’t it, how much the globalists hate anyone who may threaten their dominance over the American people and their looting of the American economy.

You can spot them immediately by their words.


52 posted on 05/15/2011 12:32:10 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

A lot of people don’t like the use of our citizen soldiers as globalist assassins.

Some Americans still believe in the American creed of justice delivered by trial under the rule of law.


53 posted on 05/15/2011 12:34:12 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Because the motor voter absentee ballot election fraudsters won’t let him?


54 posted on 05/15/2011 12:35:41 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

He’s a libertarian? He’s a republican!


55 posted on 05/15/2011 12:36:42 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dangus

“Ron Paul did a 180 on immigration, and is now a totally open-borders guy. This comes after a career of being “pro-life” but consistently finding an excuse to vote with the party of death. I don’t trust him further than I could throw him.”

I don’t like him and don’t trust him, either. But if he is on the ticket against Obama, I’ll vote for him. He at least is likely to poke a sharp stick in the eye of the Fed. If Mitt is heading the ticket against Obama, on the other hand, I probably won’t see enough difference between the candidates to bother to go to the polls.


56 posted on 05/15/2011 12:42:02 PM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

If under the most unlikely circumstances Ron Paul manages to win the Republican nomination, I’ll support him a 1000 percent. I would do no less for my garbage man. I honestly don’t know who I want to win the nomination at this point in time. Sarah, Michelle, Herman, are among my favorites at the moment. There could be others before I settle in on one.


57 posted on 05/15/2011 12:43:57 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Ron Paul is OLD! He would be the oldest man ever elected President. Occasionally his mind is already starting to go wobbly. No Thanks!


58 posted on 05/15/2011 12:48:22 PM PDT by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
So Paul came across like the NUT that he is and that turned you on??? You need help, and soon. He spews Freedom and Constitution and then ruins it all with his idiocy.
59 posted on 05/15/2011 12:49:04 PM PDT by fish hawk (Obama = "low-level socialist organizer". Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weston

Ageism rules.


60 posted on 05/15/2011 12:49:51 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Saul Alinsky, meet Donald Trump...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson