Posted on 04/28/2011 4:57:51 AM PDT by mouseanony83
This debunks the “layers” problem.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2711316/posts?page=84#84
Spookie:
God knows why a clerk would select “African” as a race. Could have been an old-school hippie. Have you definitively seen ALL Hawaii birth certificates for blacks during that time frame to show this is truly exceptional?
I consider the claims of forgery about as logical as the claims Bush knew there were no WMDs in Iraq.
If Bush knew this, his peeps were so stupid they wouldn’t bring some along to “find?” I can accept them being this dishonest, I can’t accept them being this stupid. The absence of WMDs to me is an indication Bush expected them to be found.
Similarly, the government or the Democratic Party or Acorn surely has access to people capable of doing a competent forgery. At least in the form of a pdf.
Heck, I’m not a computer expert and I believe I could do better than this. The problems with the image to me indicate it is likely to be exactly what they say it is, a scanned image from a bound volume.
You couldn't get a passport with the digital image.
Even if he admitted on camera to the nation that he was born in Kenya, the media and sycophants on the left would back him and keep him in office.
I still confused. I’ve seen several youtubes where different people are playing with the layers.....are they all similar frauds that several people did with the colb, or did the document come from the whitehouse site while layered. and they all seem to show the scrubbed out areas that were originally green. is this a hoax that people have done after it was released, or did it come from the whitehouse that way?....and, it keeps getting reported to be a long form birth certificate, when it clearly says certificate of live birth right across the top.....wt*? it appears to me there is still lots of confusion, and I’m not sure where it starts, and where it ends. didn’t hannity and michelle makin identify the layered demonstrations as fake, and were they right? wt*?
i can’t open your link, could u check it out?
Karl Denninger, a guy who got rich running his own tech company, explained somewhere on his site why OCR does not explain the layering. I will look for a link.
It works for everybody else.
What is up with your join date? Today? Really?
Yeah, the layering ain’t where it’s at. Or the name of the hospital, or the out-of-sequence file number, or the race “African” or any number of other things.
The Denniger video, though, has convinced me it is a fake. I spent all day yesterday running down various challenges and was at that point convinced it was legit, I want it to be to put all this behind us, but the video from Denniger blew my mind. It is a computer generated document, not a scan or photocopy from HDoH. That is fakery.
You make a good point, and BTW I am not for Trump by any means.
The BC is a forgery. Some are explaining away the “layers” by saying they were caused by optical character recognition software. OCR might account for one extra layer, but it cannot account for the mismatch of the curve in the print and lines (which matches Nordyke perfectly) vs. the lack of curve in the security paper pattern.
Here is obama’s new b/c with the layers removed. You can see how the printed lines bend down to appear that the paper is bent down, but a careful examination of the security paper pattern shows that the security-paper line-pattern is STRAIGHT! That can only happen on a photo-shopped forgery! No copier or camera could do that. That ONE item proves it’s a forgery. They’re BUSTED!
http://freedomtorch.com/images/obama-birth-certificate-long-form.png
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
