Just sayin.....
Just sayin.....
ML/NJ
the numbers are supposed to be on other COPLB’s also, not just these two, however, I haven’t seen the NORDYKE COLB to compare
However, these numerals you show, are NOT identical as I thought, there is a slight difference in spacing and alignment, BUT IDENTICAL IN PENMANSHIP
notice the numeral 2 on line 7....you really have to ask why something that was a "fraud" two years ago would have that same number on that same line????
Whoa! Now that is weird, to say the least!
Those penciled in numbers are on the twins BC as well. They have a code system to minimize mistakes. For example the 2 is for an x to be typed into the second box. The 9 is code for race, ie 1 is for white, 9 is for unknown. When compare the twins BC to these it becomes clear.
Interesting - not only is the same pencilled number 2 on both lines 7... but the one on the right shows the name BHO2...and the one on the left is just BHO.
The strange anomalies are - strange.
Read this please.
There’s something that we need to know for sure.
The explanation on HRS 333.17.8 does not hold water. “People” say it was not enacted until 1982. But that isn’t the end of the story.
It could merely be section (c) that was added or changed in 1982. Or some other change was made.
We need a PRINT COPY of a Statute book from sometime before 1982. From HI.
*OR*
Someone in HI to do a physical check on the SESSIONS OF CONGRESS from HI to see WHAT WAS CHANGED according to the notations at the end of HRS 338.17.8.
The session history will tell the EXACT amendment to the laws. It’s not something they can hide.
If it can be proved that 338.17.8 existed PRIOR to 1982, then the “Forgery” may not be one.
A physical examination of the written Congressional Session from HI will tell the tale. Someone on the ground needs to go look and post a copy. Not trust a (leftist) law librarian.
I Find it VERY ODD that the statue (Supposedly written in 1982) reference filing a birth certificate for TERRITORIAL CHILDREN when the territory ended in 1959.