Posted on 05/15/2011 11:34:54 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
LOL!
OK I just decided.
If Palin doesn't run, Paul has my vote.
There is such a thing as a brain-dead libertarian and Ron Paul qualifies on all points. He’s absolutist as well as disorganized in his speech. I can make a good case that he is schizophrenic.
Along with being an open borders guy he's also a pro-homo marriage guy, a legalize heroin guy, and a "killing bin Laden violated international law" guy.
Because of the above, he's an unelectable guy.
Um.
What is a “freestudents.blogspot.com” and why in the world would I want to click on such a link?
How about just explaining, if you would?
RuPaul is not a Constitutionalist. A Constitutionalist defends the country. Paul would sacrifice it to extremists. Ta ta, RuPaul.
http://www.redstate.com/jeffdunetz/2010/04/14/the-hypocrisy-of-congressman-ron-paul/
OK I’ll continue wearing my Ron Paul had for a while, since I started this.
Think for a moment about our current situation.
We have a foreign born Marxist liar in the Whitehouse, yet this week he has actually come out in favor of domestic drilling.
Just to say, even the most radical aspects of a president can be balanced.
On balance, Paul is quite remarkably on the right track.
Congress and the Senate can take care of the statist, meddlesome central government part - since they already do.
You want to know, you click on it. Your shrimp boy is an odious hypocrite, and this is just the tip of the iceberg.
I kind of like him ever since he made Bill Clinton jab a thumb in his chest. I think he’s pretty good. But I gave up Fox News. I was paying like 70 a month for expanded cable and all I seemed to watch was Fox News. Now I’m down to about 20 a month for cable, and I haven’t had the TV on all day.
Or James Madison, who introduced an amendment to the Constitution during the debates to explicitly AUTHORIZE Congress to incorporate institutions such as the bank? That Founder? Or do you have some other mythical founders in mind that I don't know about?
Really? You’ll vote for a guy that thinks killing OBL was not necessary?
Perhaps the founders who threw off a central government intent on taxation, and which supported our new nation with tariffs.
We’ve ventured quite a bit off that path.
Its funny, isn’t it, how much the globalists hate anyone who may threaten their dominance over the American people and their looting of the American economy.
You can spot them immediately by their words.
A lot of people don’t like the use of our citizen soldiers as globalist assassins.
Some Americans still believe in the American creed of justice delivered by trial under the rule of law.
Because the motor voter absentee ballot election fraudsters won’t let him?
He’s a libertarian? He’s a republican!
“Ron Paul did a 180 on immigration, and is now a totally open-borders guy. This comes after a career of being pro-life but consistently finding an excuse to vote with the party of death. I dont trust him further than I could throw him.”
I don’t like him and don’t trust him, either. But if he is on the ticket against Obama, I’ll vote for him. He at least is likely to poke a sharp stick in the eye of the Fed. If Mitt is heading the ticket against Obama, on the other hand, I probably won’t see enough difference between the candidates to bother to go to the polls.
If under the most unlikely circumstances Ron Paul manages to win the Republican nomination, I’ll support him a 1000 percent. I would do no less for my garbage man. I honestly don’t know who I want to win the nomination at this point in time. Sarah, Michelle, Herman, are among my favorites at the moment. There could be others before I settle in on one.
Ron Paul is OLD! He would be the oldest man ever elected President. Occasionally his mind is already starting to go wobbly. No Thanks!
Ageism rules.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.