Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Repeal the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (says Mike Barkley, Congressional Candidate)
GroundReport.com ^ | April 17, 2011 | Mike Barkley

Posted on 04/18/2011 11:22:11 AM PDT by Immerito

Repeal the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

by Mjbarkl April 17, 2011

Over the months since the Tucson massacre, not much has happened in Washington to address the problem, which is Too many guns, Too easy access. Inaction is understandable. They're all afraid of the big bad NRA and the gun netherworld behind it. There is another reason: following Justice Scalia's Supreme Court opinion in the Heller case, extended to all other jurisdictions under the McDonald opinion, all gun control is now in doubt. There is only one way to solve this problem and that is to take it head on: Repeal the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. I propose Amendment Resolution and Legislation as follows:

Phase 1 - The Resolution, Format is from H.J.RES. 438, 102nd Congress::

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States repealing the right to keep and bear arms.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid for all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States at any time after the date of its submission for ratification: 'Article--

1. Any right to keep and bear arms, whether under the Second Amendment to this Constitution, or under some pre-existing doctrine of natural law or common law or otherwise, or under Constitution or laws of any State, is repealed.

2. The privilege to keep and bear arms throughout the United States shall be under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.'

Phase 2 - A Tax; Following adoption of the constitutional amendment, a bill to tax:

1. There is imposed an annual tax on each and every firearm in any household as follows: a. first firearm, $10 b. second firearm, $20 c. third firearm, $30 d. fourth through ninth firearms, $100 each e. firearms in excess of the ninth, $1,000 each. 2. This tax is assessed and payable on each April 15 for firearms held by a household at the end of the preceding year, to be paid with a schedule listing firearm type, manufacturer and serial number, the schedule submitted along with the tax return of such member of the household as the members of the household may choose, with other members attaching a copy of that schedule to their tax returns as well indicating by which member the tax will be paid. Where firearms are owned by a partnership, if there is only one general partner the arms shall be included with the schedule of that general partner; where there is more than one general partner, the partners shall choose which partner will report the firearms. Where firearms are owned by a corporation, the corporation shall report and pay tax as if it were a household. Where fiscal years do not coincide with calendar years, reporting shall be as of the end of the previous fiscal year. Where firearms are owned by a legitimate museum, the museum shall report the ownership annually as if it were a household, but shall be exempt from the tax except for the penalties in section 4 below. Sham transfers, that is, transfers to a legitimate museum or to an entity with a different fiscal year, and then back again, shall be reported and taxed as if there had been no transfer. Sham exports, that is, export followed by reimportation shall be reported by and taxed to the exporter as if there had been no export. If a firearm has no serial number, the owner shall apply to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for the assignment of one, and upon receipt of the assigned serial number shall indelibly engrave that number at a suitable location upon the firearm.

3. This tax may be avoided by selling the firearm to a licensed gun dealer or by turning the firearm over to an official firearm collection location or by export before December 31 of the prior year. Once a month such collection locations shall turn collected firearms over to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for destruction, except that the Bureau may withhold from destruction such firearms as are of historical interest for later donation to an appropriate museum.

4. Any firearm lost or stolen will incur a $1,000 penalty in the reporting year it was lost or stolen. For any such lost or stolen firearm that is subsequently recovered by the owner that $1,000 penalty shall be rescinded and refunded, except if the firearm has been used in the commission of a crime chargeable as a felony an additional $1,000 penalty will be imposed.

5. For each firearm sold by a licensed firearm dealer that is subsequently used in the commission of a crime chargeable as a felony a $1,000 penalty will be imposed against that dealer for each such year in which that firearm was used in such a crime.

6. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Internal Revenue Service shall jointly promulgate regulations for administering this Act.

Join me. Run for Congress. Fix this.

Best wishes,

--Mike Barkley, Candidate for Congress, http://www.mjbarkl.com/run.htm


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: banglist; california; cwii; freefirezone; missaaronzelman; rkba; theywantusdead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last
To: Immerito

False hope. A dork from Kenya got elected president in 2008.


21 posted on 04/18/2011 11:41:25 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.....Eagle Scout since Sep 9, 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Good luck with all of that as*hole.


22 posted on 04/18/2011 11:42:52 AM PDT by RC one (Donald Trump-I'm listening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

23 posted on 04/18/2011 11:46:40 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Never happen—changes to the Constitution are hard to get passed by the states.


24 posted on 04/18/2011 11:47:41 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Good for him!

He is at least proposing to follow the procedure outlined in the Constitution for changing it.

Proposing amendments is entirely constitutional. As is voting them down.


25 posted on 04/18/2011 11:49:24 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

This group of morons in office won’t let such puny things get in their way.


26 posted on 04/18/2011 11:50:38 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
1. Any right to keep and bear arms, whether under the Second Amendment to this Constitution, or under some pre-existing doctrine of natural law or common law or otherwise, or under Constitution or laws of any State, is repealed.

LOL! What a craven coward. Doesn't even have the b@lls to just say "The Second Amendment to the Constitution is hereby repealed."

Spineless libtard wuss. If you're going to "bring it", bring it, and let the chips fall where they may. (Right on your @ss.)

27 posted on 04/18/2011 11:52:22 AM PDT by LaybackLenny (Palin-Bachmann Overdrive 2012 - takin' care o' business!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

mjbarkl@inreach.com per his web page. remember, no foul language nor threats, as I suspect he is hoping for such letters to make a bigger name for himself.


28 posted on 04/18/2011 11:58:10 AM PDT by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Dumbass missed the word unalienable. His proposed bill is unconstitutional as it seeks to eliminate an unalienable right. A CA public school graduate.
29 posted on 04/18/2011 11:58:10 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

I think this guy needs to prepare for disappointment at the polls.


30 posted on 04/18/2011 12:00:10 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

You don’t repeal basic human rights. You violate them.


31 posted on 04/18/2011 12:05:45 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
This tax may be avoided by selling the firearm to a licensed gun dealer or by turning the firearm over to an official firearm collection location or by export before December 31 of the prior year

I opt for none of the above mr. statist.
32 posted on 04/18/2011 12:06:38 PM PDT by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Not sure why you all are getting so testy. This sort of Stupid is stock and trade for the delusional state of KA. Its the home of self worshipping, morally superior, self righteous, know it alls dabbling in pseudo-science with great weather too! Who would have guessed then its spawn would be a Mike Barkley.


33 posted on 04/18/2011 12:07:58 PM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Against all of us and God himself....

The Inalienable aspect of enumerated (as in simply named by the US const. )natural rights is that they emanate not from governnent (no rights do...) but rather from nature (God).

No God-given Rights of man can be “repealed” by a mere govrnemnt; rather they would have to be illegally abridged.

What a moron.


34 posted on 04/18/2011 12:10:43 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" (my spelling is generally korrect!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

I don’t know if “never” is appropriate. This sis something that if it’s proposed, must be fought tooth and nail.

Not sure about how true it is, but W Bush theoretically signed the Campaign Finance bill thinking that the Supremes would knock it down, so he’d get credit for signing it without it coming to fruition. As we know he was wrong, the Supremes let most of it pass.


35 posted on 04/18/2011 12:11:06 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
According to the link you provide, he proposes:

Provide that union certification votes shall succeed by a majority of those workers voting, not by a majority of workers eligible to vote

He obviously does not know that that is precisely the current law with the NLRB. I found out while researching a union organizing campaign against my wife's employer. (Union lost with less than 25% of the vote.) And he's against the right to work!

36 posted on 04/18/2011 12:11:48 PM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

You cannot repeal a right, you can only give the government permission to trample it.


37 posted on 04/18/2011 12:12:40 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

MR. Mikey may wish to become familiar with:

www.monster.com


38 posted on 04/18/2011 12:21:28 PM PDT by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Suppose such excreta actually became law of the land. Who, other than lieberals, would obey it?


39 posted on 04/18/2011 12:26:19 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Sounds like a communist and looks like a fruitcake.


40 posted on 04/18/2011 12:44:30 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin. He purged his whole Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson