Posted on 05/01/2011 6:40:13 PM PDT by ml/nj
People can scream about the constitution all they want but removing Obama wouldn’t address the roots of our problems.
Obozo is NOT the source of our problems.
We’re teaching marxism from preschool thru college now and our government is overrun with radical progressive bureaucrats. Removing Obama won’t even begin to address those issues.
Not just yet he's not. But this little controversy will be added to that ever growing pile of crap that is tipping the scales AWAY from his favor.
They've been doing that now for 40+ years......we gotta lot of catching up to do....after the war.
You've been posting the same thing for a week. I guess no one else has bothered to ask.
What is a "back round"?
I’d expect no less from a childish man that gives opponents the bird while “debating”.
I suggest that when the truth comes out about the fraud, (Little Stevie Dunham, whether before or after the elections of 2012), that NO ONE....I mean NO ONE beside those that have done the Herculean research all along on this issue, get a damned DIME for their books, outlining the biggest scam ever perpetrated on America——Not a dime to Glenn Beck, not a dime to Bill O’Reilly, not a dime to Ann Coulter, not a dime to Karl Rove....NO ONE but the patriots that have done the heavy lifting.
You watch-—after the fraud is outed, all of these naysayers will be falling all over each other to “tell the truth” in THEIR “new” books....
NOT ONE DAMNED DIME to them.
Yes. If it's all we get to do is hammer away at Obama's credibility, then it's a worth while effort going after Obama and his new bogus birth certificate. Obama will need better than luck changing the minds of the majority that he's nothing but a lying louse as is his bogus birth certificates.
Ha! Spell check flags backround and suggests the two word "back round"
Me, I always thought it was one word.
But to the subject at hand, the paper its self has an image already printed on it, the type should overlay with the "backround" intact and complete with no compromise, i.e. "halo" affect.
I would expect some anomalies from almost any scan, but how many I'm not sure.
50 years ago we may hypothesize that a document was created using the most commonly used technology of the day.
We may further hypothesize that through the years the document was transformed into a fiche image, and that, in turn, was converted to a digital image, and finally it was sliced, diced, and analyzed in infinite detail to create a new "searchable" digital image.
Today it's resident as part of a database. When somebody wants a "copy" they download the database elements, stick it together, and write it out as a .jpg or some other format, and then print it. Printing invariably requires formatting to fit the capability of the printer.
Just because this document exhibits characteristics beyond what you can imagine doesn't mean it's fake, or that it's not fake. It is what it is.
You mean ‘background’ ?
The defenders of the COLB say that the layers have to do with scanners and OCR software arbitrarily separating things into layers. The newsies seem to be happy with that explanation. But, I have been looking for a reason this happens with this COLB. Here is what I have discovered.
Irrefutable proof of cut and paste assembly.
There are three types of text, pre-printed, typewritten, and ink stamped. And, then there are the pre-printed graphics. One would expect that the pre-printed graphics would be the same color as the preprinted text. One would expect the typewritten text somewhat different. And one would expect the ink stamps to be different again, and different from each other.
I have found that most of the pre-printed text matches the typewritten text, instead of the pre-printed graphics. OOPS! Also, The record number that is inkstamped, matches exactly to the typewritten and pre-printed text, EXCEPT for the last “1” which is a different color. So, we are supposed to believe that an ink stamp, or ink pad would make two different colors in one motion? The date accepted stamps are even stranger. The stamp in box 22 has two colors also, the 19 and the 1 at the end are different from the rest of it. The stamp in box 20 has identical digits to the stamp in box 22, but it has two colors also. But, not the same two as in box 22. So, here we are supposed to believe that one ink stamp can print two colors on a single motion, and two different set of two on the next motion.
Some other findings... Stanley’s signature is half one color and half another color. Part of the K in U K L Lee is the wrong color. The check boxes down to 6d are one color and the ones belox are another color. There are at least three different colors of ink in the Doctors check box.
None of the inconstancy is random, not one letter, number or line is partially one color and partially another. Only whole characters are the wrong color.
If you would like to verify what I see, try this. Open the COLB with Photoshop. Select Enhance, Adjust color, replace color. Click on one of the triangles next to the signatures and replace that color with something bright and distinctive. Take a look at what portions of the doc are still black. Repeat this procedure to replace the colors of various parts of the COLB with an assortment of distinctive colors. When you get to a point where there are no more black caricatures, you are ready to analyze the results. What this process does is emphasize the subtle differences in the printed colors.
You will notice that there are numerous. You will see that I have not begun to cover them all here.
I'm not saying it was changed. I'm saying it was composed. It's a fraud.
As far as I'm concerned, anyone who doesn't care about this is brain dead.
ML/NJ
It's bogus. The M in AM or PM was preprinted in a small font as part of the form at that time.
ML/NJ
Just sayin.....
ML/NJ
I am curious what Corsi's book will bring to the fore, which is not in the current mix. I think birth in Kenya is nearly out of the question--I can't imagine any reason for Stanley Ann to go there unless accompanied by Obama senior, whose records supposedly show no travel back to Kenya before traveling from Hawaii to Harvard. I would not rule out Barack Jr. being born in Canada, since Stanley Ann was in Seattle shortly thereafter. I think that the Obama-Dunham marriage was a sham designed to cover the fact that Frank Davis was his father. Thus the divorce was required after a reasonable interval so she could get on with her life. I think this is a more likely scenario than grandpa Stan being the father and an unknown black woman being the mother.
I agree that this is a trivial issue compared to the whole country going down the toilet, but there is little we internet trolls can do to influence Congress, the Supreme Court or the Federal Reserve. So whether or not this leads to anything I still find it fascinating.
Oy, yes....Good God, do I feel stupid.....talk about a brain fart........shame shame, turning multiple shades of red here....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.