Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump is mad as hell
You Tube ^ | Jan 30, 2011 | TheCrashdawg

Posted on 04/24/2011 4:05:29 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda

I hate to say it, but I get the same feeling from this guy that I got from Reagan 1979. I rememeber everyone cursing out Ronnie the same way "Oh he's B movie actor, he don't know what he is doing, he's a cheap talker, doing it for attention, dyes his hair, wears makeup, he's a fraud"...but me and my buddys we just *KNEW*...That's the feeling I'm getting from Trump. In 1979, we even made up "Reagan is God" bumper stickers just to piss off the liberals, completey over the top declerations, and I'm tempted to do the same with Trump.

Palin, Romney, I just don't feel it with those two. Yes we all have ideal candidates, but I just want someone guaranteed to to kick this Obamination out and I think this guy could do it and quite easily. We CANNOT risk this Obamination doing a 2nd term! NO NO NO! Can you imagine Trump debating Obamination? He would absolutely destroy him, no question.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2012; certifigate; elections; obama; oneborneveryminute; perot2point0; trump; trumpery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: murron

Reagan started as a Democrat. He had been the head of an influential Union. He routinely hobbnobbed with some of the most liberal left-wing people on the planet.

If he was alive now and running for office, there’d be a stampede of FReepers ready to burn him at the stake!


81 posted on 04/24/2011 7:43:53 PM PDT by djf (Dems and liberals: Let's redefine "marriage". We already redefined "natural born citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

That would be true if Obama debated, but he just drifts off into long diatribes and doesn’t respond. Unless there’s someone to make him respond, there’s no real debate.

It’s possible that Trump could make him mad enough to lose his cool and blurt out some truth, but I think he takes enough happy pills before situations like that to keep him cool.


82 posted on 04/24/2011 7:49:10 PM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: djf
Not really. In this case, don’t call Trump another Perot...

Trump reeks of Perot...down to the business 'know-how' and the bad hair.

83 posted on 04/24/2011 8:14:27 PM PDT by gogeo (Palin/Bachmann 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Barack Hussein Obama in 2008

Trump didn't either.

84 posted on 04/24/2011 8:40:54 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Wrong. We need someone who is conservative. If you buy his conversion why not buy Romney’s or McCains, or Huckster,Or Clinton, No He is no Reagan and never could be.


85 posted on 04/24/2011 8:43:09 PM PDT by carjic (Back at work after 2 years 2 months 1/4 pay 1099 income. And grateful...but not to "0".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cricket

Hence my suggestion of a Trump/West ticket. West could then come in in 2016 and run as an incumbent VP for the big prize.


86 posted on 04/24/2011 8:45:37 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth

I flip back and forth on Trump, at this stage, I’m watching and listening...but...here’s my thought:

On personality, even personal integrity, Trump, admittedly, isn’t fit to shine Reagan’s old shoes.

However, both men have a love for America, and a way to say it like it is and how it needs to be said.

Yes - he must be vetted, let me get that out there first.

However, maybe, just maybe, in today’s American Idol/Celebrity Apprentice/Dancing With The Stars/Reality TV world, Trump IS the Reagan of this generation.


87 posted on 04/24/2011 8:48:14 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

See tagline. It’s in jest, but, they ARE quite friendly to one another on TV. Palin has praised Trump and Trump has expressed admiration for Palin, while not quite being so nice to Romney.


88 posted on 04/24/2011 8:49:53 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Interesting theory.

However, it’s just possible that Trump has just enough influence that when he wants to be on, you let him on your show.

Oh and there’s this thing called RATINGS. People will tune in when you say “tonight Donald Trump will be on to discuss XXXXX” that might tune out if they say “tonight, Sarah Palin will be on to discuss XXXXX”.


89 posted on 04/24/2011 8:52:59 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

In this American Idol world, FAR different culturally from 1979/80 (regrettably, yes), Trump could be this generation’s Reagan.


90 posted on 04/24/2011 8:55:46 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: unkus

In Maryland that would be easy, since 1 out of 5 cars still has an Obama ‘08 sticker on it.


91 posted on 04/24/2011 8:57:22 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

Considering the hot women Trump has had, he might do OK with the ladies, too.

Although his billions probably didn’t hurt his success rate any.


92 posted on 04/24/2011 8:58:18 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Damn!


93 posted on 04/24/2011 9:00:49 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: djf

If you are right and the Republicans put forth a lukewarm candidate, then why should the independent Conservative need to back down?

I say the Republican Party should back down.

Why is it that Conservatives should always be the one to back down in a three way race “for the good of” the country, etc?

When will conservatives grab their balls and be able to run a three way race against a Republican party that time and time again has failed?

Should we do it now or wait four more years and try again then, and in the meantime accept a “the best we can do for now” candidate?

What the hell kind of manby-pamby approach is that?

And so what if Trump is newly converted?

Better newly converted and can win that never converted and can never win, which is what the Republican Party has shown us it is now and forever more will be.

Wake up people. Grab the brass ring here.


94 posted on 04/24/2011 9:01:27 PM PDT by NYCslicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYCslicker

What you said.


95 posted on 04/24/2011 9:02:41 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Birther on Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: NYCslicker

I never said an independent conservative would or should back down.

What I said was that in a 3-way between Zero, Trump as an Independent, and some Real-man Romney type pubbie BS, then Zero would win, Trump would easily come in second, and all the party-line pubbies would end up being the spoilers.


96 posted on 04/24/2011 9:11:39 PM PDT by djf (Dems and liberals: Let's redefine "marriage". We already redefined "natural born citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: djf

Why?


97 posted on 04/24/2011 9:21:19 PM PDT by NYCslicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: djf

If your answer is “because mainstream Republicans will never vote conservative”, then my question is:

Whose problem is that?


98 posted on 04/24/2011 9:23:16 PM PDT by NYCslicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: NYCslicker

Why what?

If you don’t see what I said, read the rest of my posts on the thread, including those that spoke about Reagan.


99 posted on 04/24/2011 9:26:36 PM PDT by djf (Dems and liberals: Let's redefine "marriage". We already redefined "natural born citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: tisket

Trump will be the “Perot for ‘12”, if Trump does decide to run as an Independent candidate for ‘12 POTUS, instead! If Trump really does care for the U.S., then why does he keep threatening to, possibly, run as an Independent candidate for ‘12 POTUS, and knowing that such a move would, probably, guarantee the re-election of Barack Obama for four additional years?


100 posted on 04/25/2011 12:58:12 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson